We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Singular is our best overall pick: it combines mobile and omnichannel measurement with a free plan, though Growth costs scale with conversions. Adjust and AppsFlyer also suit attribution teams, but their pricing is hard to compare. AppTweak stands out for ASO at a published $79 starting price, while AdMob is free for app monetization. The rest serve narrower needs, from market intelligence to rewarded offers. Treat opaque pricing and estimates cautiously, and match each tool to the job you actually need done before switching.
Quick picksThe shortlist
SingularSingularBest overall · $0.05/mo
AdjustAdjustBest for attribution · Free
AppsFlyerAppsFlyerBest for cross-channel measurement · Free
AppTweakAppTweakBest for ASO · $79/mo
Google AdMobGoogle AdMobBest for free monetization · Free
KochavaKochavaBest for broad measurement · $500/mo
AppMagicAppMagicBest for app research · Custom
Sensor TowerSensor TowerBest for market intelligence · Custom
BranchBranchBest for deep links · Custom
LiftoffLiftoffBest for app growth · Custom
InMobiInMobiBest for mediation options · $20/mo
Digital TurbineDigital TurbineBest for app distribution · Custom
Unity AdsUnity AdsBest for Unity developers · $192.50/mo
TapjoyTapjoyBest for rewarded offers · Custom
01Compared at a glance
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.5 | $0.05/mo | Yes | — | |
| 6.8 | Free | Yes | — | |
| 6.2 | Free | Yes | 30 days | |
| 6.7 | $79/mo | No | — | |
| 6.8 | Free | Yes | — | |
| 7.0 | $500/mo | Yes | — | |
| 6.3 | Custom | No | — | |
| 6.2 | Custom | No | — | |
| 5.9 | Custom | No | — | |
| 5.8 | Custom | No | — | |
| 5.5 | $20/mo | Yes | — | |
| 5.5 | Custom | No | — | |
| 5.3 | $192.50/mo | Yes | 14 days | |
| 4.8 | Custom | No | — |
02The picks, in detail
- Best overall
SingularSingularSingular ranks first for its combination of marketing data consolidation, mobile and omnichannel measurement, and a free plan. The listed starting price is $0.05, but Growth costs scale with conversions and Enterprise pricing is custom. That makes the free tier a useful starting point, not a reliable estimate of what a larger team will pay.
What works
- Free plan includes 15,000 paid conversions
- Cost aggregation covers 1,200+ sources
- Measures mobile, web, CTV, PC and console
What doesn't
- Growth is priced per conversion
- Enterprise pricing is custom
- Several capabilities are listed as add-ons

- Best for attribution
AdjustAdjustAdjust is a strong fit for teams measuring campaign attribution that also need deep links, fraud controls, or incrementality measurement. A free plan is listed, but paid pricing and plan limits are not published on the vendor's site. We rank it below Singular because that opacity makes it harder to judge the cost of expanding usage.
What works
- Combines attribution and campaign optimization features
- TrueLink supports branded links across apps and web
- Includes fraud prevention for invalid activity
What doesn't
- Monthly and annual prices are not published
- Core and Enterprise require contacting Adjust
- Overage costs are not published

- Best for cross-channel measurement
AppsFlyerAppsFlyerAppsFlyer suits teams measuring campaigns across channels that need attribution and deep links. A free plan is listed, with a conversion allowance for brands that can stay within it. Before switching, check conversion costs, add-on pricing, and security concerns; the published information does not give paid prices or enough detail to estimate a full rollout.
What works
- Measures across mobile, web, CTV, PC and console
- Combines attribution, deep linking and fraud protection
- Supports optimization postbacks to major networks
What doesn't
- Monthly and annual plan rates are not published
- Growth charges $0.07 per conversion after its allowance
- Select premium add-on prices are not published

- Best for ASO
AppTweakAppTweakAppTweak brings ASO and Apple Ads into one workflow, with AI app recommendation tracking also listed among its strengths. Its starting price is $79, giving buyers a clearer point of comparison than tools with unpublished pricing. The main caveat is fit: the published information warns that paying for five apps can be hard to justify if you only need one.
What works
- ASO intelligence covers more than 100 countries
- Tracks keyword opportunities, competitors and rankings
- Combines ASO and Apple Ads data
What doesn't
- Essential starts with five apps, even if you need fewer
- Monthly billing is $99 for the base plan
- The base plan lists one seat

- Best for free monetization
Google AdMobGoogle AdMobAdMob is a practical pick for developers starting app monetization: it offers several ad formats and mediation for free, and it fits publishers using Firebase Analytics. Its limitation is not a listed subscription cost but uncertainty around earnings and account support. Choose it for monetization needs, not as a substitute for an attribution or ASO platform.
What works
- Free to use, with no subscription tiers
- Supports six in-app ad formats
- Mediation combines bidding and waterfall setups
What doesn't
- Revenue-share rate is not published
- Seat and usage limits are not published
- Free access does not ensure meaningful earnings
- Best for broad measurement
KochavaKochavaKochava covers mobile attribution, web and CTV measurement, and marketing mix modeling. A free plan is listed, but paid plans start at $500 per month, while prices for many add-ons are unpublished. That makes it a candidate for teams with broad measurement needs and budget, rather than buyers looking for a low-cost, easy-to-price switch.
What works
- Free App Analytics includes 10K conversions per month
- Free plan includes mobile and CTV measurement
- Foundation adds web measurement and 180-day retention
What doesn't
- Foundation starts at $500 per month
- Enterprise starts at $2,000 per month
- Annual prices are not published

- Best for app research
AppMagicAppMagicAppMagic is aimed at teams benchmarking mobile app niches, comparing ad creatives, or tracking Steam games. Its breadth may suit researchers who need those views together, but pricing is not published. The published information also flags mixed feedback on its estimates, so treat market figures cautiously and compare them with other evidence before making decisions.
What works
- Estimates revenue, downloads and revenue per download
- Classifies over 380,000 apps with 500-plus tags
- Indexes over 230 million ad creatives
What doesn't
- Starting price is not published
- Seat and usage limits are not published
- Pricing requires a custom sales quote

- Best for market intelligence
Sensor TowerSensor TowerSensor Tower is a fit for teams tracking app competitors, digital share of voice, or retail and gaming markets. Its stated strength is wide market-intelligence coverage, but pricing is unclear and estimates call for caution. We rank it for research-focused buyers, not teams shopping for campaign attribution or monetization software.
What works
- Tracks downloads, revenue and app engagement
- Reports keyword rankings, ratings and reviews
- Shows ad networks, advertisers and creatives
What doesn't
- Customized plan pricing is not published
- Monthly and annual billing details are not published
- Free trial terms are not published

- Best for deep links
BranchBranchBranch suits teams managing app customer journeys, needing deep links and attribution, or working with many partner integrations. The published information describes a broad app-marketing toolkit with useful integration tiers, but lists no published price. Buyers should confirm which tier includes the integrations they need and request pricing before comparing it with alternatives.
What works
- Connects journeys across ads, email, SMS, social, web, apps and chat
- Includes deep linking into relevant in-app experiences
- Attribution includes post-install events
What doesn't
- Monthly and annual prices are not published
- No free plan is listed
- Basics limits ad partners, webhooks and postbacks to 3 each

- Best for app growth
LiftoffLiftoffLiftoff is worth evaluating if the brief spans user acquisition and monetization, in-app ad yield options, or programmatic growth and reporting APIs. The published information does not list pricing, making the cost of a switch difficult to assess. Its broad scope is a reason to shortlist it, not proof that every team needs the full offering.
What works
- Covers acquisition, re-engagement, and publisher monetization
- Supports CPI, CPA, ROAS, and predicted lifetime-value optimization
- Monetize includes in-app bidding and waterfall mediation
What doesn't
- Starting price is not published
- Monthly and annual prices are not published
- Pricing is custom or performance-based

- Best for mediation options
InMobiInMobiInMobi may suit publishers exploring another mediation demand source, sites needing a free CMP tier, or teams already using an SSP integration. The listed starting price is $20, alongside a free plan, but pricing clarity and support reports give buyers reason to pause. Confirm the relevant plan and support terms before committing.
What works
- Essentials CMP plan is listed as free for apps and sites
- Premium CMP is listed at $20 per domain monthly
- Premium is free via SSP integration
What doesn't
- Ad-platform pricing is not published on the vendor's site
- Annual billing prices are not published
- Seat and usage limits are not published

- Best for app distribution
Digital TurbineDigital TurbineDigital Turbine is aimed at advertisers seeking device-level app discovery, developers pursuing broader distribution, and publishers monetizing mobile inventory. The published information lists no price, and flags user-trust concerns as a consideration. It belongs on a shortlist when distribution or monetization is the need, with risk tolerance and commercial terms checked first.
What works
- Supports app distribution through stores, alternative paths and direct channels
- SingleTap enables installs that bypass app stores
- Full-funnel mobile ad experiences for advertisers
What doesn't
- Starting price and billing cadence are not published
- Custom enterprise terms make value comparisons difficult
- No free plan is listed

- Best for Unity developers
Unity AdsUnity AdsUnity Ads is most relevant to game developers already using Unity tools and seeking player growth. A free plan is listed, with a starting price of $192.50; teams should compare it with other mobile ad networks before committing. Its fit is narrower than a measurement platform, so it is less compelling when the need is attribution or ASO.
What works
- Player growth is part of Unity's broader game platform
- Unity describes tools for identifying likely players
- Built-in player insights are listed
What doesn't
- Unity Ads-specific pricing is not published
- The homepage does not explain ad formats
- Unity plan prices are not Ads rates

- Best for rewarded offers
TapjoyTapjoyTapjoy is designed for apps monetizing through rewarded offers, advertisers needing app-level bid controls, and teams testing multi-action offer campaigns. Pricing is not published, and reported reward issues temper the case. We would keep it on a focused shortlist for offerwall needs, while checking user feedback and commercial terms before choosing it.
What works
- App-level bidding can use ROAS data or offerwall position ranking.
- Self-serve dashboard supports campaign setup and optimization.
- Multi-Reward CPE offers can include multiple actions or events.
What doesn't
- Starting price, plans and billing terms are not published.
- Pricing information is marked low confidence.
- Reddit users report completed offers failing to credit.

03How we chose
We weigh published pricing, stated plan limits, product documentation, and Reddit sentiment when it is available. Our comparison separates attribution, user acquisition, app store optimization, and broader growth needs rather than treating every platform as interchangeable. We give more weight to details a buyer can verify, such as documented caps and pricing terms, than to broad marketing claims. If a price or limit is not published, we mark it as not published instead of estimating it. Reddit comments provide context, not proof of performance.
04Choose for the job you need done
Start with the main gap in your app marketing stack: attribution, user acquisition, app store optimization, or a wider growth workflow. Those jobs can overlap, but a platform name alone does not tell you which capabilities are included or what they cost. Shortlist tools only after checking their product documentation against your requirements.
Write down the integrations, reporting, channels, and team workflows you need before comparing vendors. Then confirm each item in the docs or with the vendor; do not treat a feature label as proof that it covers your use case. If you need multiple functions, compare the cost and operational burden of one broader platform with a focused tool plus your existing stack. The right choice depends on fit, not the longest feature list.
05Compare total cost and switching risk
Do not compare vendors on a headline price alone. Check whether pricing is published, which plan or usage limits apply, and what the vendor says about billing as your app activity grows. If pricing or a cap is not published, treat it as an open question and request the terms in writing before you budget. Include any tools you would keep, replace, or add alongside the platform.
Before switching, list the data, integrations, reports, and team processes that must carry over. Use product documentation to confirm what can be migrated and where you may need a new workflow. Ask vendors about contract terms and transition requirements rather than assuming the change is simple. A lower starting price may not be the lower-cost option if it leaves required capabilities or reporting uncovered.
Questions people ask
What does mobile app marketing software do?
It can support app attribution, user acquisition, app store optimization, and growth work. The exact mix depends on the product, so check its documentation for the specific functions, integrations, and reporting you need. A category label is not a guarantee that every platform covers all four areas.
How should I choose a mobile app marketing platform?
Start with your primary need, then compare documented capabilities, integrations, published prices, and stated limits. Check how the tool fits your current stack and what a switch would require. If a key price or limit is not published, ask the vendor for the terms before making a decision.
How much does mobile app marketing software cost?
There is no single category price to rely on. Compare each vendor’s published pricing and plan limits; when a price or cap is not published, treat it as unknown and request a quote. Confirm what the quoted amount covers and whether usage or contract terms affect your budget.
Can one platform replace my whole app marketing stack?
Possibly, but do not assume that a platform covers every workflow you use today. Map your current tools, integrations, data, and reporting needs, then verify each requirement in the vendor’s documentation. Compare the cost and operational impact of replacing tools with the cost of keeping parts of your stack.