We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Teamup is built for shared schedules, granular calendar permissions, and sharing events with collaborators. Its free plan is tight, and the listing starts at $12, with larger teams paying more for capacity. The alternatives below range from shared-calendar tools to scheduling and planning apps; they are not all direct replacements for Teamup’s permissions. The published Reddit material does not discuss the Teamup calendar product, so we can’t use it as evidence for why customers leave.
01Why people leave Teamup
The free plan feels tight
The listing calls Teamup’s free plan tight, but doesn’t publish exact caps here. Check whether your current usage fits before moving.
More capacity costs more
Teamup starts at $12, and larger teams pay more for capacity. Higher-tier prices aren’t published in the published details.
You need a different workflow
If you need time-zone comparisons, booking links, or automated planning, these alternatives cover different workflows than shared schedules alone.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Shared schedules and bookings
CalendarWizCalendarWiz
CalendarWiz is the closest listed fit if your Teamup use centers on shared schedules plus rooms, equipment, or a public website calendar. Its listing starts at $12 and names those use cases. The catch: plan-by-plan differences aren’t clear in the published details, so confirm its permissions and booking limits match your setup.
Trade-off: Tier differences are unclear, making the price harder to judge.
6.0/10from
$12/mo - Availability and booking
CalendarCalendarCalendar is worth comparing if your team needs shared availability, time-zone scheduling, and booking automation. Those are the use cases in its listing, and it starts at $16. That makes it a more focused option for scheduling workflows, but the published details don’t establish that it matches Teamup’s granular calendar permissions.
Trade-off: Paid entry starts at $16; permission details aren’t provided.
7.1/10from
$16/mo - Simple shared calendars
Keep&ShareKeep&ShareKeep&Share suits light calendar needs, small teams sharing schedules, and businesses offering appointment booking. Its listing includes a free plan, which may appeal if Teamup’s cost is the reason you’re leaving. The free tier has firm limits, though, and paid-plan pricing isn’t clearly published, so check the caps before moving a team.
Trade-off: Free-plan limits are firm, and paid pricing is unclear.
6.2/10from
Freefree plan - Multiple work calendars
CalendarBridgeCalendarBridgeCalendarBridge is a better fit when the problem is managing several calendars rather than replacing every Teamup workflow. Its listing covers Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace teams, plus booking links, with pricing from $4. Compare its plan limits against the calendars and booking links your team needs before switching.
Trade-off: It focuses on calendar syncing, not shared schedule management.
6.8/10from
$4/mo - Automated calendar planning
Reclaim AIReclaim AIReclaim AI is listed for automated calendar planning, schedule coordination, and focus time, with a free plan and paid pricing from $10. Consider it if you want planning automation rather than only a shared calendar. The listing flags plan limits and recurring Todoist sync as details to check before migrating.
Trade-off: Plan limits and recurring Todoist sync need checking.
7.0/10from
$10/mofree plan - Calendars and tasks
MorgenMorgenMorgen brings calendars and tasks together and is listed for AI time blocking and coordinating availability and meetings. Pricing starts at $15; the published summary says to budget for an annual plan or $30 monthly. It may suit teams consolidating tools, but it is a planner, not a confirmed match for Teamup permissions.
Trade-off: Budget for an annual plan or $30 monthly.
7.8/10from
$15/mo - Time-zone comparisons
World Time BuddyWorld Time BuddyWorld Time Buddy is a simple option if your main Teamup job is comparing time zones and proposing meeting slots. Its listing includes a free plan and sharing a proposed time. It is less compelling if you rely on calendar workflows, so treat it as a narrow substitute rather than a full Teamup replacement.
Trade-off: Less useful for calendar workflows.
7.3/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Teamup Teamup (current) | 7.4 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams sharing schedules and resources |
| CalendarWiz CalendarWiz | 6.0 | $12/mo | No | Teams sharing schedules |
| Calendar Calendar | 7.1 | $16/mo | No | Teams sharing calendar availability |
| Keep&Share Keep&Share | 6.2 | Free | Yes | Individuals with light calendar needs |
| CalendarBridge CalendarBridge | 6.8 | $4/mo | No | People managing several work calendars |
| Reclaim AI Reclaim AI | 7.0 | $10/mo | Yes | People who want automated calendar planning |
| Morgen Morgen | 7.8 | $15/mo | No | People consolidating calendars and tasks |
| World Time Buddy World Time Buddy | 7.3 | Free | Yes | Comparing several time zones |
Questions people ask
How much does Teamup cost?
The pricing page gives Teamup a free plan and a starting price of $12. It describes the free plan as tight and says larger teams pay more for capacity. Exact free-plan limits and higher-tier prices aren’t included here, so check Teamup’s current pricing page before comparing total costs.
Which Teamup alternative is best for room or equipment bookings?
CalendarWiz is the clearest fit in this list: its stated use cases include shared schedules, booking rooms or equipment, and publishing website calendars. Its listing starts at $12, but tier differences are unclear. Confirm that the plan you’re considering includes the bookings and permissions your organization needs.
Do Reddit users explain why people leave Teamup?
Not in the published Reddit material. The Reddit threads we read discuss a game, hiring, and offshore staffing—not the Teamup calendar product. We can’t use them to support claims about customer complaints or switching reasons. The reasons on this page come from the published product summary, not those threads.