We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
OpenProject is a capable hub for complex schedules and hybrid project work, with a free self-hosted option. But one Reddit poster says useful Community Edition features are locked behind Enterprise, while another found the software too complex for a narrow scheduling need. There is also a pricing constraint: the listing says paid plans start at 25 users. We’ve picked alternatives for teams that want a simpler task flow, broader coordination or portfolio planning, with listed starting prices where available.
01Why people leave OpenProject
Community edition misses features
One Reddit poster says advanced boards, collaboration tools and some reporting options are locked behind Enterprise.
Too much for simple scheduling
A self-hosting user wanted deadline and staffing calculations, but said OpenProject felt too complex for that limited job.
Paid plans start at 25 users
The listing says OpenProject paid plans start at 25 users, which may not suit smaller teams evaluating a paid upgrade.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Visual task boards
TrelloTrelloTrello is the clearest fit if the part you want to keep is visual task flow, not OpenProject’s wider project structure. Its listing highlights boards, automation and integrations, with a free plan and a $5 starting price. That points small teams toward a more board-centered setup, rather than a project hub built for complex schedules.
Trade-off: Less suited to teams that need portfolio planning or complex schedules.
7.3/10from
$5/mofree plan - Personal task management
TodoistTodoistIf OpenProject is more machinery than your work needs, Todoist takes a task-manager approach. The listing highlights recurring tasks, shared team workspaces and natural-language capture. It has a free plan and starts at $5, making it worth comparing for people who mainly need to organize and share tasks, not coordinate complex projects.
Trade-off: A task manager, not a broad project-and-workflow hub.
7.0/10from
$5/mofree plan - Cross-project coordination
AsanaAsanaAsana is a better match when the reason for leaving is coordination across projects rather than a need for a simpler board. Its listing calls out shared workflows, goals and dependencies. It has a free plan and starts at $10.99, but its higher tiers and custom enterprise pricing deserve scrutiny before you move a larger team.
Trade-off: Higher tiers and enterprise pricing need scrutiny.
7.0/10from
$10.99/mofree plan - Visual shared workflows
monday.commonday.commonday.com suits teams that want to build shared workflows and track them with visual dashboards. That makes it a candidate if OpenProject’s structure feels like too much, but you still need a configurable team system. The listing includes a free plan and an $8 starting price; check seat prices and plan limits before moving.
Trade-off: Check seat pricing and plan limits before switching.
6.5/10from
£8/mofree plan - Portfolio planning
SmartsheetSmartsheetSmartsheet is the more relevant option if you are leaving OpenProject for stronger portfolio-level coordination, not a lightweight task app. Its listing targets PMOs, portfolio dashboards and resource planning across teams. It starts at $9, with no free plan listed. That makes it a less obvious fit for simple, low-cost project tracking.
Trade-off: Less compelling for simple, low-cost project tracking.
6.7/10from
$9/mo - Consolidated work tools
ClickUpClickUpClickUp may suit teams trying to bring projects, docs, chat and time tracking together instead of maintaining a project hub plus separate tools. Its listing includes a free plan and a $9 starting price. That breadth is a reason to compare it, but users report complexity and reliability concerns, so don’t assume it will feel simpler.
Trade-off: Users report complexity and reliability concerns.
6.7/10from
$9/mofree plan - Product issue tracking
LinearLinearLinear is a focused alternative for product teams that mainly use OpenProject to track issues and plan work from idea to launch. Its listing describes it as a Jira-switcher option prioritizing simplicity. It has a free plan and starts at $10. Before switching, check whether its reporting meets your needs and review annual pricing.
Trade-off: Check reporting needs and annual pricing.
7.7/10from
$10/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 OpenProject OpenProject (current) | 6.8 | €5.95/mo | Yes | Teams managing complex project schedules |
| Trello Trello | 7.3 | $5/mo | Yes | Individuals and small teams |
| Todoist Todoist | 7.0 | $5/mo | Yes | Individuals organizing recurring tasks |
| Asana Asana | 7.0 | $10.99/mo | Yes | Teams coordinating cross-project work |
| monday.com monday.com | 6.5 | £8/mo | Yes | Teams building shared workflows |
| Smartsheet Smartsheet | 6.7 | $9/mo | No | PMOs coordinating multiple projects |
| ClickUp ClickUp | 6.7 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating work tools |
| Linear Linear | 7.7 | $10/mo | Yes | Product teams wanting focused issue tracking |
Questions people ask
Which OpenProject alternative is simplest for task boards?
Trello is the clearest board-first choice in this shortlist: its listing highlights visual boards, automation and integrations. Todoist is another option if you mainly need recurring tasks, shared task workspaces and natural-language capture. Neither is presented here as a replacement for complex project scheduling.
How much do OpenProject alternatives cost?
The listed starting prices are $5 for Trello and Todoist, $8 for monday.com, $9 for ClickUp and Smartsheet, $10 for Linear, and $10.99 for Asana. The listings note free plans for all except Smartsheet. They do not specify billing periods here, so check each pricing page before comparing totals.
Can I switch from OpenProject and keep self-hosting?
OpenProject’s listing includes a free self-hosted option. The alternative listings here do not establish whether those products offer self-hosting, so we would not assume they do. If hosting control is a requirement, verify deployment options directly before choosing a replacement; a simpler interface may not preserve your hosting setup.