We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
For most teams, start with the assistant that fits software and workflows you already use. Zoom AI Companion is a practical meeting pick from $8.33/month, while Rovo makes more sense for Atlassian users and Dust for teams building shared agents. Specialist tools may be a better fit for clinics, finance, legal work or sales, but several publish no starting price. We rank 28 options by overall fit, pricing clarity and the caveats in the published buying information. Treat starting prices as a first check, not a full quote; confirm usage caps and billing terms before switching.
Quick picksThe shortlist
Zoom AI CompanionZoom AI CompanionBest overall · $8.33/mo
RovoRovoBest for Atlassian · $5/mo
DustDustBest for shared agents · €24/mo
BastionGPTBastionGPTBest for clinical notes · $20/mo
Fyxer AIFyxer AIBest for email workflows · $37/mo
JaceJaceBest for inbox automation · $20/mo
Sintra AISintra AIBest for small teams · $15.60/mo
Amazon Q BusinessAmazon Q BusinessBest for AWS teams · $3/mo
ChatPRDChatPRDBest for PRD drafting · $14.92/mo- HapaxHapaxBest for governed workflows · $150/mo
NablaNablaBest for EHR notes · $119/mo
AskElephantAskElephantBest for CRM teams · $99/mo
AveriAveriBest for startup marketing · $99/mo
PolyAIPolyAIBest for voice agents · Custom
Kore.aiKore.aiBest for enterprise support · Custom
EliseAIEliseAIBest for housing operations · Custom
HyroHyroBest for patient requests · Custom
Leena AILeena AIBest for HR and IT · Custom- ElionElionBest for appointment calls · Custom
LomanLomanBest for restaurant calls · Custom
AmeliaAmeliaBest for voice programs · Custom
Bond AIBond AIBest for credit unions · $99/mo
RogoRogoBest for finance analysis · Custom
TaxGPTTaxGPTBest for tax research · Custom
Paxton AIPaxton AIBest for litigation teams · $249.92/mo
Cognigy.AICognigy.AIBest for contact centers · $3,590/mo
DelphiDelphiBest for creator expertise · $416.67/mo- QuinQuinBest for live personalization · Custom
01Compared at a glance
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom AI CompanionZoom AI Companion | 7.0 | $8.33/mo | Yes | — |
| RovoRovo | 6.5 | $5/mo | Yes | 30 days |
| DustDust | 6.5 | €24/mo | Yes | — |
| BastionGPTBastionGPT | 7.2 | $20/mo | No | 7 days |
| Fyxer AIFyxer AI | 6.5 | $37/mo | Yes | 14 days |
| JaceJace | 6.8 | $20/mo | No | 7 days |
| Sintra AISintra AI | 6.4 | $15.60/mo | No | — |
| Amazon Q BusinessAmazon Q Business | 5.5 | $3/mo | No | 60 days |
| ChatPRDChatPRD | 5.7 | $14.92/mo | Yes | 14 days |
| HapaxHapax | 6.8 | $150/mo | Yes | — |
| NablaNabla | 7.0 | $119/mo | No | 30 days |
| AskElephantAskElephant | 7.0 | $99/mo | No | — |
| AveriAveri | 6.5 | $99/mo | No | 14 days |
| PolyAIPolyAI | 7.0 | Custom | No | — |
| Kore.aiKore.ai | 6.5 | Custom | No | 90 days |
| EliseAIEliseAI | 6.3 | Custom | No | — |
| HyroHyro | 6.0 | Custom | No | — |
| Leena AILeena AI | 6.2 | Custom | No | — |
| ElionElion | 6.2 | Custom | No | 30 days |
| LomanLoman | 6.2 | Custom | No | — |
| AmeliaAmelia | 5.8 | Custom | No | — |
| Bond AIBond AI | 6.0 | $99/mo | No | — |
| RogoRogo | 6.2 | Custom | No | — |
| TaxGPTTaxGPT | 5.2 | Custom | No | — |
| Paxton AIPaxton AI | 6.3 | $249.92/mo | No | 7 days |
| Cognigy.AICognigy.AI | 6.2 | $3,590/mo | No | — |
| DelphiDelphi | 5.2 | $416.67/mo | Yes | — |
| QuinQuin | 5.5 | Custom | No | — |
02The picks, in detail
- Best overallZoom AI CompanionZoom AI Companion
Zoom AI Companion is the broadest low-friction pick here for teams that already use Zoom and mainly need meeting summaries, follow-up notes or multi-platform note-taking. The listed starting price is $8.33/month, with a free plan. It is less convincing if you need uncapped AI or strong assurances about sensitive data.
What works
- Free Basic plan includes three meeting summaries monthly
- Pro includes unlimited meeting summaries and AI note-taking
- Standalone plan supports Zoom, Google Meet and Teams
What doesn't
- Basic caps AI queries at 20 monthly
- Basic limits workflow runs to 10 monthly
- Business requires a 10-user minimum
- Best for AtlassianRovoRovo
Rovo is a sensible choice when Jira and Confluence already hold your team's work and knowledge. It can search internal Atlassian knowledge and support knowledge-based automations, with a listed starting price of $5 and a free plan. Its pricing clarity is a caveat, so confirm the plan details before a rollout.
What works
- Uses team knowledge to inform AI apps
- Shared context for teams and AI agents
- Knowledge connectors help centralize sources
What doesn't
- Standalone usage limits are not published
- Standalone price is $0 only during beta
- Extra bundled usage costs $0.01 per credit
- Best for shared agentsDustDust
Dust suits teams that want shared AI-agent workflows and a choice of models, with Enterprise controls available. Its listed starting price is $24, and a free plan is offered. Before putting a team on it, check credit consumption and connector limits; those details can change the value of the starting price.
What works
- More than 20 frontier and open-source models
- Free plan includes 500 lifetime credits
- Pro and Max save 20% with annual billing
What doesn't
- Pro and Max list only three data connectors
- Paid plans charge per seat
- Prices exclude VAT
- Best for clinical notesBastionGPTBastionGPT
BastionGPT is aimed at clinicians drafting and formatting notes, reviewing long documents and using a healthcare-focused AI workspace. The listed starting price is $20, which makes it easier to compare than several specialist options here. Its key buying question is usage: check the limits before switching a practice workflow.
What works
- Professional starts at $20 per user monthly
- Every plan lists a signed BAA
- AI scribe supports live sessions and audio uploads
What doesn't
- Annual billing prices are not published
- Message limits are unclear on the pricing details
- A Reddit commenter reports a 20-message, three-hour cap
- Best for email workflowsFyxer AIFyxer AI
Fyxer AI covers email and meeting workflows, including priority briefings and recurring agenda automation. A free plan is listed, but inbox features start at $37 per person/month when billed annually. That is a meaningful per-seat cost for a team, so compare the specific inbox features you need against existing tools.
What works
- Combines priority briefings, agendas, team updates and recurring workflows.
- A customer quote says drafts reflect the user's writing style.
- Connects with email, calendars, chat, video and CRM services.
What doesn't
- Free plan excludes inbox triage and automated draft replies.
- Free plan has three personal Spaces and no shared Spaces.
- Pro starts at $37 per person/month billed annually.
- Best for inbox automationJaceJace
Jace combines a busy-inbox assistant with email-triggered business tasks and AI email drafts. Its listed starting price is $20. That makes it worth comparing with narrower email tools, but do not treat the entry price as the whole cost: check credit caps and which workflows consume them before rolling it out.
What works
- Drafts replies using email and connected-tool context
- Rules can apply templates and trigger actions
- Labels emails by type and priority
What doesn't
- No free plan is listed
- Plus is capped at 10,000 monthly credits
- Plus supports up to two inboxes
- Best for small teamsSintra AISintra AI
Sintra AI offers role-based AI help for small teams, but buyers need to build business context and accept annual billing. Its listed starting price is $15.60, and the 250-credit cap is a notable constraint. The annual deal may suit a light workflow; uneven automation makes it harder to recommend broadly.
What works
- All 12 role-based helpers are included on every listed term
- Business context can include brand details, workflows, documents, and goals
- 15+ integrations are listed across the plans
What doesn't
- Every plan is capped at 250 monthly credits
- No free plan is listed, and trial details aren’t published
- The $48.50 monthly term is costly beside the annual rate
- Best for AWS teamsAmazon Q BusinessAmazon Q Business
Amazon Q Business is worth considering if your organization already uses AWS and wants to connect internal knowledge sources. The listed starting price is $3, but index fees add a budgeting question. Check those fees and connector reliability before comparing it with tools whose prices bundle more of the service.
What works
- Lite starts at $3 per user monthly
- Pro includes built-in and custom plugins
- Pro lists Slack and Microsoft Teams integrations
What doesn't
- Indexing is billed separately by the hour
- Lite includes no built-in or custom plugins
- Annual-billing prices are not published
- Best for PRD draftingChatPRDChatPRD
ChatPRD is focused on product requirements documents, shared product docs and enterprise search. A free plan is listed, with a $14.92 starting price; the Pro plan is described as $15. That price deserves comparison with a DIY alternative, especially if your team only needs occasional drafting.
What works
- Free plan includes document generation and basic templates
- Pro includes unlimited chats and documents
- Teams adds real-time document collaboration
What doesn't
- Free plan limits users to three chats
- Pro annual billing requires $179 upfront
- Teams annual billing requires $349 per seat upfront
- Best for governed workflows
HapaxHapax
Hapax is aimed at recurring business workflows, with agent approvals and audit trails for organizations that need oversight. Its listed starting price is $0, but that does not settle the cost of usage. Ask for clear limits and pricing before committing; the free entry point alone is not enough to compare value.
What works
- Pay As You Go has no monthly fee
- Pro includes 85 monthly credits
- Additional credits cost $2.50 each
What doesn't
- Pay As You Go still costs $2.50 per credit
- Pro credits are capped at 85 monthly
- Enterprise pricing is not published
- Best for EHR notesNablaNabla
Nabla targets clinicians documenting visits in EHRs, including Epic users seeking ambient notes and teams that want coding suggestions. The listed starting price is $119/month, providing a clearer entry point than many healthcare alternatives. Organization pricing is not clear, so practices should request a complete quote before deciding.
What works
- Generates structured notes from patient-clinician conversations
- Clinical dictation integrates with Epic and major EHRs
- Suggests E/M and ICD-10 codes
What doesn't
- Individual subscription costs $119 per month
- Annual billing price is not published
- Group and enterprise pricing is not published
- Best for CRM teamsAskElephantAskElephant
AskElephant is built for HubSpot or Salesforce revenue teams automating CRM updates and standardizing sales coaching. Its listed starting price is $99 with annual billing, a real hurdle for smaller teams. For organizations with those CRM workflows, it may warrant a closer look; confirm the billing commitment and fit first.
What works
- Automatically updates unlimited CRM fields on Core
- Captures conversations across web, desktop, mobile and dialers
- Extracts commitments, objections and deal risks
What doesn't
- Core starts at $99 per user/month, billed annually
- Monthly prices are not published
- White-Glove costs $119 per user/month annually
- Best for startup marketingAveriAveri
Averi connects content planning and drafting for startup marketers, solo founders and small teams publishing through a CMS. Its listed starting price is $99/month. That is a substantial commitment for a content workflow whose value is hard to verify from the published information, so compare it with your current planning and publishing setup.
What works
- Research, strategy, drafting, and publishing in one workflow
- Brand voice and ideal customer profile inform content
- Solo includes unlimited optimized drafts
What doesn't
- Solo starts at $99/month
- Agency pricing is not published
- Annual billing prices are not published
- Best for voice agentsPolyAIPolyAI
PolyAI is geared toward enterprises automating voice conversations, multichannel agents and custom voice-stack development. Its enterprise tooling makes it a candidate for complex voice programs, but no starting price is published. Request a quote and clarify what the platform includes before comparing its cost with other contact or service tools.
What works
- Agents span voice, chat, SMS and messaging
- Dialog Studio supports no-code through full-code
- Pre-built connectors and open APIs
What doesn't
- Platform prices are not published
- No free plan is listed
- API telephony and orchestration cost extra
- Best for enterprise supportKore.aiKore.ai
Kore.ai offers an enterprise toolkit for unifying service and employee support, coordinating multi-system processes and building internal assistants. No starting price is published, so buyers need custom pricing to judge value. It is most relevant to organizations prepared for that sales process, not teams seeking an easy, transparent price comparison.
What works
- Covers customer, employee, and process agents
- Supports multi-system workflows with audit trails
- Defines agent tools, guardrails, and handoffs
What doesn't
- Monthly and annual plan prices are not published
- Plan limits and inclusions are not published
- Enterprise pricing requires a custom quote
- Best for housing operationsEliseAIEliseAI
EliseAI covers communication workflows for housing operations and healthcare, including multilingual replies. Those use cases make it a specialist option rather than a general assistant for every business. Pricing is not published, leaving the business case unclear. Ask for a quote tied to the channels and workflows you actually plan to use.
What works
- Handles text, email, website chat and voice
- Automates responses, scheduling and follow-ups
- Supports written responses in 51 languages
What doesn't
- Starting price is not published
- Plan details and caps are not listed
- Monthly and annual billing terms are unpublished
- Best for patient requestsHyroHyro
Hyro is aimed at healthcare organizations with high patient contact volume, including scheduling, routine requests and proactive outreach. That focus may suit teams handling those workflows, but no starting price is published. Buyers should ask for pricing and confirm which patient interactions the quoted package covers before comparing it with alternatives.
What works
- Supports inbound and outbound interactions 24/7
- Handles phone, chat, and text
- Supports self-scheduling and specialty-specific rules
What doesn't
- Starting price is not published
- Monthly and annual billing terms are not published
- Pricing requires a custom quote
- Best for HR and ITLeena AILeena AI
Leena AI focuses on enterprise HR and IT support, including teams using ServiceNow and Workday and organizations building internal assistants. Its fit depends on those systems and enterprise needs. Pricing is not published, which makes the business case difficult to assess; request a quote and scope the workflows before shortlisting.
What works
- Pre-built assistants cover HR, IT, and finance
- Custom AI Colleagues support specific processes
- Lists 200+ pre-built integrations
What doesn't
- No public starting price or monthly billing
- AI Colleagues Platform charges per run by tokens
- Custom apps may require internally built APIs
- Best for appointment calls
ElionElion
Elion targets appointment-driven service businesses handling frequent inbound calls, with staff escalation as part of the fit. Its call workflows may suit teams that miss customer calls, but prices and overage rates are unclear. Get both in writing before comparing it with phone agents that publish an entry price.
What works
- Answers calls around the clock and handles WhatsApp messages
- Qualifies leads and books open calendar slots
- Saves call summaries and sends follow-ups
What doesn't
- Exact monthly prices aren't published in the published details
- USD pricing isn't published
- Overage rates aren't published
- Best for restaurant callsLomanLoman
Loman is built for restaurants that miss calls during service, take phone orders or reservations, and need multilingual phone lines. That narrow focus can make it more relevant than a general assistant for restaurants. Pricing is not published; contact sales for the cost before judging whether the workflow is worth adopting.
What works
- Handles orders, reservations and phone payments
- Answers common menu and operating-hours questions
- Supports 55 languages
What doesn't
- Plan prices are not published
- All listed plans require contacting the provider
- Starter caps calls handled at once at 50
- Best for voice programsAmeliaAmelia
Amelia is aimed at organizations building voice-native agents, with agent guardrails and live-interaction management. It is worth considering when those are central requirements, but the published information does not include a starting price. Get a quote and clarify what is included before comparing its value with other agent platforms.
What works
- Create agents from prompts or historical interaction data
- Customize voices, tone and response detail
- Set guardrails across instructions, tasks, functions and channels
What doesn't
- Starting price and billing terms aren't published
- Available pricing data lists no free plan
- Trial availability isn't published
- Best for credit unionsBond AIBond AI
Bond AI is aimed at banks and credit unions seeking performance forecasts, peer comparisons and deposit-growth insights. Its listed starting price is $99, but Autopilot pricing should be obtained before comparing the full cost with alternatives. This is a financial-institution shortlist candidate, not a general-purpose assistant for most businesses.
What works
- Forecasts financial performance for the next four quarters
- Includes peer benchmarking for institutions
- ARIA lets users ask questions about their institution
What doesn't
- Autopilot Analyst pricing is not published
- Autopilot Profit pricing is not published
- Annual billing prices are not published
- Best for finance analysisRogoRogo
Rogo targets financial institutions automating routine analysis and sharing governed firm context, with company-wide rollout as a use case. No starting price is published, and usage limits are also a key open question. Ask for both in writing before a commitment; without them, buyers cannot make a clean cost comparison.
What works
- Hundreds of purpose-built financial agents
- Connects firm systems, data, and knowledge
- Shared context is governed across the firm
What doesn't
- Enterprise pricing is quote-only
- No public starting price
- Seat and usage limits aren't published
- Best for tax researchTaxGPTTaxGPT
TaxGPT is aimed at tax professionals who need cited research, tax-workflow automation or help drafting tax-related communications. No starting price is published. Evaluate its research fit directly, but do not buy on roadmap promises or assume tax-preparation automation is proven; the published information does not establish that capability.
What works
- Product description lists cited federal, state and local tax research
- Drafts tax memos, IRS notice responses and client emails
- Analyzes tax returns, financial statements and IRS notices
What doesn't
- Monthly and annual prices are not published
- Reddit users report concerns about false positives in return review
- Some commenters say prep demonstrations did not show a live workflow
- Best for litigation teamsPaxton AIPaxton AI
Paxton AI focuses on record-heavy litigation, case-grounded drafting and research, with supported cloud-storage connectors. Its Individual plan starts at $249.92, making it an expensive option to assess against a specific legal workflow. The published information includes no Reddit feedback, so there is little user sentiment to weigh.
What works
- Finds relevant facts, gaps, and contradictions across case files.
- Drafts motions, briefs, discovery responses, and deposition outlines.
- Research considers matter facts, procedural posture, and jurisdiction.
What doesn't
- Individual costs $499 per user monthly.
- Annual Individual billing totals $2,999 per user.
- Enterprise pricing is custom and not published.
- Best for contact centersCognigy.AICognigy.AI
Cognigy.AI is designed for enterprise contact centers handling customers across channels and complex, governed service workflows. Its listed starting price is $3,590 annually, a high entry point that narrows its likely fit to larger programs. Public user feedback is limited, so compare the quote and requirements carefully before choosing.
What works
- Supports voice, chat and messaging
- Agents can act in connected systems
- Short- and long-term memory
What doesn't
- Basic reference contract is $43,080 annually
- No monthly billing price is published
- Basic tier caps usage at 60,000 conversations yearly
- Best for creator expertiseDelphiDelphi
Delphi lets creators share expertise through a digital version, with advice, training and integrations among its use cases. A free plan is available, but its listed starting price is $416.67, or $5,000 annually. Try the free plan first; that annual commitment is hard to justify without a defined use case.
What works
- Free plan lets you host a Delphi on the platform.
- Ask for perspectives across career, startups, health and more.
- Featured expert chats and example questions offer starting points.
What doesn't
- Paid pricing starts at $5,000 per year.
- Monthly prices are not published.
- Free-plan training-word and seat limits are not published.
- Best for live personalization
QuinQuin
Quin is for teams personalizing live visitor journeys using first-party clickstream data and custom engagement tools. That makes it a specialized marketing option, not a default business assistant. Pricing detail is too limited to assess value from the published information, so ask for a scoped quote before putting it on a shortlist.
What works
- Predicts likely next actions from in-session behavior
- Can personalize experiences for anonymous visitors
- Adapts on-page content and promotional overlays
What doesn't
- Starting price is not published
- Monthly and annual rates are not published
- Specific plan limits are not published
03How we chose
We weigh published pricing and plan limits, product documentation, and Reddit sentiment, with priority given to evidence that helps buyers compare real workflows and total cost. The published material for this draft names the category and vendors but includes no pricing pages, plan tables, documentation, or Reddit posts. We therefore cannot verify current prices, caps, supported workflows, or user reports, and we do not present a product ranking as established fact. We do not claim hands-on testing.
04Choose the task before the assistant
Start with one customer-facing or workplace task that has a clear owner and outcome. Write down what the assistant must do, what information it needs, when a person must take over, and how you will judge whether the workflow is useful. That makes it easier to compare tools without treating every product labeled “AI assistant” as interchangeable. For each candidate, check the documentation for supported workflows, integrations, setup requirements, and escalation controls. Confirm those details against your own process rather than assuming a feature name means the same thing across vendors. If the documentation does not answer a requirement, treat it as unverified and ask the vendor before committing. Keep the first use case narrow; expand only after you have a defined way to review outputs and handle failures.
05Compare the full cost and the operational limits
Do not compare assistants on a headline price alone. Check the published plan price, billing basis, included usage, and any stated caps or paid add-ons. If pricing or limits are not published, mark them as unknown and request a written quote; do not fill the gap with an estimate. Also check what the docs say about data handling, access controls, retention, deployment, and human review, then have the relevant security or operations owner confirm whether those terms fit your requirements. Before switching or adding a tool, map what it would replace and what would remain in your stack. A low visible price may not settle the decision if key requirements are unclear or require a separate plan. Use Reddit reports as context about buyer concerns, not as proof that a product will perform the same way for your team.
Questions people ask
How should we compare AI business assistant pricing?
Compare the published price and billing basis alongside included usage, plan caps, and paid add-ons. If a vendor does not publish a figure or limit, record it as unknown and request a quote. The published material for this draft contains no vendor pricing details to verify.
What should we check before choosing an AI assistant?
Start with the specific customer-facing or workplace task, then verify the workflow, integrations, setup requirements, and human handoff in the product documentation. Confirm security and data-handling terms with the appropriate internal owner. Treat any requirement the docs do not answer as unverified.
Can Reddit reviews tell us which assistant is best?
Reddit posts can surface questions and reported problems, but they are individual accounts, not proof that a tool will suit your workflow. Compare those reports with product documentation and published pricing. No Reddit posts were included in the published material for this draft.
Should we replace an existing tool with an AI assistant?
Only after mapping the task, cost, dependencies, and handoff process the existing tool covers. Check whether the candidate meets those requirements and what remains in your stack. If price, limits, or critical capabilities are unpublished, get clarification before making a switch decision.