We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
If you’re leaving Tempo, first pin down what you need to replace: portfolio planning, labor-cost tracking in Jira, or capacity modeling. The alternatives here cover different slices of that work, from shared workflows to enterprise portfolio planning. Their listed starting prices range from $8 to $10.99, while Planview has no published starting price in the published data. The published Reddit material doesn’t offer reliable reasons people leave Tempo’s portfolio product, so treat this as a fit-and-cost comparison—not a churn survey.
01Why people leave Tempo
No verified user complaints
The published Reddit results cover an iOS task app and a running shoe, not Tempo’s portfolio-planning product. They don’t establish why Tempo users leave.
Check the full-platform price
Tempo’s summary says to confirm the full-platform price before committing. The published information gives a starting price of $10, but no fuller price breakdown.
Confirm Jira licensing fit
Tempo’s summary flags Jira licensing fit as a point to confirm. The published information doesn’t specify compatibility or licensing terms for the alternatives.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Structured PMOs
SmartsheetSmartsheetSmartsheet is a close fit if your Tempo use centers on coordinating multiple projects, portfolio dashboards and resource planning across teams. Its listed starting price is $9. The published summary positions it for structured PMOs, making it worth comparing for portfolio work, though it doesn’t establish Jira labor-cost tracking or capacity-scenario modeling.
Trade-off: Less compelling if you want simple, low-cost project tracking.
6.7/10from
$9/mo - Enterprise portfolios
PlanviewPlanviewPlanview is aimed at large enterprises coordinating portfolios, modeling capacity and weighing investment trade-offs. That overlaps closely with Tempo’s stated portfolio-planning and capacity use cases. Its starting price is listed as n/a, however, and the published summary flags unclear cost and rough user reports, so treat it as a cautious shortlist rather than a cheap swap.
Trade-off: Cost is unclear, and user reports are described as rough.
4.8/10from
Custom - Cross-project workflows
AsanaAsanaAsana is worth considering if you need teams to coordinate work across projects, track goals and manage shared workflows. Its listed starting price is $10.99, with a free plan. That gives you a broad work-management option, but the published information doesn’t confirm portfolio capacity modeling or Jira labor-cost tracking as replacements.
Trade-off: Scrutinize higher tiers and custom enterprise pricing.
7.0/10from
$10.99/mofree plan - Visual workflows
monday.commonday.commonday.com fits teams building shared workflows, especially marketing and operations teams that want visual dashboards. The listed starting price is $8, with a free plan. It may suit workflow coordination better than portfolio-and-capacity planning; the published information doesn’t confirm it replaces Tempo’s Jira labor-cost or scenario-modeling use cases.
Trade-off: Check seat pricing and plan limits before moving.
6.5/10from
£8/mofree plan - Client capacity planning
Teamwork.comTeamwork.comTeamwork.com is a more relevant comparison if you use Tempo to plan staff capacity or forecast from logged hours for client work. Its listed starting price is $9.99, with a free plan. The published summary also points to agency project margins, but it doesn’t establish portfolio scenario modeling or Jira licensing fit.
Trade-off: Minimum seats and plan caps can raise the bill.
7.2/10from
$9.99/mofree plan - Consolidated work tools
ClickUpClickUpClickUp may suit teams trying to consolidate projects, docs, chat and time tracking in one tool. Its listed starting price is $9, with a free plan. That breadth could reduce tool sprawl, but the published summary notes user reports of complexity and reliability concerns, and doesn’t confirm a like-for-like replacement for Tempo’s portfolio planning.
Trade-off: Users report complexity and reliability concerns.
6.7/10from
$9/mofree plan - Product team tracking
LinearLinearLinear is a fit for product teams that want focused issue tracking and planning from idea to launch. Its listed starting price is $10, with a free plan. It may make sense if you’re switching away from a Jira-centered workflow, but the published information doesn’t establish portfolio planning, labor-cost tracking or capacity modeling as strengths.
Trade-off: Check reporting needs and annual pricing.
7.7/10from
$10/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | $10/mo | No | Teams planning work across portfolios | |
| 6.7 | $9/mo | No | PMOs coordinating multiple projects | |
| 4.8 | Custom | No | Large enterprises coordinating portfolios | |
| 7.0 | $10.99/mo | Yes | Teams coordinating cross-project work | |
| 6.5 | £8/mo | Yes | Teams building shared workflows | |
| 7.2 | $9.99/mo | Yes | Agencies tracking project margins | |
| 6.7 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating work tools | |
| 7.7 | $10/mo | Yes | Product teams wanting focused issue tracking |
Questions people ask
Do Reddit users explain why they leave Tempo?
Not in the published material. The Reddit results concern an iOS productivity app called Tempo and a running shoe, rather than the portfolio-planning product covered here. We can’t use them as evidence of Tempo customer complaints or switching reasons.
What should Jira teams check before switching from Tempo?
Confirm whether the alternative fits your Jira licensing and labor-cost workflow before moving. The published information flags Jira fit as a check for Tempo but doesn’t document Jira compatibility or licensing terms for these alternatives, so ask vendors for specifics rather than assuming feature parity.
Which listed alternative has the lowest starting price?
Among these picks, monday.com has the lowest listed starting price at $8 and includes a free plan. That is a comparison of the published starting-price figures, not a full-cost estimate. Check seat pricing and plan limits before comparing it with your current Tempo bill.
