We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
SimpleTexting starts at $33.2 on the pricing page, but the headline price is only a starting point: the brief warns that higher-volume texting needs a full-cost check. The clearest reasons to compare are workflow concerns, not proof that the platform fails: one Reddit user described image-only messages not reaching Slack through Zapier, and another thread raised bot-to-human handoff complexity. These alternatives suit different needs, so compare included credits, add-ons and quoted pricing before moving.
01Why people leave SimpleTexting
Higher-volume costs need checking
The published SimpleTexting summary recommends comparing full costs before committing to higher-volume texting; its starting price alone may not settle the decision.
Image-only Zapier notifications
One Reddit user said Zapier did not send a Slack notification when a customer’s SimpleTexting message contained only an image.
Bot-to-human handoff complexity
In one Reddit thread about an SMS chatbot, a commenter called handoff logic difficult and described configuring routing rules in n8n as a struggle.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Small-business campaigns
EZ TextingEZ TextingEZ Texting is listed for small businesses that want managed SMS campaigns, plus teams needing SMS and MMS or no-code workflows. Its listed starting price is $20, below SimpleTexting’s $33.2 starting figure. That makes it worth comparing for campaign basics, but check what the plan includes before treating the lower entry price as a lower total bill.
Trade-off: Included credits are tight, and add-ons can weaken the value.
6.6/10from
$20/mo - Operational alerts
Text-Em-AllText-Em-All
Text-Em-All is listed for operational alerts, fixed contact groups, and teams that need both voice and SMS. Its published starting price is $19, with a free plan listed. If your SimpleTexting use is mainly sending alerts rather than building marketing campaigns, this is a closer fit to evaluate; check contact limits and add-on costs against your sending pattern.
Trade-off: Contact caps and add-on costs may affect the total.
7.0/10from
$19/mofree plan - Variable SMS volume
TextMagicTextMagicTextMagic is listed for teams with variable SMS volume, customer follow-ups and permission-based campaigns. The published material describes pay-as-you-go pricing but gives no starting price, so ask for a cost estimate based on your message volume. It may suit teams that want to compare usage-based costs with SimpleTexting’s listed starting price.
Trade-off: Number, MMS and registration fees need checking.
7.2/10from
Custom - Occasional campaigns
TextedlyTextedlyTextedly is listed for small teams sending occasional campaigns, with two-way texting, automation, payments and reviews by text in its stated use cases. Its published starting price is $29, with a free plan listed. Compare its message caps with your actual sending needs before switching from SimpleTexting.
Trade-off: The published summary flags support complaints; weigh them before committing.
5.7/10from
$29/mofree plan - SMS revenue programs
PostscriptPostscriptPostscript is listed for brands building an SMS program, scaling SMS revenue and using AI-led marketing journeys. The published starting figure is $100, with a free plan listed. It is a different kind of fit from a small-business texting tool: consider it if your priority is a broader SMS marketing program, not just replacing a basic sending workflow.
Trade-off: Message fees and the $699 AI plan narrow its value.
6.2/10from
$100/mofree plan - SMS-led omnichannel
AttentiveAttentiveAttentive is listed for brands prioritizing SMS campaigns, teams wanting several messaging channels and marketers seeking managed flow support. Pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so get a quote and migration details in writing before comparing it with SimpleTexting’s listed starting price. Consider it when broader channel coverage matters to your decision.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published on the vendor's site.
6.8/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 SimpleTexting SimpleTexting (current) | 6.4 | $33.20/mo | No | Small businesses sending SMS campaigns |
| EZ Texting EZ Texting | 6.6 | $20/mo | No | Small businesses wanting managed SMS campaigns |
| Text-Em-All Text-Em-All | 7.0 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams sending operational alerts |
| TextMagic TextMagic | 7.2 | Custom | No | Teams with variable SMS volume |
| Textedly Textedly | 5.7 | $29/mo | Yes | Small teams sending occasional SMS campaigns |
| Postscript Postscript | 6.2 | $100/mo | Yes | Brands building an SMS program |
| Attentive Attentive | 6.8 | Custom | No | Brands prioritizing SMS campaigns |
Questions people ask
Which SimpleTexting alternative is best for a small business?
EZ Texting is listed for small businesses seeking managed SMS campaigns, SMS and MMS, and no-code workflows. Its published starting price is $20, compared with SimpleTexting’s $33.2. The summaries also flag tight included credits and add-on costs, so compare the full plan cost before choosing on price alone.
Which alternative is best for operational SMS alerts?
Text-Em-All is listed for operational alerts, fixed contact groups, and teams that need voice and SMS. Its published starting price is $19, with a free plan listed. Check contact caps and add-on costs against your use case; the published material does not give exact cap figures.
How should we compare SMS prices before switching?
Treat each listed starting price as a starting point, not a like-for-like total. Check included credits, message fees, add-ons, contact limits and any number, MMS or registration fees. For Attentive and TextMagic, the published material does not list a starting price; ask for a quote based on your needs.