We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Teamwork.com for client-service work where project costs, margins, time and resourcing need to sit together. Its Basics plan is listed at $9.99 per user/month annually, but requires three users; the free plan caps teams at five users and five projects. Choose Wrike for cross-team workflows, proofing and AI-oriented project coordination: Team is $10 per user/month annually for 2–15 users. Both offer free plans and 14-day trials; Wrike’s monthly-billed rates are not published.
01Side by side
| Teamwork.com | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Basics: $9.99/user/month annually; three-user minimum | Team: $10/user/month annually; 2–15 users |
| Free plan | Up to five users, five projects, 100MB storage | Free plan includes project and task management |
| Best for | Professional services teams managing client projects | Teams coordinating projects across departments |
| Core strength | Client costs, margins, time and resource planning | Workflows, proofing, resource planning and analytics |
| Learning curve | Review ease score: 7/10 | Review ease score: 6.8/10 |
| Integrations/data | Integrations; 150 API requests/minute on Basics and Accelerate | Business includes standard integration; extra products cost extra |
| Team/seat costs | Basics requires three seats; Accelerate requires five | Subscriptions sold in seat groups; limited-user rates unpublished |
| Support | Review support score: 6/10 | Review support score: 5.5/10 |
Teamwork.com Choose Teamwork.com if
- Choose Teamwork.com if client-project margins and costs matter.
- Choose Teamwork.com if you need time and resourcing forecasts.
- Choose Teamwork.com if a three-seat Basics minimum fits.
Wrike Choose Wrike if
- Choose Wrike if teams need proofing within project workflows.
- Choose Wrike if you want cross-team work management and analytics.
- Choose Wrike if its annual subscription and seat groups fit.
02Pricing compared
Teamwork.com Basics is $9.99 per user/month billed annually or $13.99 monthly, with a three-user minimum. It allows up to 300 projects, 100GB of storage and 5,000 automations per month. Its free plan caps teams at five users and five projects. Accelerate starts at $24.99 annually, with a five-user minimum; higher plans require custom quotes.
Wrike Team is $10 per user/month billed annually for 2–15 users. Business is $25 annually for 5–200 users; Pinnacle and Apex have custom pricing. Wrike sells subscriptions in seat groups, and rates for monthly billing and limited-user seats are not published. Both offer free plans and 14-day trials. Check the seat minimums and caps against your actual team size before comparing headline prices.
03Features and depth
Teamwork.com is the more directly client-services-focused option. It combines project and ticket management with time tracking, resource planning by skill or role, and tools to track costs, budgets and margins. Its reporting and forecasting use delivery and logged-work data. The product also lists AI agents for drafting reports, pricing work, summarizing information and flagging risks. That makes it a closer fit when project profitability is part of the work, not just task completion.
Wrike is positioned for coordinating projects across teams. Its feature set includes workflow automation, resource management, analytics and dashboards, plus online proofing and approval. Wrike Copilot can answer questions and summarize work; its AI agents handle repeatable tasks. On paid plans, Team lists AI Essentials, while Business lists AI Elite starter actions. Pinnacle adds advanced resource planning, budgeting and financial tracking; Apex includes Wrike Integrate and Wrike Sync. Those higher-tier capabilities come with custom pricing. Wrike’s feature mix is broader for cross-team workflows; Teamwork.com puts more emphasis on client-project costs and margins.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Our review scores put Teamwork.com at 7 for ease of use and Wrike at 6.8; those scores do not tell us how long setup takes or how either product feels in daily use. The Wrike review notes that setup overhead may be a concern, especially if a team does not need structured workflows. Teamwork.com’s minimum seats and project limits are more concrete points to check: Basics requires three users, while Free stops at five users and five projects. We would compare both against your real workflow and team size rather than assume either is simpler.
Questions people ask
Which is better for agencies or client-service teams?
Teamwork.com is the closer match when client projects, tracked hours, budgets, costs and margins need to be managed together. Its feature set is built around professional services work. Wrike can coordinate projects across teams, but the published details emphasize workflows, proofing and analytics rather than client profitability.
Which product is cheaper?
At the listed annual rate, Teamwork.com Basics is $9.99 per user/month and Wrike Team is $10. Teamwork.com requires at least three users; Wrike Team covers 2–15 users. Compare the total seat count and plan limits, not just the per-user price. Wrike monthly rates are not published.
Do Teamwork.com and Wrike have free plans or trials?
Both list a free plan and a 14-day trial. Teamwork.com Free allows up to five users and five projects, with 100MB of storage. The published Wrike Free details include project and task management, board and table views, and web, desktop and mobile apps; its user cap is not stated here.
Which is better for AI features and automation?
Both list AI and workflow capabilities, but the emphasis differs. Teamwork.com describes AI agents for reports, work pricing, summaries and risk flags. Wrike lists Copilot, AI agents and workflow automation; its paid plans specify AI Essentials or AI Elite actions. Higher AI Elite action packs have custom pricing.