We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
TeamGantt starts with a free Personal plan capped at one user, one project, and 40 tasks; its Base plan is $49.08/month billed annually or $59 monthly. Wrike also has a free plan, while Team starts at $10 per user/month billed annually; monthly rates aren’t published. Pick TeamGantt for visual scheduling and clearly stated project limits. Pick Wrike for AI features, workflow automation, resource management, and reporting—if annual billing and seat-group purchasing fit your team.
01Side by side
| TeamGantt | Wrike | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting paid price | $49.08/month annual; $59 monthly (Base) | $10/user/month, billed annually (Team) |
| Free plan | Yes: 1 user, 1 project, 40 tasks | Yes: project management, board and table views |
| Best for | Visual project schedules with clear task limits | Cross-team work management, AI, and workflows |
| Core strength | Gantt, kanban, calendar, dependencies, workload | AI, automation, resources, proofing, analytics |
| Learning curve | Review ease-of-use score: 7.5/10 | Review ease-of-use score: 6.8/10 |
| Integrations and data | Integration details not provided in published data | Standard integration; Integrate and Sync add-ons |
| Team and seat costs | Base: 1 manager, 10 collaborators; $49.08 annual | Per-user rates; subscriptions sold in seat groups |
| Support | Review support score: 5/10 | Review support score: 5.5/10 |
TeamGantt Choose TeamGantt if
- Choose TeamGantt if visual schedules are your main need.
- Choose TeamGantt if you want a free plan with stated caps.
- Choose TeamGantt if a set monthly price suits your team.
Wrike Choose Wrike if
- Choose Wrike if you need AI and workflow automation.
- Choose Wrike if resource planning and analytics matter.
- Choose Wrike if annual per-user pricing fits your budget.
02Pricing compared
TeamGantt’s free Personal plan is limited to one user, one project and 40 tasks. Its Base plan costs $59 per month, or $49.08 per month with annual billing, and includes five projects, one manager, 10 collaborators and 150 tasks per project. Business is $120 monthly or $95 annually, with a 20-project cap. Extra Business projects cost $24 monthly or $228 yearly each.
Wrike also has a free plan. Its Team plan starts at $10 per user per month, billed annually, for 2–15 users; Business is $25 per user per month, billed annually. Wrike’s monthly-billed rates are not published, and Business and higher require annual subscriptions. Seat purchases are grouped in blocks, so check the seat count before comparing totals. Wrike lists a 14-day free trial; TeamGantt does too.
03Features and depth
TeamGantt centers on visual scheduling: drag-and-drop Gantt charts, task dependencies, workload planning, baselines and progress tracking. Teams can also switch to kanban or calendar views, and share schedules that update as plans change. Its higher tiers increase project and task limits; Builder Edition adds construction-specific tools, while Enterprise lists SSO, advanced reporting and forecasting.
Wrike covers a broader work-management range. Its listed features include interactive Gantt charts on Team, plus AI Essentials, shareable dashboards and project management. Business adds AI Elite starter actions, templates and standard integrations. Across the platform, Wrike lists AI agents, Copilot, workflow automation, resource management, online proofing, analytics and dashboards. Pinnacle adds advanced resource and capacity planning, budgeting, financial tracking, reporting and BI; Apex adds Wrike Integrate and Sync. Those custom-priced tiers and paid add-ons make the full cost harder to compare from the published entry prices. TeamGantt’s review score favors visual scheduling; Wrike’s favors feature breadth.
04Ease of use and learning curve
TeamGantt’s focus on Gantt scheduling, dependencies and a small set of views makes its scope easier to judge before switching. The review rates its ease of use 7.5 out of 10, versus 6.8 for Wrike. That is a review score, not a promise that every team will find it simpler.
Wrike combines project work with AI, automation, resource management and analytics. The review notes setup overhead as a consideration, especially if the team only needs straightforward scheduling. Its Team plan is limited to 2–15 users, and seat groups can affect how many licenses you buy. If you need a visual schedule with explicit project caps, TeamGantt is the clearer fit; if you need the wider workflow set, factor in onboarding and configuration.
Questions people ask
Is TeamGantt cheaper than Wrike?
It depends on team size and billing. TeamGantt Base costs $49.08 per month with annual billing and includes up to 10 collaborators, while Wrike Team costs $10 per user per month billed annually for 2–15 users. Wrike’s monthly rates are not published, and seat groups can change the total.
Do TeamGantt and Wrike have free plans?
Yes. TeamGantt Personal is free for one user, one project and 40 tasks. Wrike Free includes project and task management, board and table views, and web, desktop and mobile apps. Both products list a 14-day free trial, according to the published pricing details.
Which tool is better for Gantt charts?
TeamGantt is built around visual scheduling, with drag-and-drop timelines, dependencies, workload planning and baseline tracking. Wrike also offers interactive Gantt charts on its Team plan. Choose based on whether you want scheduling as the main focus or as one part of a broader work-management platform.
Does Wrike require annual billing?
Wrike’s displayed Team and Business prices are per user per month when billed annually. The pricing details say monthly-billed rates are not published, and Business and higher require annual subscriptions. TeamGantt lists both monthly and annual billing for its paid plans.