search legion

Head-to-head · Project management

Asana vs Wrike

Wrike costs less to start; Asana offers a Starter plan without user seat limits.

Asana

7.0/10
VS

Wrike

7.1/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Wrike.

Wrike is the lower-priced paid entry point at $10 per user/month billed annually, versus Asana Starter at $10.99. Choose Wrike for resource management, online proofing, analytics, and structured workflows; its paid plans have user ranges and seat-group rules. Choose Asana for goals, portfolios, and a Starter plan with no user seat limit. Both offer free plans. Wrike’s review score is 7.1 versus Asana’s 7.0, but neither score settles plan fit.

01Side by side

AsanaWrike
Starting priceStarter: $10.99/user/month, billed annuallyTeam: $10/user/month, billed annually
Free planPersonal: free for 2 usersFree plan for individuals and small teams
Best forGoals, portfolios, and resource managementStructured workflows, resourcing, and reporting
Core strengthWork Graph connects tasks, people, projects, and goalsProofing, automation, resource management, and analytics
Learning curveEase-of-use review score: 7/10Ease-of-use review score: 6.8/10
Integrations and data100+ free integrations; Enterprise+ offers audit logsBusiness includes standard integration; Wrike Integrate costs extra
Team and seat costsStarter has no user seat limitsSeat groups apply; limited-user rates are unpublished
SupportReview support score: 5/10Review support score: 5.5/10

Choose Asana if

  • Choose Asana if you need goals, portfolios, and resource management.
  • Choose Asana if Starter’s no-seat-limit policy fits your team.
  • Choose Asana if 100+ free integrations on Personal matter.

Choose Wrike if

  • Choose Wrike if the lower annual starting price matters.
  • Choose Wrike if you need online proofing and analytics.
  • Choose Wrike if resource planning and workload views are priorities.

02Pricing compared

Wrike is cheaper at the paid entry point: Team is $10 per user per month, billed annually, compared with Asana Starter at $10.99 per user per month, billed annually. Asana also lists Starter at $13.49 with monthly billing; Wrike’s monthly-billed rates are not published. Asana Starter has no user seat limit, while Wrike Team is for 2–15 users. Wrike Business costs $25 per user per month, billed annually, and covers 5–200 users; Business and higher require annual subscriptions. Wrike also sells seats in groups of 5, 10, or 25 depending on team size, which can affect the total bill. Both products have free plans. Asana Personal supports two users, while Wrike’s free plan is listed for individuals and small teams. Wrike Pinnacle, Apex, Asana Enterprise, and Enterprise+ use custom pricing.

03Features and depth

Choose by the work you need to coordinate, not by the shared project-management label. Asana centers on its Work Graph, linking people, tasks, projects, goals, and dependencies. Its planning tools turn briefs into tasks, owners, timelines, and dependencies; Advanced adds goals, portfolios, and resource management. Asana also offers AI Teammates and AI Studio credits, with 75,000 monthly credits on Starter and 200,000 on Advanced, per billing account.

Wrike emphasizes structured delivery across teams. Its listed capabilities include workflow automation, resource and workload management, online proofing, analytics, and dashboards. Team includes interactive Gantt charts; Business adds work templates, while Pinnacle adds advanced resource and capacity planning, budgeting, and reporting. Wrike also lists AI agents and Copilot. Both products cover workflows and AI, but the included tools and plan limits differ. Wrike is the clearer fit if proofing and reporting matter; Asana has the more explicit goals-and-portfolios offer on its Advanced plan.

04Ease of use and learning curve

The review scores put Asana slightly ahead for ease of use: 7.0 versus Wrike at 6.8. That is a narrow difference, not a guarantee that either will feel simpler for your team. Asana’s shared workspace connects tasks, projects, goals, and dependencies, while its higher tiers add more planning and governance options. Wrike’s feature set includes workflows, resource planning, proofing, and analytics, and its review notes setup overhead as a consideration. Those capabilities can suit teams with structured delivery needs, but they also mean more to configure and manage. Try each free plan against one real workflow before committing; Wrike also lists a 14-day trial.

Questions people ask

Is Asana similar to ClickUp?

Both names come up in searches for work management software, but the published information does not describe ClickUp’s features or pricing, so we can’t make a grounded feature-by-feature comparison. Asana is described here as a shared workspace for tasks, projects, goals, dependencies, and workflows.

What are the top 3 project management tools?

There is no sourced ranking here that establishes a top three. This comparison covers Asana and Wrike: both offer free plans, while Wrike has the lower listed paid starting price. The better fit depends on the features and plan limits your team needs.

Is Asana free for 2 people?

Yes. Asana’s Personal plan is free and lists support for two users, with unlimited tasks and projects, 100 MB per file, and more than 100 free integrations. The listed plan is aimed at individuals and pairs managing personal projects.

Which is better, Jira or Asana?

The published information does not include Jira’s pricing, features, or plan limits, so we can’t support a direct verdict. Asana’s listed strengths include goals, portfolios, dependencies, and a free two-user Personal plan. Compare Jira’s current plan details against those needs before switching.