We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Small Improvements starts at $3 per user monthly, billed annually, and its listing notes minimum seat requirements. If those terms are the sticking point, these alternatives range from core HR platforms to global payroll and hourly-workforce tools—but they are not all like-for-like performance-management replacements. The published Reddit results discuss home repairs and tabletop games, not Small Improvements, so they do not establish why customers leave. Compare the job you need done before treating a lower starting price as a replacement.
01Why people leave Small Improvements
Minimum seats may not fit
The listing targets companies with 20 or more employees and notes minimum seat requirements. Smaller teams should confirm the required commitment before comparing costs.
Annual billing limits flexibility
The listed $3 per-user monthly price is billed annually. The source does not publish a monthly-billing option or contract terms.
Your needs have broadened
If the brief now includes payroll, benefits, scheduling or global hiring, compare tools positioned for those jobs. Small Improvements is listed as a performance suite.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- HR and payroll
RipplingRipplingRippling is worth comparing if your switch is about consolidating workforce tools rather than replacing performance management alone. Its listing describes modular workforce tools, HR and payroll, and support for global employees. The listed starting price is $8, above Small Improvements’ $3 annual-billed entry price, and total pricing is unclear—so ask for a full quote before treating the starting figure as your budget.
Trade-off: You give up a clearly positioned performance suite; Rippling’s total pricing is unclear.
6.2/10from
$8/mo - Core HR and hiring
BambooHRBambooHRChoose BambooHR for a comparison centered on employee records, hiring and onboarding. Its listing gives a $10.25 starting price and says base rates are published, which makes an initial price check easier than with quote-only options. But the listing also warns that add-ons are unpriced, so the base rate may not represent the cost of the toolkit you need.
Trade-off: The listed starting price is higher, and add-on prices are not published.
6.7/10from
$10.25/mo - Hourly team operations
ConnecteamConnecteamConnecteam is a closer fit when the team you support is hourly and needs scheduling and time tracking alongside other workforce tools. Its listing includes a free starting plan and a $29 starting price, and positions it for businesses replacing several tools. Check hub costs and reporting requirements before comparing it with Small Improvements’ annual-billed entry price.
Trade-off: Check hub costs and reporting needs; it is positioned around workforce tools.
6.8/10from
$29/mofree plan - Global hiring and payroll
DeelDeelDeel is worth a look if international hiring or contractor management is now part of the brief. Its listing covers employees across borders, contractors in multiple countries, and payroll and HR in one platform. The listed starting price is $14, but EOR is priced separately at $599 per employee monthly, so distinguish that service from the entry price.
Trade-off: EOR costs $599 per employee monthly, and support feedback is mixed.
6.3/10from
$14/mo - Complex workforce needs
UKG ProUKG ProUKG Pro may fit organizations looking to consolidate HR and payroll while handling complex workforce schedules, including union scheduling. Its listing does not publish a starting price, so this is a quote-led comparison rather than a way to quickly verify savings against Small Improvements’ $3 annual-billed entry price. Check employee-experience feedback before moving forward.
Trade-off: Pricing is quote-only; check employee-experience feedback before switching.
5.8/10from
Custom - Broad HCM coverage
DayforceDayforceConsider Dayforce if your evaluation has expanded to broad HCM coverage or global payroll. Its listing is aimed at organizations seeking those capabilities, but pricing is not published and the summary notes user complaints about usability and reporting. That makes it a platform to scrutinize with a quote and product-fit questions, not an easy price-based substitute.
Trade-off: Pricing is quote-only, with reported usability and reporting complaints.
4.4/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Small Improvements Small Improvements (current) | 7.2 | $3/mo | No | Companies with 20 or more employees |
| Rippling Rippling | 6.2 | $8/mo | No | Teams consolidating HR and payroll |
| BambooHR BambooHR | 6.7 | $10.25/mo | No | Teams consolidating core HR records |
| Connecteam Connecteam | 6.8 | $29/mo | Yes | Small teams needing a free starting plan |
| Deel Deel | 6.3 | $14/mo | No | Companies hiring employees across borders |
| UKG Pro UKG Pro | 5.8 | Custom | No | Organizations consolidating HR and payroll |
| Dayforce Dayforce | 4.4 | Custom | No | Organizations seeking broad HCM coverage |
Questions people ask
What are your suggestions for improvement?
Start by naming the problem you need the switch to solve: minimum seats, annual billing, or a need for broader HR and workforce tools. Then compare the relevant listed starting prices and confirm what is included. The alternatives here are not all positioned as performance-management replacements, so verify that specific requirement before choosing.
What is another word for “small improvements”?
Depending on what you mean, try “minor upgrades,” “incremental changes,” or “small refinements.” For a software search, “performance management alternatives” is more specific than “small improvements” and is less likely to return unrelated home-improvement results.
What are the 5 best tools for performance management?
The published alternatives do not identify five performance-management tools. They cover broader HR, payroll, benefits, scheduling and workforce needs, and the listings do not establish that they replace Small Improvements’ performance suite. We would not rank them as performance-management products without evidence about those capabilities.