We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
If you’re leaving Relay.app, choose a replacement by testing your hardest workflow—not by counting integrations. A Reddit thread says users received an email that Relay.app was shutting down, and commenters describe rebuilding client workflows. Some valued Relay’s clean, approachable interface; others found Make’s migration help and setup disappointing. Our shortlist ranges from free plans and low starting prices to enterprise-grade process tools. Check each option against your key apps, approval steps, and the amount of technical setup your team can handle.
01Why people leave Relay.app
Shutdown concerns
A Reddit thread says users received an email that Relay.app was shutting down, prompting some to move client workflows.
A hard-to-replace interface
Relay users praised its clean UI and ease of use; one commenter said Make felt less intuitive.
Migration uncertainty
One commenter described Make’s migration tool and support as unhelpful. Plan to verify every workflow rather than assume a clean transfer.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierZapier is the closest shortlist fit if Relay’s value was connecting many apps without much technical setup. The pricing page describes its integration coverage as the widest and says it suits non-technical users building simple workflows. Its listed starting price is $19.99, with a free plan. A Reddit commenter moving from Relay said Zapier felt similar, while another praised its app coverage.
Trade-off: Task-based pricing can get expensive, according to Reddit users.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Technical workflow control
MakeMakeMake is worth considering if you want more control over workflows and have someone comfortable with technical configuration. Its listing highlights custom JavaScript or Python, governance, and AI-agent workflows. The listed starting price is $12, with a free plan. One Relay user said Make’s migration tool and support were unhelpful, so treat rebuilding as a separate project.
Trade-off: A Relay user found it unintuitive; its credit meter may not suit light use.
7.0/10from
$12/mofree plan - AI and self-hosting
n8nn8nChoose n8n if your team can manage infrastructure and wants to mix predictable workflow steps with AI calls. The listing says it suits developers comfortable with self-hosting and teams needing audited, re-runnable steps. Its listed starting price is $20, with a free plan. Use your most demanding workflow as a fit check before switching.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - Low-cost simple automations
IFTTTIFTTTIFTTT is a lower-cost option for straightforward app-to-app connections, rather than a like-for-like choice for complex workflows. Its listing says it also suits smart-home connections and trying automations on a free plan. The listed starting price is $2.09. Check whether its credit limits and polling speeds fit your actual workflow before moving anything important.
Trade-off: Credit limits and polling speeds may not fit time-sensitive workflows.
6.8/10from
$2.09/mofree plan - Microsoft workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate is a sensible shortlist option if your team already works in Microsoft 365. Its listing names Microsoft 365 automation, HR onboarding, approvals, and attended desktop RPA as use cases. The listed starting price is $15. It is a more targeted choice than a general replacement, so assess it against your Microsoft-centric processes first.
Trade-off: Bot and process-mining plans can limit value beyond Microsoft-centric use.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Developer-built integrations
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream fits teams with developers building API-heavy integrations or AI agents, rather than users prioritizing visual simplicity. Its listing highlights managed OAuth and production integrations across many APIs. The listed starting price is $99, with a free plan. Review production-user, usage, and free-tier limits against your expected workload before committing.
Trade-off: Budget carefully for production users, usage, and free-tier limits.
7.0/10from
$99/mofree plan - Complex approval workflows
DecisionsDecisionsDecisions is the high-cost option to consider when Relay’s human review steps are part of a broader, complex process. Its listing targets mid-market process automation, cross-system orchestration, rules, and human review. The listed starting price is $4,000. That makes it a poor default for a small workflow, but potentially relevant when process depth matters more than price.
Trade-off: Starting price is $4,000; get a quote before budgeting.
6.2/10from
$4,000/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Relay.app Relay.app (current) | 6.5 | $19/mo | Yes | Small workflows needing human approval |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| Make Make | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| IFTTT IFTTT | 6.8 | $2.09/mo | Yes | Simple app-to-app automations |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.0 | $99/mo | Yes | Teams building AI agents |
| Decisions Decisions | 6.2 | $4,000/mo | No | Mid-market process automation teams |
Questions people ask
Which Relay.app alternative is the cheapest?
Among the listed starting prices, IFTTT is lowest at $2.09 and has a free plan. Make starts at $12 with a free plan, while Zapier starts at $19.99 with a free plan. These are listed starting prices, not a comparison of what your workflow will cost.
Which alternative should I choose for Attio?
The published materials don’t confirm which alternatives currently support your Attio workflow. A Reddit thread identifies Attio as important to one Relay user, but that isn’t proof of support elsewhere. Before switching, ask the vendor or check its current integration documentation, then test the exact workflow and any approval steps.
How should I migrate Relay.app workflows?
A commenter in a Reddit thread advised exporting Relay workflows before a deadline and testing the hardest workflow with each candidate. Inventory the apps, branches, credentials, and approval steps your processes depend on, then rebuild and verify them in the replacement. The published materials don’t establish a direct migration path for these alternatives.