We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Quartzy’s pricing is the sticking point for some academic labs: our comparison lists it from $50, with a $600 annual starting cost for academic teams. In one Reddit thread, users objected to paying when institutional contracts beat Quartzy’s prices; another commenter said the discounted cost topped $1,000 for their lab. The alternatives below focus on procurement workflows. Their published profiles do not confirm Quartzy-style lot, expiration-date or inventory tracking, so verify those requirements before switching.
01Why people leave Quartzy
Academic subscription costs
A Reddit thread says academic users were moved to paid service. One commenter called the discounted cost—over $1,000 a year for their lab—a non-starter.
Ordering value falls short
One user said their institution’s contracts beat Quartzy’s prices 90% of the time, making a paid ordering tool harder to justify.
Inventory needs remain central
Users value searching stock, order history and expiration status. One Reddit post described moving back to a large Excel table after leaving Quartzy.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Guided procurement requests
ZipZipConsider Zip if your main reason for leaving is organizing purchasing requests rather than tracking lab stock. Its profile describes procurement orchestration, guided request intake, and supplier and contract processes. That is a different emphasis from Quartzy’s lab purchasing and inventory use. Zip’s pricing is not published in our comparison, so request a quote before treating it as a lower-cost replacement.
Trade-off: Pricing is unpublished; lab inventory and lot tracking are not confirmed.
6.3/10from
Custom - Broad spend workflows
CoupaCoupaCoupa may suit larger procurement and finance teams that need broad spend workflows or use its supplier network. Our comparison lists it from $41.58 and notes a free plan, but that does not establish the cost or fit of the core platform. Compare a quote with Quartzy’s academic price, and confirm whether Coupa covers the lab inventory work your team relies on.
Trade-off: Core-platform value needs a quote; lab inventory coverage is not confirmed.
6.0/10from
$41.58/mofree plan - Centralized purchasing
Order.coOrder.coOrder.co is worth evaluating if you want to centralize purchasing and payments, with catalog and approval controls. Its profile describes coverage across the purchasing lifecycle, which may help teams whose Quartzy use is mostly ordering. Our comparison lists no starting price, and it does not confirm lot, expiration-date or inventory tracking, so check both before planning a migration.
Trade-off: Pricing is unpublished; inventory-tracking fit is unclear.
6.0/10from
Custom - Purchasing approvals
ProcurifyProcurifyProcurify fits teams formalizing purchasing approvals and connecting requests with accounts payable. Its profile also names budget management across locations, making it a candidate when the problem is controlling spend rather than cataloging lab stock. Our comparison gives no starting price or plan limits. Ask for both, and confirm whether you need a separate tool for inventory and expiration dates.
Trade-off: Pricing and plan limits are unclear; lab inventory is not confirmed.
6.0/10from
Custom - Multi-site procurement
DSSIDSSI
DSSI is aimed at multi-site procurement teams managing indirect and MRO spend, with invoice workflows in its listed coverage. That may be a better match than Quartzy for organizations trying to coordinate purchasing across sites. Our comparison gives no starting price, and it does not describe lab inventory tracking. Get a detailed quote and verify whether a separate inventory system is needed.
Trade-off: Requires a detailed quote; lot and expiration tracking are not confirmed.
6.2/10from
Custom - Enterprise source-to-pay
SAP AribaSAP AribaSAP Ariba is the broadest fit here for enterprise procurement teams seeking source-to-pay coverage or working in SAP-centered operations. Our comparison lists it from $4.17 and notes a free plan, but buyer pricing is described as opaque. That starting figure alone cannot settle the cost comparison with Quartzy; confirm the relevant plan, limits and inventory requirements with the vendor.
Trade-off: Buyer pricing is opaque, and the published profile flags usability concerns.
5.2/10from
$4.17/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | $50/mo | No | Labs consolidating purchasing and inventory | |
| 6.3 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating procurement workflows | |
| 6.0 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Large procurement and finance teams | |
| 6.0 | Custom | No | Businesses centralizing purchasing and payments | |
| 6.0 | Custom | No | Teams formalizing purchasing approvals | |
| DSSI DSSI | 6.2 | Custom | No | Multi-site procurement teams |
| 5.2 | $4.17/mo | Yes | Enterprise procurement teams |
Questions people ask
Why are labs leaving Quartzy?
In a Reddit thread, academic users objected to Quartzy moving to paid service, with one commenter saying the discounted price exceeded $1,000 a year for their lab. Others said institutional contracts beat Quartzy’s prices or described returning to spreadsheets. Those are user reports, not a universal account of Quartzy pricing.
Which Quartzy alternative has a free plan?
Our comparison notes a free plan for Coupa and SAP Ariba, with starting figures of $41.58 and $4.17 respectively. It does not specify the free plans’ limits or confirm that either includes lab inventory tracking. Check the current plan details and get a quote before comparing total costs.
Can these tools track lab lots and expiration dates?
The published profiles for these six alternatives do not confirm lot, expiration-date or lab inventory tracking. They focus on procurement, approvals, spend workflows, supplier processes or invoices. If those Quartzy features matter, ask vendors to confirm them directly and plan for a separate inventory system if they are not included.
