We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Paperpile’s published profile puts its starting price at $8.3, with an annual-only entry point, and highlights its Google Docs workflow. That makes the switch less obvious if citations inside Docs are your main need. The alternatives here cover nearby jobs—reference libraries, LaTeX writing, shared notes and document review—but the published information does not establish that most replace Paperpile’s citation workflow. One Reddit thread describes Paperpile being blocked mid-review; treat that as an individual account, not evidence of a widespread problem.
01Why people leave Paperpile
Institution access may change
One Reddit poster says their university blocked Paperpile during a review. It is an individual report, but a reason to check who controls access.
Annual-only entry point
The published Paperpile profile lists an $8.3 starting price and an annual-only entry point, which may not suit users who want a different commitment.
Your workflow may have changed
Paperpile is described as strong for Google Docs. If your priority is LaTeX writing, a large reference library or shared team knowledge, compare tools built around those jobs.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Large reference libraries
EndNoteEndNoteEndNote is the closest listed alternative when the main job is managing references: its profile highlights large libraries, shared research libraries and many citation styles. The listed starting price is $140. That is a different price point from Paperpile’s $8.3 entry point, so compare the cost against the features you actually need before switching.
Trade-off: The published profile flags clunky-use reports and a higher listed starting price.
6.0/10from
€140/mo - Shared LaTeX writing
OverleafOverleafOverleaf fits researchers co-writing LaTeX documents, students using shared article templates and teams that want browser-based LaTeX editing. Its listed starting price is $8.25, with a free plan. Choose it if document collaboration and LaTeX matter more than keeping Paperpile’s Google Docs-centered workflow; the published information does not establish it as a reference-manager replacement.
Trade-off: It is a LaTeX editor, not a documented replacement for Paperpile’s citation workflow.
7.5/10from
$8.25/mofree plan - Shared research notes
NotionNotionNotion is a better fit if your team wants notes and project information in a flexible shared workspace, rather than a tool centered on references. Its profile lists a free plan and a starting price of $9.5. It may suit teams interested in AI-assisted workflows, but the published information does not say it replaces Paperpile’s citation features.
Trade-off: Flexible shared workspaces do not equal a dedicated reference manager.
7.0/10from
€9.50/mofree plan - Document review teams
PleaseReviewPleaseReviewPleaseReview is aimed at regulated document review, large groups editing complex documents, and workflows needing audit trails or redaction. That makes it relevant if your reason for leaving Paperpile is a review process rather than reference management. Pricing is not published in the published profile, so get a quote before treating it as a cost-effective switch.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and the profile does not position it as a citation tool.
6.7/10from
Custom - Salesforce document workflows
QuipQuipQuip is worth considering when your documents need to live inside Salesforce. Its profile also lists documents, sheets, chat and process templates, with a starting price of $10. That is a narrow fit for Paperpile users: the published details do not establish citation management or a Google Docs-style research workflow.
Trade-off: The strongest fit is Salesforce teams, not general-purpose research writing.
6.3/10from
$10/mo - Shared team knowledge
SlabSlabSlab is a knowledge base for teams centralizing company information, with a free plan and a listed starting price of $6.67. It may work if Paperpile was serving as a shared place for team knowledge rather than as your citation manager. Check the plan limits and annual commitment before moving a team workspace over.
Trade-off: It is a knowledge base; plan limits and annual commitment need checking.
7.0/10from
$6.67/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Paperpile Paperpile (current) | 6.3 | $8.30/mo | No | Researchers writing in Google Docs |
| EndNote EndNote | 6.0 | €140/mo | No | Researchers managing large reference libraries |
| Overleaf Overleaf | 7.5 | $8.25/mo | Yes | Researchers co-writing LaTeX documents |
| Notion Notion | 7.0 | €9.50/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating notes and project information |
| PleaseReview PleaseReview | 6.7 | Custom | No | Regulated document review teams |
| Quip Quip | 6.3 | $10/mo | No | Salesforce teams embedding live documents |
| Slab Slab | 7.0 | $6.67/mo | Yes | Teams centralizing company knowledge |
Questions people ask
Which Paperpile alternative is closest to a reference manager?
EndNote is the closest fit among these picks: its profile specifically covers large reference libraries, shared research libraries and citation styles. The listed starting price is $140. The published details do not confirm that the other options reproduce Paperpile’s citation workflow.
Is there a free Paperpile alternative here?
Notion, Overleaf and Slab list free plans in the published profiles. They cover shared workspaces, LaTeX writing and team knowledge, respectively; the profiles do not describe them as direct reference-manager replacements. Compare the job you need done, not just whether a free plan is listed.
Can these alternatives keep Paperpile’s Google Docs workflow?
The published Paperpile profile calls out its Google Docs workflow, but the alternative profiles do not establish equivalent Google Docs integration. Overleaf is listed for browser-based LaTeX editing, while EndNote is listed for reference libraries and citation styles. Confirm integrations before moving an active writing project.