We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Laurel is positioned for professional services firms tracking billable work, checking timekeeping compliance and analyzing matter or engagement profitability. Its main drawback in the published information is opaque enterprise pricing: no Laurel price is listed. The published Reddit material is about the town of Laurel and an HGTV show, not the software, so it does not establish why customers leave. These six alternatives cover billable time, project financials and workforce tracking, with listed starting prices where available.
01Why people leave Laurel
You need a price to compare
Laurel's price is not provided here. The alternatives below list starting prices, though those figures do not show every tier or total cost.
Your work is project-led
If your priority is linking tracked hours to billing or project financials, compare BigTime and Harvest against Laurel's matter and engagement focus.
You need different workforce coverage
For distributed teams or broader workforce analytics, Hubstaff and Insightful are alternatives, but their published summaries do not establish matter-profitability features.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Professional services
BigTimeBigTimeBigTime is the closest fit in this list for firms that want to connect time with billing and track project financials. Its published description specifically targets professional-services firms, making it the most direct comparison to Laurel's billable-work and engagement-profitability use case. The listed starting price is $20.
Trade-off: The $20 entry price and undisclosed tiers make total cost harder to judge.
6.5/10from
$20/mo - Time and invoicing
HarvestHarvestHarvest is worth comparing if the practical need is tracking billable client work and combining time with invoicing. The published summary also names freelancers with a few projects as a fit. Its listed starting price is $9, with a free plan noted; compare the paid-plan cost before switching from Laurel.
Trade-off: The published summary flags paid-plan costs for scrutiny.
6.8/10from
$9/mofree plan - Billable project time
Toggl TrackToggl TrackToggl Track targets teams tracking billable project work and offers time and profitability reports, according to the published product summary. That makes it a relevant alternative for firms assessing project economics, though the summary does not specify matter-level reporting. Pricing starts at $9, and a free plan is listed.
Trade-off: Check paid tiers and reported sync feedback before switching.
7.0/10from
$9/mofree plan - Low-cost time tracking
ClockifyClockifyClockify is the budget-oriented option here for small teams that need to record billable project time and use timesheets and reporting. Its listed starting price is $3.99, with a free plan. That is a lower stated entry point than the other listed project-time options, but it is not proof of equivalent Laurel functionality.
Trade-off: Check the five-user cap and paid feature gates.
7.0/10from
$3.99/mofree plan - Distributed billable teams
HubstaffHubstaffHubstaff is aimed at distributed teams tracking billable hours, paying contractors across countries and planning project capacity. Consider it if those needs matter more than Laurel's matter and engagement focus. Its listed starting price is $10; the published summary also notes that monthly pricing is unpublished.
Trade-off: The summary flags privacy concerns and unpublished monthly pricing.
6.3/10from
$10/mo - Workforce analytics
InsightfulInsightfulInsightful is a broader alternative if your reason to switch is time and attendance tracking or analyzing app and AI use, rather than matter profitability alone. Its published summary also lists work-process mapping. Pricing starts at $8, with a free plan noted, but the published details do not establish billable-project reporting.
Trade-off: Check tier limits and screenshot settings before rollout.
7.0/10from
$8/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Laurel Laurel (current) | 6.1 | Custom | No | Professional services firms tracking billable work |
| BigTime BigTime | 6.5 | $20/mo | No | Professional-services firms |
| Harvest Harvest | 6.8 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams tracking billable client work |
| Toggl Track Toggl Track | 7.0 | $9/mo | Yes | Teams tracking billable project work |
| Clockify Clockify | 7.0 | $3.99/mo | Yes | Small teams tracking hours for free |
| Hubstaff Hubstaff | 6.3 | $10/mo | No | Distributed teams tracking billable hours |
| Insightful Insightful | 7.0 | $8/mo | Yes | Teams tracking time and attendance |
Questions people ask
Which Laurel alternative is the closest fit for a professional services firm?
BigTime is the closest match in this list based on the published descriptions: it targets professional-services firms and links time to billing and project financial tracking. Laurel is positioned around billable work and matter or engagement profitability. The published information does not confirm that BigTime has identical matter-level features.
Which Laurel alternative has the lowest listed starting price?
Clockify has the lowest listed starting price among these picks at $3.99, and a free plan is noted. The published summary warns about a five-user cap and paid feature gates. Compare the plan limits and required features, not just the starting figure, before treating it as the cheaper option.
Do Reddit users report why they are leaving Laurel software?
The published Reddit material does not establish software customer complaints. The included threads discuss the town of Laurel and an HGTV show, not the professional-services timekeeping product. The stated drawback for the software is opaque enterprise pricing; no customer-reported software reasons are provided.