Hireflix review

Hireflix is one-way video interview software for screening and recruiting. A hiring team sets questions, then candidates record their answers on their own schedule instead of booking a live screening call. The team can review responses later and share them with colleagues or clients.

You can reuse an interview for multiple candidates and tailor questions to different roles. Hireflix also lists ATS integration, so it is designed to fit into an existing recruiting setup rather than replace the applicant tracking system. The published product information does not name specific ATS connectors.

The distinction is simple: Hireflix handles recorded first-round responses, not the full hiring process. It can reduce the need to coordinate screening calls, but teams still have to review the recordings and decide who moves forward.

The workflow is focused: prepare questions once, invite candidates, and review their recorded answers when the hiring team is available. That can be useful when candidates and interviewers have conflicting schedules or when a role attracts a large applicant pool. Reusable interviews and role-specific questions also make it easier to keep screening prompts consistent while adapting them to each vacancy.

The pricing page lists unlimited user seats, positions and interview responses on both published plans. Small costs $75 per month when billed yearly for companies with fewer than 50 employees; Medium is $150 per month when billed yearly for companies with 50 to 250 employees. Both include all features, so the published plans do not split core features into separate tiers. Hireflix also offers a one-month free trial, though there is no free plan.

For larger or higher-volume hiring, a Custom plan is available and includes tailored service. Its price is not published.

Pricing is only partly transparent. The $75 and $150 monthly figures apply when billed yearly; monthly-billing prices are not published. Custom pricing requires contacting Hireflix, so buyers cannot compare that tier’s cost from the listed prices alone. Small and Medium are separated by company size, not a published usage threshold: both list unlimited seats, positions and interview responses.

That unlimited language does not answer every buying question. The published pricing information does not publish limits for interview questions, recording length or storage, and it does not name the ATS integrations. Those details matter if a team needs specific controls or must confirm compatibility before switching. Ask Hireflix directly rather than assuming the listed ATS integration covers your system.

Hireflix is also a narrow tool: it records and shares screening answers. The product information does not describe live interviews or broader recruiting functions, so teams should not treat it as a replacement for their ATS or the rest of their hiring workflow.

Hireflix lists Small at $75 per month, billed yearly, for companies with fewer than 50 employees. Medium is $150 per month, billed yearly, for companies with 50 to 250 employees—a $75 monthly increase, or double the Small price. Both plans include unlimited user seats, positions and interview responses, plus all features.

Custom pricing is for corporates, agencies and high-volume hiring; Hireflix does not publish a price, so you’ll need to contact the company. The published pricing details list no add-ons. There is a one-month free trial, but no ongoing free plan. The billing catch: monthly-billing prices for Small and Medium are not published, so the listed monthly figures are annual-billing rates, not confirmed month-to-month costs. If you need monthly flexibility or have more than 250 employees, the public pricing page does not give enough information to calculate your cost.

Switching to Hireflix means setting up role-specific questions and reusable interview templates, then inviting candidates to record answers asynchronously. The product description says teams can review and share responses, and connect Hireflix with an existing ATS. It does not specify migration services, what candidate records or videos can be imported, or how to export data if you leave. Confirm those points before moving active hiring workflows; data portability and migration effort are not published on the vendor's site.

Leaving could mean rebuilding interview questions and deciding how to retain or transfer recorded responses, but the available sources do not establish what export options Hireflix provides. We also don’t have Reddit posts or comments in the published material, so we can’t reliably say what users report as reasons for leaving. The clearest potential mismatch in the published product details is workflow: Hireflix is built around recorded, asynchronous screening, so teams requiring live first-round interviews may prefer another setup.