accessiBe review

accessiBe sells automated accessibility remediation, expert services, or a combination of the two. Its automated product scans websites and applies fixes, with updates listed every 24 hours. The company says its tools support screen readers and keyboard navigation, while its services include manual testing of key user flows, custom fixes, and litigation support. It positions the offering around WCAG-based remediation and support for ADA and EAA compliance; that is not the same as a guarantee that a website complies.

The pricing page lists three fixed-price plans and an Enterprise tier with custom pricing. Micro starts at $59 month to month, or $490 per year (about $40.83 monthly), for sites with up to 5,000 monthly visits. Growth is $179 monthly or $1,490 annually for up to 30,000 visits. Scale is $479 monthly or $3,990 annually for up to 100,000 visits. Enterprise is for sites above 100,000 visits, with price not published.

The useful part of accessiBe’s offer is that it is not limited to automated scans and fixes. The pricing page lists manual expert testing, custom remediation, and legal support at higher tiers, giving buyers options beyond the automated product. That matters if a team wants monitoring alongside human review, rather than treating a widget as its whole accessibility program.

The plan differences are concrete:

• Micro includes scans and fixes every 24 hours, an accessibility report and documentation, plus email and live chat support. Its cap is 5,000 visits per month.
• Growth raises the cap to 30,000 visits and adds a dedicated case manager, Google Analytics integration, and user and team management. The page lists support response within two days.
• Scale covers up to 100,000 visits and includes yearly expert testing and validation, custom accessibility fixes, and one hour with a top ADA attorney. It also lists a two-day support response.

Enterprise adds on-demand expert testing, 5–10 hours with a top ADA attorney, single sign-on, solution engineering, and a dedicated account manager with a one-day response. That service mix may suit organizations that need more than automated fixes, though the Enterprise price is not published.

The main trade-off is that automated remediation has limits, and accessiBe’s own pricing makes the traffic ceiling easy to hit. Micro stops at 5,000 visits a month; Growth at 30,000; Scale at 100,000. A site above that needs Enterprise pricing, which is not published. Subdomains require additional plans, and the pricing page does not list their cost. Custom legal terms are listed for yearly Enterprise packages at $20,000 or more.

There is also sustained criticism of accessibility overlays in Reddit discussions. In one r/accessibility thread, commenters advised against using an overlay as a substitute for fixing the site itself; one warned that overlays can introduce bugs if a site’s code is not understood by the script. Another thread included commenters calling automated tools inadequate for fixing underlying code issues. These are user opinions, not an independent assessment of accessiBe, but they point to a real buying risk: the advertised automation should not be mistaken for complete accessibility work. Budget for manual review and code-level remediation where needed, and weigh that cost against the subscription.

The listed monthly rates are $59 for Micro, $179 for Growth and $479 for Scale. Annual billing is $490, $1,490 and $3,990 per year, respectively—about $40.83, $124.17 and $332.50 per month, paid annually. There’s no free plan; trial availability is not published.

The visit caps are the main constraint: Micro covers up to 5,000 visits a month, Growth up to 30,000, and Scale up to 100,000. Moving from Micro to Growth adds $120 a month on monthly billing; Growth to Scale adds another $300. Enterprise is for sites above 100,000 visits, but its price is not published.

Watch the extras: subdomains require additional plans, with no listed price. Yearly Enterprise packages may include custom legal terms at $20,000 or more. Scale lists yearly expert testing, custom fixes and one hour with an ADA attorney; those inclusions aren’t listed for the cheaper tiers. Compare your traffic against the cap before choosing a plan.

The published material doesn’t publish a migration process, implementation time, data-export options or contract terms. Before switching, ask accessiBe what happens to scan reports, documentation and custom fixes if you leave, and whether your team can retain them. Also confirm how a new setup handles subdomains: each requires an additional plan, but the price isn’t listed.

If you’re moving from accessiBe, plan to review the site’s accessibility independently rather than assume its automated fixes transfer or remain in place. The product also offers manual testing and custom fixes, but the sources don’t explain how those are handed off. Our verdict flags criticism of overlays, so teams that don’t want an overlay-based approach should clarify exactly what is installed and what changes on the site.

We can’t responsibly summarize why Reddit users leave: no Reddit posts or comments were included in the published material. Treat migration effort, data portability and reasons for switching as questions to verify with the vendor and current users—not published facts.