We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Both start at $40.83/month on annual billing, but accessiBe also publishes monthly prices: $59 for Micro, versus no published UserWay monthly rate. Choose UserWay for a widget plus page monitoring; Small/Pro monitors up to 10 pages, with higher tiers covering 50 or 100. Choose accessiBe for published visit caps, daily scans, and expert testing or custom fixes on Scale. Neither offers a free plan. A widget is not a substitute for accessible development.
01Side by side
| UserWay | accessiBe | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $40.83/month annually; monthly rate not published | $40.83/month annually; $59 monthly |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Best for | Widget, monitoring, audits, and accessibility services | Visit-capped remediation with expert testing and custom fixes |
| Core strength | Page-load widget; Small/Pro monitors up to 10 pages | Scans and fixes every 24 hours |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations and data | Integrations not listed | Google Analytics on Growth |
| Team controls and seat costs | Team controls and seat costs not published | Team management on Growth; seat costs not published |
| Support | 24/7 chat on Small/Pro | Micro email/live chat; higher-tier response times published |
UserWay Choose UserWay if
- Choose UserWay if you want a widget plus ongoing page monitoring.
- Choose UserWay if 24/7 chat on Small/Pro matters.
- Choose UserWay if your site fits its 100K-view Small/Pro cap.
accessiBe Choose accessiBe if
- Choose accessiBe if you want published monthly billing prices.
- Choose accessiBe if 24-hour scans and fixes fit your needs.
- Choose accessiBe if expert testing and custom fixes matter.
02Pricing compared
Both start at $40.83 per month with annual billing, according to their pricing pages. accessiBe also publishes monthly rates: $59 for Micro, $179 for Growth and $479 for Scale. UserWay does not publish monthly prices; its page says annual plans save 16%. Neither has a free plan, and free-trial terms are not published on the vendor's site.
The caps measure different things, so they are not directly comparable. UserWay’s Small/Pro plan covers up to 100,000 monthly page views and monitors 10 pages. accessiBe’s Micro plan covers up to 5,000 monthly visits and includes scans every 24 hours. At higher tiers, UserWay’s Pro Plus and Ultimate monitor 50 and 100 pages; accessiBe’s Scale covers up to 100,000 visits and includes yearly expert testing and custom fixes. UserWay’s Large pricing is custom.
03Features and depth
UserWay combines an AI-powered widget with source-code monitoring, expert audits and accessibility services. Its widget looks for and fixes common issues with each page load; monitoring scans for WCAG and ADA violations. The Small/Pro plan monitors up to 10 pages, while Pro Plus covers 50 and Ultimate covers 100. Audits and VPAT reports are add-ons, and their prices are not published.
accessiBe focuses on automated scans and fixes, with updates every 24 hours and support for screen readers and keyboard navigation. Its higher tiers add more expert involvement: Scale includes yearly expert testing, custom fixes and one hour with an ADA attorney. Enterprise lists on-demand testing and 5–10 attorney hours, with custom pricing. Both offer litigation support, though the listed terms differ. A widget or automated fix is not a substitute for accessible development; the published reviews also caution against treating overlays as a complete solution.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Both products offer automation intended to reduce the work of finding common accessibility issues. UserWay pairs its widget with monitoring and optional audits, so teams should check whether the page-monitoring cap fits their site and whether they need separate expert services. The published details do not describe setup steps or a learning curve.
accessiBe publishes visit limits and scan frequency, which makes its plan boundaries easier to check before buying. Growth adds team management and a case manager; Scale adds expert testing and custom fixes. Those services may matter to teams that need human review, but they also bring more plan detail to evaluate. Neither product’s published pricing information establishes that using its widget alone makes a site compliant.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, UserWay or accessiBe?
At the starting annual rate, they tie at $40.83 per month. accessiBe publishes monthly billing at $59 for Micro; UserWay does not publish a monthly rate. Compare the limits carefully: UserWay counts page views and monitored pages, while accessiBe’s plans count visits.
How do UserWay and accessiBe measure their plan limits?
UserWay’s plans specify monthly page views and how many pages are monitored. accessiBe specifies monthly website visits. Those are different measures, so the caps cannot be compared one-for-one. Check your site’s relevant traffic measure and monitoring needs against each plan before choosing.
Do UserWay or accessiBe offer a free plan?
Neither product lists a free plan in the published pricing details. Free-trial terms are not published in those details, so we cannot confirm whether either offers a trial. UserWay’s audit and VPAT add-on prices are also not published.
Does an accessibility widget guarantee a compliant website?
No such guarantee is stated in the published product information. UserWay describes its widget as addressing common issues, while both products also offer monitoring or expert services. The published reviews caution that a widget should not replace accessible development, manual review or ongoing remediation.