We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Notion for a shared team workspace that organizes information, answers questions with citations and automates work. Choose Overleaf for scientific or technical documents written collaboratively in LaTeX, with visual and code editors, templates and citation tools. Both have free plans, but their paid prices use different currencies and billing details, so they are not a like-for-like cost comparison. Pick based on the work your team needs to do, not the name of the lowest entry price.
01Side by side
| Notion | Overleaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Plus: €9.50/member/month; billing cadence unstated. | Student: $8.25/month annually, or $13 monthly. |
| Free plan | Free; 5 MB uploads, 7-day history, limited AI. | Free; one collaborator/project, five AI uses/day. |
| Best for | Teams organizing shared information and automating work. | Scientific and technical writing in LaTeX. |
| Core strength | Team information, cited answers and work agents. | Collaborative LaTeX editing, templates and citations. |
| Learning curve | Flexible workspace; flexibility can become extra work. | Visual editing; no prior LaTeX knowledge required. |
| Integrations/data | Team system of record; answers with citations. | Shared documents with citations and bibliographies. |
| Team/seat costs | Prices are per member; billing cadence is unstated. | Organizations plan is for 20+ users; pricing is custom. |
| Support | Review support score: 4; scale not stated. | Review support score: 5; scale not stated. |
Notion Choose Notion if
- Choose Notion if your team needs a shared information hub.
- Choose Notion if cited answers matter across team information.
- Choose Notion if you want agents for reporting or feedback triage.
Overleaf Choose Overleaf if
- Choose Overleaf if your team writes scientific or technical documents.
- Choose Overleaf if you need shared LaTeX editing and comments.
- Choose Overleaf if templates and document bibliography tools matter.
02Pricing compared
Notion’s Free plan is €0, Plus is €9.50 and Business is €19.50 per member per month. The published pricing details do not say whether paid rates require monthly or annual billing. Enterprise pricing is custom. Free limits uploads to 5 MB, page history to 7 days and external guests to 10; Plus raises those caps to 5 GB and 30 days, respectively. Overleaf’s Free plan is $0. Its annual rates are $8.25 for Student, $16.75 for Standard and $33.25 for Pro per month; monthly billing costs $13, $25 and $45. Both offer free plans, but the currencies differ and Notion’s billing basis is unclear, so their entry prices are not a like-for-like comparison. Overleaf Organizations is for 20+ users; its price is not published.
03Features and depth
These tools do different jobs. Notion is a shared workspace for bringing team information into one system of record. It can answer questions with citations, and its homepage presents agents for work such as triaging product feedback, resolving support tickets in Slack and automating weekly reports. Its Free plan includes a limited AI trial; Custom Agents are free to try, then cost $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits. Overleaf is built for collaborative scientific and technical writing in LaTeX. It offers visual and code editors, templates, document comments and simultaneous editing, plus tools for formulas, figures, tables, citations and bibliographies. Free projects allow one collaborator; Student and Standard allow 10, while Pro allows unlimited collaborators. Overleaf also includes learning resources and says users can work without downloads or prior LaTeX knowledge. Choose by document workflow, not by trying to make one a substitute for the other.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Overleaf is the more focused starting point if the job is a LaTeX document: it offers visual editing for people who do not know LaTeX, alongside code editing and learning resources. Its Free plan limits each project to one collaborator, so check that cap before sharing. Notion covers broader team work, from keeping information to automating tasks. That flexibility can mean more decisions about how to organize the workspace; our review describes it as capable when teams can keep that flexibility from becoming extra work. The published material does not establish that either product is easier for every team. A useful test is whether your daily work is mainly maintaining shared team information or producing formatted technical documents.
Questions people ask
Why use Obsidian instead of Notion?
The published material does not compare Obsidian with Notion, so we can’t make a sourced case for switching to Obsidian. It describes Notion as a shared team workspace with information, cited answers and work automation. If those are your priorities, the material supports considering Notion; compare Obsidian’s current features and pricing separately.
Is Notion still relevant in 2026?
The published material positions Notion as a shared system of record for team information, with answers that include citations and agents for tasks such as feedback triage and reporting. That describes its current use case, but the material does not provide market-share or adoption data to measure broader relevance in 2026.
What is the difference between Notion and GitHub?
The published material does not describe GitHub, so it cannot support a full comparison. It describes Notion as a shared workspace for team information, cited answers and work automation. Check GitHub’s own current documentation to compare its features and pricing with the workflow you need.
Are Airtable and Notion similar?
The published material does not detail Airtable, so we can’t verify how closely the products overlap. It describes Notion as a shared team system of record with cited answers and automation. Compare Airtable’s current features and pricing against those needs before treating either product as a replacement.