We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose monday.com if you want a flexible workspace for cross-team workflows, dashboards, docs, forms and AI agents; its pricing lists annual billing from £8 per seat monthly. Choose Teamwork.com if your work centers on client projects, resourcing, time tracking and profitability; annual billing starts at $9.99 per user monthly, with a three-user minimum on Basics. These prices use different currencies, and the products solve different problems, so compare plan limits—not just headline rates.
01Side by side
| monday.com | Teamwork.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | £8/seat/month with annual billing (Basic) | $9.99/user/month with annual billing (Basics) |
| Free plan | Yes; up to 2 seats and 3 boards | Yes; up to 5 users and 5 projects |
| Best for | Cross-team work and customizable workflows | Client projects, resourcing and profitability |
| Core strength | AI workspace, agents and workflow automation | Project costs, margins and resource planning |
| Learning curve | Not published on the vendor's site | Not published on the vendor's site |
| Integrations and data | Standard: 250 integration actions/month; 1,000 API calls/day | Basics: 150 API requests/minute; 100GB storage |
| Team and seat costs | Paid seat minimum not published; billed per seat | Basics minimum 3 users; Accelerate minimum 5 |
| Support | Support details not published on the vendor's site | Support details not published on the vendor's site |
monday.com Choose monday.com if
- Choose monday.com if you need cross-team workflows and dashboards.
- Choose monday.com if AI agents and custom automation matter.
- Choose monday.com if you want a free plan capped at two seats.
Teamwork.com Choose Teamwork.com if
- Choose Teamwork.com if you manage client projects and profitability.
- Choose Teamwork.com if resource planning and time tracking are central.
- Choose Teamwork.com if five free users cover your small team.
02Pricing compared
monday.com’s pricing page lists annual-billing rates from £8 per seat per month for Basic, £11 for Standard and £17 for Pro. Monthly-billed prices aren’t published in the published pricing details. Its free plan allows up to two seats, three boards and three Docs. Standard includes 250 automation actions monthly; Pro includes 25,000.
Teamwork.com’s pricing lists annual rates from $9.99 per user per month for Basics, or $13.99 billed monthly. Basics requires at least three users and caps accounts at 300 projects. Accelerate is $24.99 annually or $29.99 monthly, with a five-user minimum and a 600-project cap. Free covers up to five users and five projects.
These are different currencies, so the headline figures aren’t directly comparable. Compare seat minimums and usage limits alongside price; Optimize and Enterprise pricing is custom.
03Features and depth
The main difference is what each product is built to manage. monday.com describes itself as an AI workspace for work across teams, with boards, dashboards, documents, forms, automations and AI agents. Its agents can handle tasks such as ticket triage, campaign work, recruiting and project risk tracking. Teams can also build agents by setting goals, rules, tools, knowledge and skills. Plan limits matter: Basic includes 1,000 AI credits monthly and three AI tools; Standard has three workflows, while Pro has 20.
Teamwork.com is more specifically aimed at professional services work. Its feature set covers client projects, requests and tickets, resource planning by skill or role, time tracking, and project costs, budgets and margins. Reporting and forecasting use logged work, and its AI agents can draft reports, price work, summarize information and flag risks using delivery data.
If you need a flexible workspace across departments, monday.com’s feature mix fits that brief. If delivery, capacity and profitability on client work are central, Teamwork.com has the more directly aligned tools.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The review scores rate both products 7/10 for ease of use, so we can’t use that rating to call one the easier choice. The published information doesn’t detail onboarding or setup time.
The practical learning curve will depend on what you configure. monday.com offers a broad workspace with dashboards, Docs, forms, automations and custom AI agents; Teamwork.com combines project delivery with resourcing, time tracking and profitability reporting. More specialized workflows may take setup, but the sources don’t quantify that effort.
For a low-commitment start, monday.com’s free plan is limited to two seats. Teamwork.com offers a 14-day trial and a free plan for up to five users, capped at five projects.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, monday.com or Teamwork.com?
The listed annual starting prices are £8 per seat monthly for monday.com Basic and $9.99 per user monthly for Teamwork.com Basics. They use different currencies, so the figures aren’t directly comparable. Teamwork Basics also requires at least three users; monday.com’s free plan supports up to two seats.
Which product is better for client projects?
Teamwork.com is positioned for professional services and includes client project management, resource planning, time tracking, and profitability reporting. monday.com offers project and operations tools for multiple teams, plus dashboards, Docs, forms and AI agents. Choose based on whether client delivery economics or broader workflows are central.
Do monday.com and Teamwork.com have free plans or trials?
Both list a free plan. monday.com’s free tier allows up to two seats, three boards and three Docs. Teamwork.com’s free tier covers up to five users and five projects. Teamwork.com also lists a 14-day trial; a trial period for monday.com isn’t published in the published pricing details.
Which has more useful AI features?
It depends on the work. monday.com lists customizable agents and AI workflows, with plan-specific credit limits and tools. Teamwork.com’s AI agents can draft reports, price work, summarize information and flag risks using live delivery data. The published details don’t establish that one product’s AI performs better.