We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Recruiterflow if a lower listed seat price and ATS/CRM workflows are your priority: its Platform plan is $119 per user/month billed annually or $149 monthly. Choose Loxo if its 850-million-person talent graph, sourcing tools and recruiting agents fit your workflow; Core starts at $149 per user/month on an annual plan paid upfront. Neither has a free plan. Recruiterflow’s AIRA pricing is custom, so compare full costs before switching.
01Side by side
| Loxo | Recruiterflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $149/user/month, annual plan paid upfront | $119 annual; $149 monthly per user |
| Free plan | No; seven-day free trial | No; trial not published |
| Best for | Recruiting firms wanting sourcing and business development | Search firms wanting ATS/CRM and workflow automation |
| Core strength | 850-million-person talent graph and recruiting tools | ATS/CRM, outreach sequences and 36 AI agents |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Sourcing and outreach | 850M+ talent graph; multichannel outreach | Natural-language search; email, LinkedIn and phone sequences |
| Team and seat costs | Free migration for teams with 3+ seats | Data migration is paid; price not published |
| Support | Enterprise includes dedicated success and priority support | Not published |
Loxo Choose Loxo if
- Choose Loxo if its 850M+ talent graph suits your sourcing.
- Choose Loxo if you want ATS and recruiting CRM together.
- Choose Loxo if your team has 3+ seats and values free migration.
Recruiterflow Choose Recruiterflow if
- Choose Recruiterflow if the lower annual Platform price matters.
- Choose Recruiterflow if you need outreach across email, LinkedIn and phone.
- Choose Recruiterflow if you want its listed 36 AI agents.
02Pricing compared
Recruiterflow has the lower listed annual seat price: its Platform plan is $119 per user/month when billed annually, or $149 monthly. Loxo Core is $149 per user/month on an annual plan paid upfront. Loxo lists Professional and Enterprise pricing as custom, while Recruiterflow’s AIRA pricing is also custom, so the headline prices do not settle the cost of AI and sourcing features.
Loxo Professional includes 2,500 credits per seat each month; prices for extra credit capacity are not published. Recruiterflow lists paid data migration, but not its price. Neither product has a free plan. Loxo lists a seven-day free trial; a Recruiterflow trial is not published. Compare the plan that covers your actual workflows, not just the entry-level seat price.
03Features and depth
Both products combine recruiting workflows with ATS and CRM features, outreach and automation. Loxo’s distinguishing feature is its talent graph: the company says it contains 850 million people, and its Professional plan includes Loxo Source searches. Loxo also lists AI search in Core and agent features for sourcing, contact finding, candidate summaries and interview notes. Professional includes 2,500 credits per seat per month and three Data Agents under every record.
Recruiterflow emphasizes natural-language AIRA Search, outreach sequences across email, LinkedIn and phone, workflow automation, reporting and goals. Its homepage says 36 agents are built into the product; AIRA pricing is custom, and the plan includes current and future AIRA agents at no extra cost. Its Platform plan lists unlimited jobs, candidates, contacts and companies. Before switching, confirm which features sit in the quoted plan and test search against your own candidate data. The published descriptions do not establish which database will return better-fit candidates.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The available product information does not establish which platform is easier to learn. Both combine several recruiting functions, so the practical question is whether your team wants sourcing, CRM, outreach and automation in one workflow—or can adopt those features without adding unnecessary process.
Migration terms are clearer than onboarding details: Loxo lists free migration for teams with three or more seats, while Recruiterflow says migration is paid and does not publish the price. Ask both vendors how they handle your existing records, fields and activity history, and get migration costs in writing. Also confirm whether the people who need sourcing or AI features will require a custom-priced plan.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, Loxo or Recruiterflow?
Recruiterflow lists Platform at $119 per user/month billed annually, compared with Loxo Core at $149 per user/month on an annual plan paid upfront. Recruiterflow’s monthly Platform price is $149. Custom pricing for Loxo Professional and Recruiterflow AIRA can change the total cost.
Do Loxo or Recruiterflow offer a free plan or trial?
Neither product lists a free plan. Loxo lists a seven-day free trial. Recruiterflow’s trial availability is not published in the published pricing information, so ask the vendor directly rather than assuming the same terms.
Is AI included in Loxo and Recruiterflow?
Loxo lists AI search in Core, while Professional includes 2,500 monthly credits per seat and agent features. Recruiterflow says its AIRA plan includes current and future agents at no extra cost, but AIRA pricing is custom. Confirm which AI features are included in your quote.
What should we check before migrating from one to the other?
Ask for a migration scope and written cost. Loxo lists free migration for teams of three or more seats; Recruiterflow lists paid migration, with the price not published. Confirm how candidate records, custom fields and activity history will transfer, then validate search on your migrated data.