search legion

Head-to-head · CRM software

Close vs Salesloft

Close has published per-seat plans and built-in sales tools. Salesloft focuses on revenue signals and AI-prioritized actions, with pricing by quote.

Close

7.0/10
VS

Salesloft

4.2/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Close.

Choose Close if you want a sales CRM with built-in calling, email, SMS, pipeline tools and automation, and you need published per-seat pricing: plans start at $9/user/month billed annually ($19 monthly). Choose Salesloft if your priority is revenue signals, AI-prioritized actions, forecasting and deal-risk plays across your stack. Its pricing is not published, so get a quote before comparing total cost. Close is the clearer shortlist; Salesloft's feature fit depends on your sales process and budget.

01Side by side

CloseSalesloft
Starting priceFrom $9/user/month annually; $19 monthlyNot published; quote required
Free planNoNo
Best forTeams wanting a sales CRM with built-in communicationTeams prioritizing revenue signals and AI-guided actions
Core strengthCRM with calling, email, SMS, workflows, and Chloe AIRevenue signals, forecast summaries, and deal-risk plays
Learning curveEase-of-use review score: 7Ease-of-use review score: 5
Integrations and data3–10 connected email accounts, depending on planCaptures revenue signals across your stack
Team and seat costsEssentials $35; Growth $99/user/month annuallyCustom quote; rates not published
SupportReview support score: 5Review support score: 3

Choose Close if

  • Choose Close if you want published per-seat pricing.
  • Choose Close if built-in calling, email, and SMS matter.
  • Choose Close if you need workflows on Growth or above.

Choose Salesloft if

  • Choose Salesloft if revenue signals across your stack are central.
  • Choose Salesloft if AI forecast summaries fit your process.
  • Choose Salesloft if deal-risk plays are a priority.

02Pricing compared

Close lists Solo at $19 per user/month when billed monthly or $9 when billed annually. Essentials is $49 monthly or $35 annually; Growth is $109 or $99; Scale is $149 or $139. Solo and Essentials do not include workflows, so teams needing automation start at Growth. Annual rates are lower, with the pricing page listing savings of up to 50%.

Salesloft does not publish monthly or annual prices; it directs buyers to request a custom quote. That makes a direct cost comparison impossible without a sales conversation. Close also has usage costs: calling and SMS are passed through at cost, phone lines start at $1 per line/month, and Call Assistant costs $50 per organization/month plus $0.02 per minute. Get a Salesloft quote and estimate Close usage before comparing total costs.

03Features and depth

Close is the more directly defined sales CRM. It combines calling, email, SMS, pipeline management, reporting, and automation. Its AI sales agent, Chloe, can call and qualify leads, book meetings, and update CRM records. AI notes capture call and meeting details, while the assistant can answer questions about pipeline activity, meetings, and calls and draft follow-ups. Workflows are included on Growth and Scale, not Solo or Essentials.

Salesloft is positioned around revenue signals across a company’s stack rather than as a CRM with published channel and pipeline details. Its listed capabilities include AI-prioritized next steps, forecast summaries comparing human and AI projections, deal-risk plays, meeting preparation, and agent queries via MCP. The distinction is practical: Close spells out daily sales channels and CRM tasks; Salesloft emphasizes interpreting signals and coordinating revenue actions. Its public feature description does not establish whether it replaces a CRM or how its tools fit a particular stack.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Close has a more concrete starting point: its Solo plan is aimed at one user, while Essentials is for small teams. But the low entry price does not include workflows, and AI credits, call recording retention, connected email accounts, and usage charges vary by plan. Teams should check those limits against their process before moving.

Salesloft’s stack-wide signal and forecasting focus may make fit depend more on how a team handles revenue data and actions. Its pricing and plan limits are not published, so buyers need a sales conversation to assess both cost and scope. Our review scores put Close at 7/10 for ease of use and Salesloft at 5/10; those scores are directional, not a substitute for checking workflow fit.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, Close or Salesloft?

Close is the only one with published per-user rates: $9 per user/month billed annually for Solo, or $19 billed monthly. Salesloft pricing is not published, so we cannot say which costs less overall. Include Close’s calling, SMS, and optional add-on charges when estimating its total.

Does Close include sales automation on every plan?

No. The pricing details list workflows as not included on Solo or Essentials. Automated workflows are included on Growth and Scale. If automation is essential, compare those plans with a Salesloft quote rather than treating Close’s $9 annual Solo rate as the relevant price.

What is the main difference between Close and Salesloft?

Close brings calling, email, SMS, pipeline management, and CRM records together, with AI and automation features. Salesloft focuses on capturing revenue signals across a company’s stack and turning them into prioritized actions, including forecasts and deal-risk plays.

Can we compare Salesloft’s price with Close’s annual plan?

Not from public pricing alone. Salesloft does not list monthly or annual rates and directs buyers to request a quote. Ask for the quote and plan limits, then compare them with Close’s annual per-user price plus expected calling, SMS, and add-on costs.