We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Asana for general work management: its plans connect tasks, projects, goals, and dependencies, and its Personal plan supports two users with unlimited tasks and projects. Choose Teamwork.com for client services work where time, costs, margins, and resourcing matter. Its annual-billing entry plan is $9.99 per user monthly, versus Asana’s $10.99, but Teamwork.com Basics requires at least three users and caps projects at 300. Both offer free plans, with different limits.
01Side by side
| Asana | Teamwork.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $10.99/user monthly, billed annually | $9.99/user monthly, billed annually |
| Free plan | Two users; unlimited tasks and projects | Up to five users and five projects |
| Best for | Teams coordinating general work and goals | Client services teams tracking project profitability |
| Core strength | Connects tasks, projects, goals, and dependencies | Tracks client-project costs, margins, and resources |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations and governance | 100+ free integrations; enterprise governance features | Integration count not published; API limits listed |
| Team and seat costs | Starter has no user seat limits | Basics requires three; Accelerate requires five |
| Support | Review support score: 5 | Review support score: 6 |
Asana Choose Asana if
- Choose Asana if you need shared plans, tasks, goals, and dependencies.
- Choose Asana if a two-user free plan fits your team.
- Choose Asana if you want 100+ free integrations listed.
Teamwork.com Choose Teamwork.com if
- Choose Teamwork.com if you manage client projects and profitability.
- Choose Teamwork.com if you need time tracking and resource planning.
- Choose Teamwork.com if its three-seat Basics minimum works for you.
02Pricing compared
On annual billing, Asana Starter is $10.99 per user/month; Teamwork.com Basics is $9.99. Teamwork.com is $1 cheaper per seat, but Basics requires at least three users, putting the minimum at $29.97 per month when billed annually. Asana Starter lists no seat minimum. Monthly billing raises Starter to $13.49 and Basics to $13.99 per user/month.
Asana Personal is free for two users, with unlimited tasks and projects, but limits files to 100MB each. Teamwork.com Free supports up to five users and five projects, with 100MB of file storage and 100 automations per month. Paid caps matter: Basics allows up to 300 projects; Accelerate requires five users and allows 600. Asana Advanced costs $24.99 per user/month annually. Higher tiers on both products require custom pricing. Teamwork.com offers a 14-day trial; Asana trial terms are not published here.
03Features and depth
Asana is the broader work-management choice. Its Work Graph connects people, tasks, projects, goals, and dependencies, and its plans cover project planning and workflow management. Starter includes unlimited automations and 75,000 AI Studio credits per billing account monthly; Advanced adds goals, resource management, unlimited portfolios, and 200,000 credits. Enterprise tiers add governance and security features such as SAML, SCIM, audit logs, and data residency, depending on the plan.
Teamwork.com is more specifically built around professional services work. It combines client projects and tickets with time tracking, resource planning, cost and margin tracking, reporting, and forecasting. Its AI agents can draft reports, price work, summarize information, and flag risks using delivery data. Higher paid plans have published project, automation, storage, and API limits; custom tiers list higher allowances or unlimited projects.
For general team planning, Asana has the wider stated scope. For agencies and other client-service teams that need to connect tracked hours to project costs and profitability, Teamwork.com has the more direct fit.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The published reviews score ease of use at 7/10 for Asana and 7/10 for Teamwork.com, so they do not establish a clear winner. The more useful distinction is what each team needs to manage: Asana brings tasks, goals, dependencies, and workflows together, while Teamwork.com adds client delivery, time, resourcing, and profitability tracking.
Those extra capabilities may mean more setup for a team that only needs task tracking; that is a fit consideration, not a measured learning-curve result. Teamwork.com’s minimum seats and project caps also require planning as a team grows. Asana’s free plan is limited to two users, while Teamwork.com’s free plan allows up to five users but only five projects.
Questions people ask
Is Teamwork.com cheaper than Asana?
At annual-billing list prices, Teamwork.com Basics is $9.99 per user/month versus $10.99 for Asana Starter. But Basics requires at least three users, so the minimum annual-billed monthly total is $29.97. Asana Starter lists no seat minimum. Monthly-billing prices are $13.99 and $13.49, respectively.
Which is better for an agency or client-services team?
Teamwork.com is the more direct fit if you need client project management alongside time tracking, resource planning, project costs, and margins. Its features are built around professional services work. Asana can manage projects and workflows, but the published details do not list the same specific profitability and time-tracking focus.
Does Asana or Teamwork.com have a free plan?
Both offer a free plan. Asana Personal supports two users and unlimited tasks and projects, with 100MB per file. Teamwork.com Free supports up to five users and five projects, with 100MB of storage and 100 automations per month. The limits differ, so compare them with your team size and project count.
Which product tracks project time and profitability?
Teamwork.com lists time tracking and tools to monitor project costs, budgets, and margins, along with reporting and forecasting from logged work. The published Asana feature details focus on work management, planning, goals, and dependencies; they do not list time tracking or project profitability features.