We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Zinc is positioned for employers screening across countries, standardizing checks by role, or paying per check at lower hiring volumes. Its summary also flags opaque pricing, and the Reddit threads we read discuss zinc supplements—not hiring software—so they offer no relevant buyer feedback. Checkr is the closest screening-focused alternative here. The rest cover adjacent needs such as recruiting automation, assessments, or ATS and CRM workflows; they are not confirmed like-for-like replacements for Zinc’s global screening coverage.
01Why people leave Zinc
Pricing is hard to compare
Zinc’s listed starting price is n/a, and its summary calls pricing opaque. If you need to estimate screening spend before talking to sales, that makes comparison harder.
No relevant user feedback
The Reddit threads we read are about mineral supplements, not hiring software. They do not help assess Zinc’s screening, support, accuracy, or value.
Your hiring stack may have widened
Zinc is described around global screening. If you now need ATS/CRM, assessments, or recruiting automation, compare those categories separately rather than assuming they replace screening.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Screening checks
CheckrCheckrIf you want another screening-focused option, Checkr is the closest match in this list: its summary describes a wide menu of check types, with a listed starting price of $24.99 and a free plan. That gives you a public figure to compare with Zinc’s unpublished price. The published information does not confirm that Checkr matches Zinc’s global coverage.
Trade-off: The summary flags reported accuracy issues and does not establish comparable global coverage.
5.7/10from
$24.99/mofree plan - Assessments and interviews
CriteriaCriteriaCriteria is worth comparing if your hiring process needs assessments and interviews alongside hiring and employee-development tools. That is a broader evaluation workflow than the screening-focused Zinc description. Criteria’s pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so request a quote and confirm whether it covers your screening requirements before treating it as a replacement.
Trade-off: Custom-quote pricing; the published summary does not establish screening coverage.
5.4/10from
Custom - Technical screening
HackerRankHackerRankHackerRank fits teams assessing AI fluency, running pair-programming interviews, or adding structured technical screening. It may suit a hiring process where technical evaluation is the gap, but the published information does not position it as a replacement for global background screening. Its listed starting price is $165, with a free plan, and pricing is shaped around attempt caps.
Trade-off: Technical hiring focus, attempt caps, and mixed candidate feedback.
5.9/10from
$165/mofree plan - Hiring automation
ParadoxParadoxParadox is a candidate to compare if your priority has shifted from checks to automating hiring tasks across multiple stages. The published summary says it can work alongside an existing system of record, which may suit teams not looking to replace their core system. Its price and limits are not published on the vendor's site.
Trade-off: Unpublished pricing and limits; not a confirmed screening substitute.
6.2/10from
Custom - ATS and recruiting CRM
CATSCATSCATS makes more sense if you want an ATS and recruiting CRM together, plus candidate-stage workflows and client/applicant tracking. That is a broader recruiting operations choice than Zinc’s screening focus. Its listed starting price is $95, giving you a figure to investigate, but the published information does not say it provides Zinc-style global checks.
Trade-off: Per-user pricing, and comparable global screening is not established.
6.5/10from
$95/mo - Staffing operations
BullhornBullhornBullhorn is the strongest fit here for staffing firms consolidating ATS and CRM workflows, with automation and back-office tools also in scope. It is a broader operational move, not a confirmed replacement for Zinc’s global screening. The listed starting price is $99; the summary advises getting a quote for AI or front-to-back operations.
Trade-off: Get a quote for AI or front-to-back operations; screening equivalence is unconfirmed.
7.2/10from
$99/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc Zinc (current) | 6.8 | Custom | No | Employers hiring across multiple countries |
| Checkr Checkr | 5.7 | $24.99/mo | Yes | Landlords screening tenants |
| Criteria Criteria | 5.4 | Custom | No | Teams combining assessments and interviews |
| HackerRank HackerRank | 5.9 | $165/mo | Yes | Teams assessing AI fluency |
| Paradox Paradox | 6.2 | Custom | No | Organizations automating hiring tasks |
| CATS CATS | 6.5 | $95/mo | No | Recruiters needing ATS and CRM together |
| Bullhorn Bullhorn | 7.2 | $99/mo | No | Staffing firms consolidating ATS and CRM |
Questions people ask
Is Zinc a background-check tool?
The published summary describes Zinc as a screening product for employers hiring across multiple countries and standardizing screening by role. It does not spell out individual check types or confirm specific background-check coverage, so ask Zinc for the checks and countries you need before comparing vendors.
Which Zinc alternative is closest for screening?
Checkr is the closest match among these picks because its summary describes a wide screening menu and multiple check types. The published information does not confirm that Checkr matches Zinc’s global coverage. Compare supported countries, checks, and per-check costs directly before switching.
Does Zinc publish its pricing?
The published Zinc summary lists its starting price as n/a and describes its pricing as opaque. It does not provide a plan price or screening rate. Ask Zinc for a quote based on your countries, check types, and hiring volume, then compare that with vendors that list starting prices.