We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Vena is aimed at finance teams that plan in Excel, need governed workflows, or want to connect planning and close. Its listed starting price is unavailable, and the Reddit discussion we read does not provide usable evidence of recurring Vena Solutions complaints. The alternatives below are not all like-for-like replacements: some focus on small-business forecasting or cash flow, while others cover broader planning workflows. Check the plan limits and quote details against your own requirements before switching.
01Why people leave Vena
Price is hard to compare
Vena is listed at “from n/a,” so buyers cannot compare a public starting price against alternatives before contacting sales.
Little usable buyer feedback
The published Reddit results do not establish recurring Vena Solutions complaints: most concern unrelated CBD products, and the FP&A thread is a question.
A narrower workflow may fit
Vena's stated strengths span Excel-centered FP&A, governed workflows, and planning through close; cash-flow or small-business forecasting needs may call for a narrower tool.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Small-business forecasting
PlanGuruPlanGuruIf Vena's broader Excel-centered setup is more than a small business needs, PlanGuru is aimed at detailed forecasts, multiple financial scenarios, and advisors handling several client companies. Its listed entry price is $83 on annual billing, making it a more price-visible option; the entry plan covers one user and one entity.
Trade-off: The entry plan is limited to one user and one entity.
7.0/10from
$83/mo - Multi-year scenario planning
JiravJiravJirav is a closer alternative for teams that want multi-year forecasts and multiple scenarios, with planning and reporting in one platform. Its listed starting price is $50, compared with Vena's unpublished price. That makes initial comparison easier, but the summary flags setup effort and plan caps; check the exact caps before moving models.
Trade-off: Setup effort and plan caps need checking.
6.7/10from
$50/mo - Budget-owner submissions
MartusMartusMartus is worth comparing if the main job is collecting budget-owner submissions, planning personnel costs, or tracking nonprofit grants and funds. Its listed starting price is $554.17, and the product is described as offering budgeting and reporting. That gives buyers a visible price point, though the public pricing information is limited.
Trade-off: Substantial starting price; public pricing is limited.
6.8/10from
$554.17/mo - Planning through close
ProphixProphixProphix is a fit to investigate if you want planning through close and have mid-market or multi-GAAP requirements. Those needs overlap with Vena's stated breadth, so this is a workflow comparison rather than an obvious downgrade in scope. Prophix pricing is not published, so ask for a quote and clarify customization before treating it as a cost-saving switch.
Trade-off: Quote-only pricing and customization questions remain.
6.5/10from
Custom - Shared planning workflows
AbacumAbacumAbacum is aimed at teams replacing spreadsheet-based planning and needing shared workflows, with AI-assisted models and reports listed among its strengths. It may suit a team seeking a different planning setup from Vena's Excel-centered approach. Pricing is not published, however, so buyers cannot judge value from a public starting price before a sales conversation.
Trade-off: Pricing is unpublished, making value hard to judge.
6.8/10from
Custom - Cash-flow scenario modeling
DryrunDryrunDryrun is a narrower option if the reason for leaving Vena is a focus on cash-flow scenarios rather than broad FP&A. It is positioned for businesses replacing cash-flow spreadsheets and fractional CFOs managing multiple clients. The listed starting price is $249, but the annual commitment and one-entity limit are important constraints to check.
Trade-off: Annual commitment and one-entity limit.
6.5/10from
$249/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Vena Vena (current) | 7.0 | Custom | No | Finance teams planning in Excel |
| PlanGuru PlanGuru | 7.0 | $83/mo | No | Small businesses building detailed forecasts |
| Jirav Jirav | 6.7 | $50/mo | No | Firms building an FP&A advisory practice |
| Martus Martus | 6.8 | $554.17/mo | No | Teams consolidating budget-owner submissions |
| Prophix Prophix | 6.5 | Custom | No | Mid-market finance teams consolidating workflows |
| Abacum Abacum | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams replacing spreadsheet-based planning |
| Dryrun Dryrun | 6.5 | $249/mo | No | Businesses modeling cash-flow scenarios |
Questions people ask
Which Vena alternative is closest for broad FP&A?
Prophix is the closest match in this list by stated scope: it covers planning through close and is aimed at mid-market finance teams, including those with multi-GAAP requirements. Its pricing is not published, and customization questions warrant diligence. Abacum also targets spreadsheet-based planning and shared workflows, but its price is unpublished too.
Which Vena alternative has the lowest listed starting price?
Jirav has the lowest listed starting price among these picks at $50. PlanGuru starts at $83 with annual billing, while the other listed starting prices are higher or unavailable. A starting price is not a full quote: check the plan caps and the features included before comparing total costs.
Does Reddit show why Vena Solutions customers are leaving?
Not in the published material. Most of the provided Reddit results discuss unrelated Vena CBD products, while the Vena Solutions FP&A post is a question about an upcoming implementation. We would not treat that material as evidence of recurring product complaints or as a reliable account of why customers switch.