We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Semgrep’s listing starts at $15 and includes a free plan. It suits teams that want code-focused SAST and control over custom rules. The case for leaving is usually coverage: one Reddit commenter says Semgrep’s SCA felt shallow and it had no DAST, so their team added separate tools and had to deduplicate findings. The alternatives below cover different gaps, but not all are like-for-like replacements. Check whether you need broader AppSec coverage, live-app testing or a focused security tool.
01Why people leave Semgrep
You need DAST in the same platform
A Reddit commenter who moved after a quarter says Semgrep had no DAST, so their team added separate dependency and live-app scanners and had to deduplicate findings.
Community rules feel noisy
One commenter says Semgrep’s community ruleset was noisy on AI-generated code, making the findings workload part of the switching decision.
Finding ownership is unclear
A Reddit commenter warns that after two or three months, the harder question may be who triages and fixes findings—not which scanner produced them.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broader AppSec coverage
InvictiInvictiConsider Invicti if Semgrep’s code focus leaves you maintaining separate tools for code and live apps. Its listing positions it for teams scanning code and live apps and consolidating AppSec tools, with enterprise deployment options. That makes it a closer fit for a broader platform search, but pricing is not published and the listing flags reported API shortcomings.
Trade-off: Pricing is opaque, and reported API shortcomings are a reason to check fit before committing.
6.8/10from
Custom - Code and dependencies
SnykSnykSnyk is worth comparing if you want a broader security product for code and dependencies or are adopting AI development tools. Its listing starts at $25 and includes a free plan. But the same listing flags scan noise and opaque Enterprise costs, so a switch may trade Semgrep’s rule control for a findings and pricing question of its own.
Trade-off: The listing flags scan noise and unpublished Enterprise costs.
6.2/10from
$25/mofree plan - Manual web testing
Burp SuiteBurp SuiteBurp Suite fits teams whose immediate gap is hands-on web security testing, not a replacement for Semgrep’s code scanning. Its listing recommends starting with Community and paying for Professional only if its limits become a problem; Professional is listed at $499 a year. The listing also points learners to Web Security Academy labs.
Trade-off: It is aimed at manual web testing, not a broad code-scanning replacement.
7.2/10from
$41.58/mofree plan - Governance and compliance
VeracodeVeracodeVeracode may suit teams leaving Semgrep for broad SDLC security coverage, especially buyers who need governance and compliance features or are securing AI-generated code. The listing describes broad coverage but does not publish a starting price. It also flags user reports worth checking, so ask for details and validate fit before treating it as a safer bet.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and the listing flags user reports to investigate.
4.8/10from
Custom - Firmware security
Finite StateFinite StateFinite State is a specialized option if Semgrep is the wrong fit because your product-security work centers on connected devices. Its listing focuses on firmware and binary analysis and mapping security to regulations. It is not presented as a general code-scanning replacement, so compare it only if that narrower product-security job matches your needs.
Trade-off: It is focused on connected devices, and pricing requires a detailed quote.
6.2/10from
Custom - Secrets and identities
GitGuardianGitGuardianGitGuardian is a focused option if you are looking beyond Semgrep for secrets monitoring. Its listing covers developer and repository scanning, machine-identity governance and a free tier. It is not described as a replacement for code-focused SAST, so treat it as a targeted tool for a secrets gap rather than a one-for-one scanner swap.
Trade-off: Paid-plan rates are not published; it is not a like-for-like SAST replacement.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan - Open-source secret scanning
TruffleHogTruffleHogTruffleHog fits teams that want open-source secret scanning and verification of leaked secrets. Its listing also highlights tracking remediation, which makes it a focused option when secret exposure is the problem you are trying to address. It does not replace Semgrep’s code-focused SAST; compare it as a specialized tool, with paid pricing and limits still unclear.
Trade-off: Paid pricing and limits are not published; it is a specialized secrets tool.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Semgrep Semgrep (current) | 7.6 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams prioritizing code-focused SAST |
| Invicti Invicti | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating AppSec tools |
| Snyk Snyk | 6.2 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams securing code and dependencies |
| Burp Suite Burp Suite | 7.2 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Manual web security testing |
| Veracode Veracode | 4.8 | Custom | No | Teams seeking broad SDLC security coverage |
| Finite State Finite State | 6.2 | Custom | No | Connected-device product security teams |
| GitGuardian GitGuardian | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Small teams starting secrets monitoring |
| TruffleHog TruffleHog | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source secret scanning |
Questions people ask
Which Semgrep alternative should I choose if I need DAST?
Invicti is listed for teams scanning code and live apps and consolidating AppSec tools. Burp Suite is positioned for manual web security testing, not as a full code-scanning replacement. The right comparison depends on whether you want a broader platform or a focused web-testing tool; verify the coverage you need before switching.
How much does Semgrep cost compared with these alternatives?
Semgrep is listed from $15 with a free plan. Snyk starts at $25 with a free plan, while Burp Suite is listed from $41.58 with a free plan and Professional at $499 a year. Pricing is not published for Invicti, Veracode, Finite State or GitGuardian; TruffleHog’s paid pricing is also not published.
Is a secrets scanner a direct Semgrep replacement?
Not based on these listings. Semgrep is positioned for code-focused SAST and custom rules, while GitGuardian and TruffleHog are presented as secrets tools. They may fit a specific secrets-scanning need, but the published information does not describe either as a substitute for Semgrep’s code scanning.