search legion

Head-to-head · App security

Semgrep vs Snyk

Semgrep emphasizes code scanning and rule control; Snyk covers code, agents, and AI apps. Their paid plans use different pricing units.

Semgrep

7.6/10
VS

Snyk

6.2/10

We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money

Short answer

Most buyers should pick Semgrep.

Choose Semgrep for code scanning and rule control: its Free Edition covers up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories, while Teams starts at $30 per contributor monthly. Choose Snyk if you want security coverage for code, development agents, and AI apps, plus IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations. Snyk Team is $25 monthly for up to 10 developers. Both have free plans; Enterprise pricing is custom or credit-based, so compare expected usage before switching.

01Side by side

SemgrepSnyk
Starting price$15 Secrets add-on; Teams starts at $30/contributor/month$25/month for Team, up to 10 developers
Free plan10 contributors, 10 repositories, 60 AI credits5 projects, with monthly Code and Open Source test limits
Best forCode scanning and rule controlSecurity across code, agents, and AI apps
Core strengthSAST, dependency security, and secrets scanningAI code, agent, and application security
Learning curveNot publishedNot published
Integrations/dataIDE and pull-request fixesIDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations
Team/seat costs$30 per contributor/month for Teams$25/month for up to 10 developers
SupportDedicated account manager on EnterpriseNext-business-day support on Team

Choose Semgrep if

  • Choose Semgrep if code scanning and rule control are your priority.
  • Choose Semgrep if its 10-contributor, 10-repository free plan fits.
  • Choose Semgrep if you want a dedicated account manager on Enterprise.

Choose Snyk if

  • Choose Snyk if you need security coverage for development agents and AI apps.
  • Choose Snyk if you want IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations.
  • Choose Snyk if its $25 monthly Team plan suits up to 10 developers.

02Pricing compared

Both products have a free plan, but the caps and paid-plan units differ. Semgrep Free Edition covers up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories, with 60 AI credits. Teams starts at $30 per contributor per month and includes up to 500 private repositories, 20 AI credits per developer per month, and OIDC and SAML SSO. Semgrep’s annual prices are not published; Code, Supply Chain, and Secrets are listed as separate add-ons at $30, $30, and $15 per contributor per month, respectively.

Snyk Free includes 5 projects, 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests monthly, and IaC and Container tests. Team costs $25 monthly for up to 10 developers, with 100 projects and 1,000 Code tests monthly. Enterprise is custom and credit-based: credits cost $1 each, are prepaid, and usage beyond them is invoiced in arrears. Compare expected scans and contributors before switching.

03Features and depth

Semgrep’s listed coverage combines static analysis, dependency security, malware protection, and secrets scanning. It uses rules and AI to detect issues, and its finding triage considers code context, patterns, and prior decisions. It also offers tailored fixes and upgrade guidance in pull requests and IDEs. That makes it the clearer fit when rule control and code scanning are the priority. Its review assessment says to look elsewhere if you need DAST in one platform.

Snyk covers code and open-source dependencies, as well as infrastructure-as-code and container tests in its free-plan limits. Its broader positioning adds security for development agents and AI applications, with continuous offensive security described as part of the platform. Snyk also lists IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations, plus vulnerability remediation. The feature choice is less about a simple SAST-versus-SAST split: Semgrep emphasizes code analysis and rules, while Snyk describes a wider set of AI development security capabilities. Check which capabilities and test volumes your team actually needs before paying for that breadth.

04Ease of use and learning curve

Neither price page settles which product will be easier to roll out; the practical differences are in limits, integrations, and how you manage findings. Semgrep’s paid Teams plan includes OIDC and SAML SSO, while its listed remediation guidance can appear in pull requests and IDEs. Snyk lists integrations for IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and AI coding assistants, and Team includes Jira integration and next-business-day support.

Snyk’s review assessment flags scan noise as a concern, while its Enterprise credit model adds usage tracking to procurement. Semgrep’s separate add-on pricing also needs a close read. Map the products to your repositories, contributor count, and required integrations before switching.

Questions people ask

Is Semgrep any good?

Semgrep is a reasonable fit if your priority is code scanning and rule control. Its Free Edition supports up to 10 contributors and 10 repositories, and paid Teams adds SSO and a higher repository cap. Its review assessment is less favorable if you need DAST in the same platform.

Who are Snyk's main competitors?

In this comparison, Semgrep is the direct alternative to Snyk for code security. The published information does not establish a broader competitor ranking. Compare the two by scope: Semgrep emphasizes code scanning and rules; Snyk also describes security for development agents and AI applications.

Is Semgrep completely free?

No. Semgrep has a Free Edition with limits of 10 contributors, 10 repositories, and 60 AI credits. Teams starts at $30 per contributor per month, and Enterprise pricing is custom. Code, Supply Chain, and Secrets are also listed as paid add-ons.

What are some alternatives to Semgrep?

Snyk is one alternative covered here. It offers a free plan and describes coverage for code, development agents, and AI applications, with IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations. Its Team plan is $25 monthly for up to 10 developers; Enterprise pricing is credit-based and custom.