We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Prophix covers planning through close, but its pricing is quote-only, and one Reddit thread raised questions about implementation, support and making custom changes without outside help. We’d compare alternatives by the work your team actually needs to do: detailed forecasting, cash-flow scenarios, Excel-based planning or budget-owner submissions. The six options below have different strengths and costs, so treat listed starting prices as a first filter—not a like-for-like Prophix quote.
01Why people leave Prophix
Customization may need outside help
A prospective buyer asked whether teams can change calculations themselves. One commenter wanted confidence they could update models without third-party professional services.
Quote-only pricing complicates comparison
Prophix pricing is not published here. In one Reddit thread, a buyer said another vendor came in much lower after negotiating.
Implementation and support need scrutiny
A prospective buyer asked about implementation and customer support when problems occur. The thread does not provide enough feedback to settle either question.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Detailed forecasting
PlanGuruPlanGuruPlanGuru is a fit if your main reason for leaving Prophix is to focus on forecasts and scenario modeling rather than a planning-through-close package. It is aimed at small businesses, teams modeling multiple financial scenarios and advisors managing several client companies. The listed entry price is $83, billed annually, but that plan is limited to one user and one entity.
Trade-off: The entry plan’s one-user, one-entity limits can constrain a growing team.
7.0/10from
$83/mo - Cash-flow scenarios
DryrunDryrunDryrun is the more focused option if your team primarily needs cash-flow scenario modeling or wants to replace cash-flow spreadsheets. It also targets fractional CFOs managing multiple clients. The listed starting price is $249, but the annual commitment and one-entity limit are important constraints to check before switching.
Trade-off: Annual commitment and one-entity limit; it is focused on cash flow.
6.5/10from
$249/mo - Excel-centered planning
VenaVenaVena suits finance teams that want to keep planning in Excel while adding governed workflows, or that need to bring planning and close together. That makes it a closer functional comparison for teams considering Prophix across multiple finance workflows. Pricing is not published here, so request a quote and compare it with Prophix before treating it as a cheaper option.
Trade-off: Pricing is opaque, and public user feedback is thin.
7.0/10from
Custom - Budget-owner submissions
MartusMartusMartus is worth considering if the pain is collecting budget-owner submissions, planning personnel costs, or tracking nonprofit grants and funds. Those needs are more specific than Prophix’s planning-through-close positioning. The listed starting price is $554.17, a substantial entry point; verify what the quoted package includes because public pricing is limited.
Trade-off: The listed starting price is substantial, and public pricing is limited.
6.8/10from
$554.17/mo - Multi-year forecasting
JiravJiravJirav fits teams that need multi-year forecasts, scenario modeling and planning and reporting in one platform. It is also positioned for firms building an FP&A advisory practice. The listed starting price is $50, but setup effort and plan caps deserve scrutiny; confirm the relevant limits and implementation requirements before comparing total cost with Prophix.
Trade-off: Setup effort and plan caps need checking before you commit.
6.7/10from
$50/mo - Shared planning workflows
AbacumAbacumAbacum is a candidate if you are replacing spreadsheet-based planning and need shared finance workflows, with AI-assisted models and reports also part of its stated positioning. That makes it relevant for teams looking to change how planning work is shared. Pricing is not published here, so its value against Prophix is hard to judge before a sales conversation.
Trade-off: No listed price makes an early cost comparison difficult.
6.8/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Prophix Prophix (current) | 6.5 | Custom | No | Mid-market finance teams consolidating workflows |
| PlanGuru PlanGuru | 7.0 | $83/mo | No | Small businesses building detailed forecasts |
| Dryrun Dryrun | 6.5 | $249/mo | No | Businesses modeling cash-flow scenarios |
| Vena Vena | 7.0 | Custom | No | Finance teams planning in Excel |
| Martus Martus | 6.8 | $554.17/mo | No | Teams consolidating budget-owner submissions |
| Jirav Jirav | 6.7 | $50/mo | No | Firms building an FP&A advisory practice |
| Abacum Abacum | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams replacing spreadsheet-based planning |
Questions people ask
Does Prophix publish its pricing?
Prophix pricing is listed as unavailable here, and the comparison describes it as quote-only. A Reddit commenter said another vendor was priced much lower after negotiating with Prophix, but that is one buyer’s account, not a general price comparison. Ask both vendors for quotes based on the same requirements.
Which Prophix alternative is best for forecasting?
PlanGuru is positioned for detailed forecasts and multiple financial scenarios, while Jirav is aimed at multi-year forecasting and scenario modeling. Dryrun is the more focused choice for cash-flow scenarios. The right fit depends on whether your team needs broader FP&A planning or primarily wants to model cash.
Can I make Prophix model changes without outside help?
The published material does not establish how easy Prophix is to customize. In one Reddit thread, a prospective buyer asked about changing calculations, and a commenter said they wanted confidence they could make updates without third-party professional services. Ask for a walkthrough of the changes your team expects to handle.