We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
New Relic is listed from $10 with a free plan, but its user and ingest costs can rise. One Reddit poster said they mainly used it to investigate application problems during incidents and felt they were paying for features they did not need. That does not make a switch automatically cheaper: Reddit commenters warn that migration, storage and maintenance can erase open-source savings. The right alternative depends on whether you need APM, broader monitoring or incident response.
01Why people leave New Relic
Paying for features you rarely use
One r/devops poster used New Relic mainly to investigate application issues during incidents and felt the extra features made it too expensive.
Costs and contract concerns
The comparison flags rising user and ingest costs; another Reddit thread described being locked into a one-year contract.
A compliance requirement
A Reddit poster in PCI DSS said New Relic was not compliant for their use case. Verify your own requirements before switching.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad observability
DatadogDatadogDatadog is the closest fit here if you want broad monitoring coverage rather than a narrower incident-only tool: one Reddit commenter called it the most similar option to New Relic. It also covers observability and security, with AI features listed. Its starting price is $500, and the comparison warns that this figure does not show the full bill.
Trade-off: The listed $500 starting price does not establish your total cost.
6.7/10from
$500/mo - Flexible telemetry dashboards
GrafanaGrafanaGrafana suits teams willing to assemble a monitoring setup from multiple telemetry tools. Reddit commenters suggested Grafana with Loki, Tempo and Mimir, while the comparison highlights configurable dashboards and combining signals. It has a free plan and a listed $19 starting price, but usage charges can add to the bill. This is a flexible route, not a drop-in APM promise.
Trade-off: A Reddit commenter cautioned that Grafana components are not APM tools for method and SQL analysis.
7.0/10from
$19/mofree plan - Traces and logs
Scout APMScout APMScout APM is worth considering if your New Relic use centers on traces and logs together. Its listed fit also includes developers using AI coding agents and small workloads evaluating monitoring tools. The comparison lists a free plan and a $19 starting price, but flags plan limits—check whether they suit your workload before moving production monitoring.
Trade-off: Plan limits may constrain the workloads that fit the listed price.
6.5/10from
$19/mofree plan - Open-source monitoring
PrometheusPrometheusPrometheus fits teams that want open-source, cloud-native monitoring with PromQL-based queries and alerts. It is a plausible lower-license-cost path if you can own the tooling, rather than paying for a managed all-in-one product. The comparison lists a free plan and no starting price. Independent Prometheus servers use local storage, so plan around that constraint.
Trade-off: Independent servers use local storage; operating the stack is your responsibility.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Cloud-native observability
DynatraceDynatraceDynatrace is an option if you still want broad observability coverage and value topology-driven investigation, particularly in Kubernetes and cloud-native environments. The comparison lists it from $7, but also warns about an annual commitment. Treat that starting figure as a reason to request pricing details, not as a complete estimate of what your team will pay.
Trade-off: The annual commitment can make a low listed starting price less useful.
6.8/10from
$7/mo - No license fee
ZabbixZabbixZabbix may suit experienced teams trying to avoid per-host license fees while monitoring IT or OT infrastructure. It has a free plan and no listed starting price, but that does not mean the system costs nothing to run: the comparison warns that it takes work to configure well. Consider it when you have the skills to manage your own stack.
Trade-off: It takes work to configure well and manage.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Incident response
PagerDutyPagerDutyPagerDuty is a better fit when the goal is to standardize incident response, escalation workflows and on-call handling—not to replace New Relic's application analysis by itself. The comparison lists a free plan and a $21 starting price. It may complement a separate monitoring tool, so compare the combined cost and features against the response-time value you get today.
Trade-off: It focuses on incident response, not broad application monitoring.
6.3/10from
$21/mofree plan - Incident management
FireHydrantFireHydrantFireHydrant fits teams formalizing incident management with retrospectives and analytics. Like PagerDuty, it is a response-focused alternative rather than a direct replacement for New Relic's application investigation. The comparison lists a free plan and a $25 starting price, and says pricing depends on responders. Check plan caps and paging costs before you budget a switch.
Trade-off: Budget by responder and check plan caps and paging costs.
7.0/10from
$25/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 New Relic New Relic (current) | 7.5 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams consolidating observability tools |
| Datadog Datadog | 6.7 | $500/mo | No | Teams seeking broad monitoring coverage |
| Grafana Grafana | 7.0 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams combining multiple telemetry signals |
| Scout APM Scout APM | 6.5 | $19/mo | Yes | Teams wanting traces and logs together |
| Prometheus Prometheus | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source monitoring |
| Dynatrace Dynatrace | 6.8 | $7/mo | No | Teams needing broad observability coverage |
| Zabbix Zabbix | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams avoiding per-host license fees |
| PagerDuty PagerDuty | 6.3 | $21/mo | Yes | Teams standardizing incident response |
| FireHydrant FireHydrant | 7.0 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams formalizing incident response |
Questions people ask
Which New Relic alternative is most similar?
Datadog is the closest match among these picks for broad monitoring coverage; a Reddit commenter also called it the most similar option to New Relic. But similarity does not guarantee the same features or bill. The comparison lists Datadog from $500 and warns that the starting price does not show the full cost.
Can Grafana and Prometheus replace New Relic?
They can form a monitoring setup, but they are not automatically a like-for-like APM replacement. Reddit commenters recommend Grafana with Loki, Tempo and Mimir, while another cautions those tools do not provide the method and SQL analysis the poster wanted. Prometheus is free, but independent servers use local storage.
Is switching from New Relic to open source always cheaper?
No. Reddit commenters warn that migration, training, storage, deployment changes and ongoing maintenance can offset license savings. Prometheus has a free plan, and Zabbix has no listed license fee, but both require teams to manage their own setup. Compare total operating effort with New Relic's incident-response value.