We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Make starts at $12 and has a free plan, but its feature-dense, credit-metered setup may be more than light users need. A Reddit thread asking for alternatives specifically raised affordability, flexibility and use-case fit; commenters recommended options including Power Automate. Our shortlist covers seven alternatives, from IFTTT’s $2.09 starting price to enterprise platforms with unpublished pricing. Compare the listed starting prices carefully: they do not establish what a particular workload will cost.
01Why people leave Make
Cut costs for lighter use
Make is credit-metered, and its feature density may be poor value if your workflows are light or your budget is tight.
Find a more intuitive interface
In one Reddit thread, a commenter praised an alternative’s intuitive setup. That is one user’s view, not proof every Make user will prefer it.
Fit a specific ecosystem
People in a Reddit thread asked for tools better suited to particular use cases; a commenter recommended Power Automate for Microsoft-centric work.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierSwitch to Zapier if app coverage is the priority: its integration breadth is described as unmatched, and it suits non-technical users building simple workflows. The listing starts at $19.99 and includes a free plan. That is a higher listed starting price than Make’s $12, so check the billing model and expected task volume before moving.
Trade-off: Task-based pricing can get expensive fast, per Reddit users.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Developer-led AI workflows
n8nn8nn8n is a closer fit if you want deterministic steps alongside AI calls and have developers comfortable self-hosting. The listing starts at $20 with a free plan, and it highlights audited, re-runnable steps. That makes it worth comparing with Make for technical teams that want more control over workflow execution.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - Microsoft 365 workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate is the targeted switch for Microsoft 365 workflows, HR onboarding, approvals and attended desktop RPA. Its listed starting price is $15. A commenter in a Reddit automation thread also recommended it for repetitive tasks in the Microsoft ecosystem, though that is an individual recommendation rather than broad user evidence.
Trade-off: Bot and process-mining plans can limit value beyond Microsoft workflows.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Simple, low-cost automations
IFTTTIFTTTIFTTT is the lowest listed starting price in this shortlist at $2.09, and it has a free plan. It is aimed at simple app-to-app automations and smart-home connections, so it is a better match for straightforward tasks than complex, governed workflows. Compare its credit limits and polling speeds against what your automations need.
Trade-off: Credit limits and polling speeds may not fit every workflow.
6.8/10from
$2.09/mofree plan - Developer-built AI agents
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream suits teams building AI agents or production integrations across APIs, especially when managed OAuth matters. It starts at $99 and has a free plan. That price makes it a substantial step up from Make’s listed $12 starting point, so it is more relevant when the developer features match a real production need.
Trade-off: Budget for production usage and free-tier limits.
7.0/10from
$99/mofree plan - Governed IT automation
TinesTinesTines is worth considering for security and IT workflow builders, or teams that want to evaluate automation at no cost. It has a free plan, but paid pricing is not published on the vendor's site. Check the free workflow cap and get paid pricing before treating it as a budget replacement for Make.
Trade-off: Paid pricing is not published, and the free plan has a workflow cap.
7.3/10from
Freefree plan - Enterprise agent governance
WorkatoWorkatoWorkato is aimed at enterprises that need AI agent governance, non-developer-friendly automation or connections across many apps. Its starting price is not published on the vendor's site. It may suit organizations prioritizing those enterprise needs, but the available pricing information is not enough to judge whether switching from Make will reduce costs.
Trade-off: Pricing opacity and per-action billing create budget risks.
6.4/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Make Make (current) | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| IFTTT IFTTT | 6.8 | $2.09/mo | Yes | Simple app-to-app automations |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.0 | $99/mo | Yes | Teams building AI agents |
| Tines Tines | 7.3 | Free | Yes | Teams evaluating automation at no cost |
| Workato Workato | 6.4 | Custom | No | Enterprises needing AI agent governance |
Questions people ask
Which Make alternative has the lowest listed starting price?
IFTTT has the lowest listed starting price in this comparison at $2.09, and it offers a free plan. Make is listed from $12 with a free plan. These starting prices do not show what a particular workflow will cost; IFTTT’s credit limits and polling speeds may also affect fit.
Which Make alternative is best for Microsoft 365 workflows?
Power Automate is the most directly matched option in this list: it is positioned for Microsoft 365 workflows, HR onboarding, approvals and attended desktop RPA. Its listed starting price is $15. The published information also cautions that bot and process-mining plans can limit its value for broader use.
Which Make alternative suits technical teams building AI workflows?
n8n is positioned for teams combining deterministic steps with AI calls, and for developers comfortable self-hosting. Pipedream is aimed at teams building AI agents and production integrations across APIs. Their listed starting prices are $20 and $99, respectively; n8n’s cloud execution caps are described as tight for the price.