We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Invicti combines code and live-app scanning, but its pricing is not published and Reddit users report API coverage and workflow frustrations. The alternatives below are not all like-for-like DAST replacements: some focus on code, manual testing or secrets instead. We’ve ranked them by how well their stated use cases fit teams leaving Invicti, and called out where a switch means giving up breadth. Check each vendor’s current plan details before treating a starting price as your likely bill.
01Why people leave Invicti
API coverage may fall short
One Reddit thread cites limited GraphQL results and a need for business-logic testing; another commenter says API scanning is their biggest gap.
API discovery still needs work
A commenter says teams still chase owners for updated OpenAPI specs, despite Invicti adding API discovery capabilities.
Results and workflows disappoint
The original poster says the team is unhappy with results and wants accurate findings developers can interpret, with authenticated scans in CI/CD.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad AppSec coverage
SnykSnykSnyk is the closest fit here if you want to consolidate more than live-app scanning: its stated use cases include code and dependency security. The listed starting price is $25, with a free plan. That does not establish DAST parity with Invicti, and the published summary flags scan noise and opaque Enterprise costs, so compare coverage and pricing before switching.
Trade-off: Broad coverage, but DAST fit and Enterprise costs need checking.
6.2/10from
$25/mofree plan - Manual web testing
Burp SuiteBurp SuiteBurp Suite fits teams whose priority is manual web security testing rather than an Invicti-style all-in-one tool. The listing says there is a free Community option and a starting price of $41.58; the published summary says Professional costs $499 a year. Start with Community and move up only if its limits get in your way.
Trade-off: A manual-testing focus is not a like-for-like scanning replacement.
7.2/10from
$41.58/mofree plan - Code-focused SAST
SemgrepSemgrepSemgrep makes sense if the reason for leaving is a preference for code-focused scanning and custom rules. Its listed starting price is $15, and a free tier is available. The key limit is scope: the published summary says to look elsewhere if you need DAST in one platform, so Semgrep would cover a narrower part of Invicti’s stated code-and-live-app coverage.
Trade-off: Code scanning, not DAST in one platform.
7.6/10from
$15/mofree plan - SDLC governance
VeracodeVeracodeVeracode is worth considering if your buying brief is broader SDLC security coverage, governance and compliance rather than a direct DAST swap. The published summary also names securing AI-generated code as a use case. Pricing is not published on the vendor's site, so ask for a detailed quote and confirm which scanning needs it covers before comparing it with Invicti.
Trade-off: Pricing is unpublished, and DAST fit is not specified.
4.8/10from
Custom - Secret scanning
TruffleHogTruffleHogTruffleHog is a narrower option for teams whose real priority is finding and verifying leaked secrets, not replacing Invicti’s live-app scanning. The listing describes it as open-source, with a free plan, and highlights secret verification and remediation tracking. Paid pricing and limits are not published on the vendor's site, so budget clarity is a concern.
Trade-off: Secret scanning does not replace live-app testing.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan - Secrets monitoring
GitGuardianGitGuardianGitGuardian may fit if the team leaving Invicti is also reassessing developer and repository secret monitoring. Its stated use cases include small teams starting secrets monitoring and organizations governing machine identities; a free tier is listed. Paid-plan rates are not published here, and the published material does not position it as a DAST replacement.
Trade-off: No published paid rates; not a DAST replacement.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Invicti Invicti (current) | 6.8 | Custom | No | Teams consolidating AppSec tools |
| Snyk Snyk | 6.2 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams securing code and dependencies |
| Burp Suite Burp Suite | 7.2 | $41.58/mo | Yes | Manual web security testing |
| Semgrep Semgrep | 7.6 | $15/mo | Yes | Teams prioritizing code-focused SAST |
| Veracode Veracode | 4.8 | Custom | No | Teams seeking broad SDLC security coverage |
| TruffleHog TruffleHog | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source secret scanning |
| GitGuardian GitGuardian | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Small teams starting secrets monitoring |
Questions people ask
Which Invicti alternative is best for API scanning?
The published details do not establish that any of these six is a direct API-scanning replacement for Invicti. Snyk and Veracode are described in broader security terms, while Burp Suite is positioned for manual web testing. If API coverage is the reason you are leaving, confirm support for your API types and authenticated CI/CD workflow with vendors before shortlisting.
Which alternative is best for code scanning?
Semgrep is the clearest code-focused option in this list: its stated fit is code-focused SAST and custom rules, with a free plan and a listed starting price of $15. It is not the choice if you need DAST in one platform, according to the published summary.
How much does Invicti cost compared with these alternatives?
Invicti pricing is not published on the vendor's site. Listed starting prices include $25 for Snyk, $41.58 for Burp Suite and $15 for Semgrep, each with a free plan. Veracode, TruffleHog paid plans and GitGuardian paid plans have no published rates in the published details; verify current pricing with vendors.