We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Invicti.
Choose Invicti if you need one AppSec platform spanning proof-based DAST, SAST, open-source risk, IaC, secrets, and vulnerability management. Choose Snyk if developer workflows, AI-code security, and published entry pricing matter more: it has a free plan and Team at $25 per month for up to 10 developers. Invicti does not publish subscription prices; its Agentic Pentest is capped at $500 per pentest. Snyk’s Enterprise pricing is also custom and credit-based, so neither gives a simple enterprise cost comparison.
01Side by side
| Invicti | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Subscription prices not published; pentest max $500 | $0 free; Team $25/month |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | Free plan with published test caps |
| Best for | Teams securing code, runtime, and supply chain | Developers securing code, agents, and AI apps |
| Core strength | Proof-based DAST and runtime-linked AppSec findings | Developer-focused code and AI security |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations and findings | Runtime validation; maps vulnerabilities to developers | IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations |
| Team and seat costs | Subscription and per-seat costs not published | $25/month for teams up to 10 developers |
| Support | Support terms not published | Next-business-day support on Team |
Invicti Choose Invicti if
- Choose Invicti if you need proof-based DAST for web apps and APIs.
- Choose Invicti if code, runtime, and supply-chain findings need one view.
- Choose Invicti if you want a pentest option capped at $500.
Snyk Choose Snyk if
- Choose Snyk if you want a free plan with published test caps.
- Choose Snyk if Team’s $25 monthly price and 10-developer cap fit.
- Choose Snyk if IDE, CI/CD, and AI-assistant integrations matter.
02Pricing compared
Invicti does not publish monthly or annual subscription prices for Web + API, AppSec Core, or AppSec Flex, so you cannot compare its main plans with Snyk’s entry pricing from the listed figures. Its Agentic Pentest is capped at $500 per pentest; that is not a monthly subscription price.
Snyk has a free plan with limits of 5 projects, 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests per month, and 300 IaC and 100 Container tests. Team costs $25 per month for up to 10 developers, with 100 projects and 1,000 Code tests per month. Enterprise pricing is custom and credit-based: credits cost $1 each, are prepaid for the contract term, and excess usage is invoiced in arrears. Snyk is easier to price at entry level; neither vendor publishes a simple Enterprise total.
03Features and depth
Invicti’s stated scope covers testing live web applications and APIs, scanning code, and managing findings. Its DAST uses proof-based scanning to validate findings; its SAST connects static findings with runtime vulnerabilities, code ownership, and remediation guidance. It also lists open-source dependency risk, SBOMs, license checks, IaC scanning, secrets detection, and vulnerability management that deduplicates findings from security tools.
Snyk’s pitch centers on developer workflows and AI security: validating AI-generated code, protecting development agents, governing AI applications, and continuous offensive security. It also lists vulnerability remediation and integrations with IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and AI coding assistants. Its listed plans include Code, Open Source, IaC, and Container tests, but the published material does not detail a proof-based DAST capability comparable to Invicti’s. Choose based on whether runtime application testing and broad AppSec coverage or developer and AI-code workflows are the priority.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The available product information does not establish which platform is easier to set up or use, so we would not treat either as the low-friction choice without checking your workflows. Snyk’s listed IDE, CI/CD, and AI coding assistant integrations point to a developer-workflow focus; Team also includes next-business-day support.
Invicti combines code, runtime, supply-chain, and vulnerability-management functions, which may suit teams trying to consolidate those areas, but the published material does not describe onboarding or training requirements. Compare how each product fits your existing tools, what your team needs to configure, and which findings it will own. Snyk’s Free plan offers a capped way to start; Invicti’s subscription prices are not published.
Questions people ask
What does Invicti security do?
Invicti is an AppSec platform for scanning code, testing live web applications and APIs, and managing vulnerabilities. Its listed capabilities include proof-based DAST, SAST, dependency and license risk checks, IaC scanning, secrets detection, and deduplicating findings from security tools.
Is OWASP still relevant?
The published Invicti and Snyk materials do not discuss OWASP or its current relevance, so they are not enough to answer that question. For this comparison, the documented distinction is that Invicti emphasizes proof-based testing of running apps and APIs, while Snyk highlights developer and AI-code security workflows.
What are the top 10 SCA tools?
The published materials do not compare or rank ten software composition analysis tools, so we cannot provide a sourced top-10 list. They do say Invicti finds vulnerable dependencies, generates SBOMs, and flags risky licenses; Snyk’s listed plans include Open Source tests.
Why is Snyk used?
Snyk is positioned for finding, fixing, and verifying vulnerabilities in developer workflows. Its listed integrations include IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and AI coding assistants, and its platform also covers AI-generated code, development agents, and AI application governance. Team is listed at $25 per month for up to 10 developers.