We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
If you’re leaving Imprivata, first separate the problem you need to solve: shared-workstation access, workforce identity, or broader access governance. The available material doesn’t establish that any alternative here matches Imprivata’s shared-workstation workflows. Okta and OneLogin are workforce IAM options; RapidIdentity explicitly lists healthcare among its use cases; Auth0, Lumos, and Opal cover other identity or governance needs. Prices are incomplete, so treat “from” figures as starting points, not a migration budget.
01Why people leave Imprivata
Pricing is hard to size
Imprivata’s pricing is described as opaque, making it difficult to compare total costs from the available information.
Check user-context integrations
One Reddit thread says Zscaler saw a generic service account instead of the user context; commenters point to SSO or IWA setup as possible issues.
Public complaints are limited
The Reddit threads we read don’t establish broad dissatisfaction with Imprivata. One describes a Zscaler integration issue; another criticizes Vocera, not Imprivata.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad workforce identity
OktaOktaOkta is a fit to consider if your replacement search is about broad identity integrations and managing workforce access, rather than a narrowly defined shared-workstation workflow. The listing says it also supports organizations managing customer access. Its listed starting price is $6, but the source warns buyers to check higher-tier costs and migration effort before committing.
Trade-off: Higher-tier costs and migration effort need checking; exact pricing details aren’t supplied.
7.0/10from
$6/mo - Lower listed entry price
OneLoginOneLoginOneLogin is listed for small teams needing workforce SSO, app provisioning, and hybrid identity environments. That makes it worth considering if those are the access needs behind your Imprivata exit. Its listed starting price is $3. The listing also says Basic is capped, but the cap and other costs aren’t specified in the published material.
Trade-off: Basic is capped, and several costs remain unpublished.
7.0/10from
$3/mo - Healthcare IAM
RapidIdentityRapidIdentityRapidIdentity is the alternative here whose listing explicitly names healthcare organizations seeking IAM. It may suit a buyer evaluating identity management in a healthcare setting, though the listed best-fit uses also center on schools and colleges. The published information gives no starting price, so request a quote and confirm which workflows it covers before treating it as a replacement.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and the listing emphasizes education use cases.
5.2/10from
Custom - Granular app access
Auth0Auth0Auth0 is listed for enterprise SSO and SCIM, apps managing user and machine identity, and organizations needing granular access controls. Consider it if your switch is driven by application identity or access-control requirements rather than shared-workstation access. The listing shows $35 and also notes a free plan; the published material doesn’t clarify plan boundaries or the MAU caps.
Trade-off: Check MAU caps and total cost; plan boundaries aren’t provided.
6.3/10from
$35/mofree plan - Automated access reviews
LumosLumosLumos is listed for governing employee and machine access, managing AI agent access, and automating access reviews. It’s a possible direction if your Imprivata evaluation has broadened into access governance. The listing says pricing is not published, so there’s no public starting figure here to compare against Imprivata. Ask for pricing and confirm the scope before making a shortlist decision.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, making early cost comparison difficult.
6.5/10from
Custom - Time-limited access
OpalOpalOpal is listed for governing access across identity types, time-limited privileged access, and formal access approvals and reviews. Consider it if governance and approval processes matter more than replicating a specific shared-workstation workflow. Its listing shows $39 and a free plan, but also flags meaningful seat minimums and incomplete public pricing; confirm the minimum before comparing costs.
Trade-off: Meaningful seat minimums and incomplete public pricing.
6.0/10from
$39/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Imprivata Imprivata (current) | 6.2 | Custom | No | Organizations needing layered access controls |
| Okta Okta | 7.0 | $6/mo | No | Teams needing broad identity integrations |
| OneLogin OneLogin | 7.0 | $3/mo | No | Small teams needing workforce SSO |
| RapidIdentity RapidIdentity | 5.2 | Custom | No | Schools managing digital identities |
| Auth0 Auth0 | 6.3 | $35/mo | Yes | Teams needing enterprise SSO and SCIM |
| Lumos Lumos | 6.5 | Custom | No | Teams governing employee and machine access |
| Opal Opal | 6.0 | $39/mo | Yes | Teams governing access across many identity types |
Questions people ask
Which Imprivata alternative is closest for healthcare?
RapidIdentity’s listing explicitly names healthcare organizations seeking IAM, while also emphasizing schools and colleges. That makes it a relevant option to evaluate, not proof of a like-for-like replacement. The published information doesn’t say whether it supports Imprivata’s shared-workstation workflows, so confirm that requirement directly.
Which alternatives have public starting prices?
The pricing page show OneLogin from $3, Okta from $6, Auth0 at $35 with a free plan, and Opal at $39 with a free plan. Lumos and RapidIdentity have no starting price listed. These figures don’t establish total cost, and the material doesn’t provide all plan boundaries or billing details.
Do Reddit users give a clear reason to leave Imprivata?
Not from the Reddit threads we read. One Reddit thread describes Zscaler seeing a generic service account rather than the user context, with commenters discussing SSO or IWA configuration. Another thread complains about Vocera after a move from a Spok/Imprivata setup; the complaints target Vocera, not Imprivata.