We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
The best IFTTT replacement depends on why you’re leaving. Zapier is a straightforward option for broad app coverage; Make offers a lower listed starting price and more technical controls; n8n suits teams willing to self-host. All three list free plans. Reddit users report leaving over IFTTT’s free-account applet limit, slow responses and integrations that disappeared, though those reports don’t establish current limits or availability.
01Why people leave IFTTT
Free-plan limits and pricing
One Reddit thread reported a three-custom-applet cap on free accounts. The current listing shows a free plan and a starting price of $2.09.
Slow responses and lost integrations
Some Reddit users report slow response times and discontinued integrations, including Alexa. These are user reports, not a complete service-availability list.
Simple automations can hit a ceiling
Home Assistant users say they moved for local control or more complex automations; others report that native app features replaced their IFTTT workflows.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierSwitch to Zapier if your main problem is finding connections between apps: its listing names broad app coverage and simple workflows for non-technical users as strengths. It has a free plan, with a listed starting price of $19.99. That makes it a plausible IFTTT step-up when you want to coordinate more services without building everything yourself.
Trade-off: Task-based pricing can get expensive, according to Reddit users.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Technical workflows
MakeMakeMake is a fit if IFTTT’s simple applets no longer cover the workflows you want to build. Its listing highlights custom JavaScript or Python, governance and AI-agent workflows, with a free plan and a $12 starting price. That’s a lower listed starting price than Zapier’s, though the credit-metered model may take more planning.
Trade-off: Credit metering is less forgiving for light or budget use.
7.0/10from
$12/mofree plan - Self-hosted control
n8nn8nConsider n8n if you want more control than a basic applet and are comfortable managing infrastructure. Its listing names self-hosting, audited and re-runnable steps, and workflows that mix rules with AI calls. It has a free plan and a listed starting price of $20, giving technical users another route beyond IFTTT’s hosted approach.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price, per the listing.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - Microsoft workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomatePower Automate makes more sense than IFTTT when the work is centered on Microsoft 365, HR onboarding or approvals. The listing also covers attended desktop RPA, with a starting price of $15. It is a more specific choice than a general app-to-app hub, so it fits Microsoft-centric teams better than casual smart-home automations.
Trade-off: Bot and process-mining plans limit its value for broader use.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Developer integrations
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream is aimed at developers building integrations across APIs, rather than people looking for the simplest applet builder. Its listing highlights managed OAuth, production integrations and AI-agent work. It has a free plan, with a listed starting price of $99, so check the usage and free-tier limits before moving production workflows.
Trade-off: Budget for production users, usage and free-tier limits.
7.0/10from
$99/mofree plan - IT and security
TinesTinesTines is worth considering if you’re leaving IFTTT to automate security or IT work, or want to evaluate a tool without paying upfront. Its listing describes a free entry point and governed automation for organizations. That makes it a different kind of replacement: better aligned with managed team workflows than personal app and smart-home connections.
Trade-off: Paid pricing is not published; the free workflow cap is a catch.
7.3/10from
Freefree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 IFTTT IFTTT (current) | 6.8 | $2.09/mo | Yes | Simple app-to-app automations |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| Make Make | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.0 | $99/mo | Yes | Teams building AI agents |
| Tines Tines | 7.3 | Free | Yes | Teams evaluating automation at no cost |
Questions people ask
Is IFTTT a workflow automation tool?
Yes. IFTTT is listed for simple app-to-app automations and smart-home service connections. Reddit users describe using it for applets and integrations, but some say its limits or missing connections pushed them to other tools. Whether it fits depends on how complex your workflows are.
How can I get IFTTT for free?
The listing includes a free plan. One Reddit thread reported a limit of three custom applets on free accounts, but that post does not confirm the current cap. Check IFTTT’s pricing page for the terms that apply now before moving workflows onto the free plan.
What is the best automation app for Android?
The published information does not establish one best Android automation app. IFTTT is listed for simple app-to-app and smart-home connections, while some Reddit commenters say it is less useful on phones. Zapier and Make are alternatives for app workflows, but neither is specifically identified here as an Android specialist.