We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
KnowBe4 and Phished are the closest alternatives here for phishing simulations and security awareness training. The rest focus on policy, compliance or broader risk work, so they are not like-for-like Hoxhunt replacements. The Reddit feedback provided is limited: one commenter says Hoxhunt’s gamification may suit some workforces better than others, while another buyer says it looks close to their needs. Compare your training scope, automation requirements and budget, then ask vendors to confirm plan limits and migration details.
01Why people leave Hoxhunt
Gamification may not fit everyone
A commenter on r/cybersecurity says Hoxhunt’s gamified leaderboard may work better for some workforce age groups than others.
You need a different training mix
One Reddit buyer was comparing phishing tools while keeping existing training. Check whether you need simulations, training content, or both.
You want clearer buying details
Hoxhunt pricing is listed as unavailable here. Ask for a quote and confirm plan limits before comparing it with alternatives.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Phishing and training
KnowBe4KnowBe4KnowBe4 is the closest alternative for teams comparing phishing simulations and training libraries. Its listed starting price is $2.40 per seat monthly on a three-year term. Reddit commenters praise its content breadth and customization; one says configuring templates takes some setup. That makes it worth comparing if you want a different content approach and are comfortable with a longer contract.
Trade-off: The listed price requires a three-year term; Reddit users report some template setup work.
6.8/10from
$2.40/mo - Automated phishing training
PhishedPhishedPhished is a direct comparison for teams looking to automate phishing simulations and build security awareness training. Its listing also highlights employee threat guidance. The starting price is $175, but the pricing details and plan limits need clarification, so request a quote that spells out what is included before treating it as cheaper than Hoxhunt.
Trade-off: Starting-price units and plan limits need clarification.
6.2/10from
$175/mo - Policy and accreditation
PowerDMSPowerDMSPowerDMS is a better fit if the reason for switching is broader than phishing training: its listing focuses on policy, training and accreditation for high-compliance organizations and agencies. That may suit teams trying to connect training with policy or accreditation work. It is not presented as a direct phishing-simulation replacement, and its price is not published.
Trade-off: No published price or customer feedback is provided; phishing simulations are not listed.
6.3/10from
Custom - Compliance workflows
VantaVantaVanta is an adjacent option for teams whose security program includes several compliance workflows, recurring security questionnaires and vendor risk management. Those needs may matter more than gamified awareness training if your evaluation has widened beyond phishing. The listing warns that smaller teams may not need this tooling, and it gives no public price.
Trade-off: Not a direct training substitute; pricing is not public.
6.4/10from
Custom - Governance and GRC
Diligent One PlatformDiligent One PlatformDiligent One Platform suits organizations consolidating governance and GRC tools, managing board meeting workflows, or assessing vendor and cyber risk. Consider it if you are replacing a wider set of risk processes rather than looking only for Hoxhunt’s adaptive simulations and training. Its listing provides no public price, so budget comparison requires a quote.
Trade-off: Broader governance focus, not a listed phishing-training replacement; price is unavailable.
5.5/10from
Custom - Enterprise GRC programs
AnecdotesAnecdotesAnecdotes is aimed at enterprises managing multiple GRC programs, vendor risk workflows and framework coverage. It may belong on the shortlist if your Hoxhunt evaluation is part of a broader effort to consolidate risk and compliance work. The listing notes included AI but no public price or relevant user feedback, so value is hard to compare.
Trade-off: GRC-focused rather than phishing-training-focused; pricing is not published.
6.3/10from
Custom
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Hoxhunt Hoxhunt (current) | 6.5 | Custom | No | Organizations wanting adaptive phishing simulations |
| KnowBe4 KnowBe4 | 6.8 | $2.40/mo | No | Teams needing phishing simulations |
| Phished Phished | 6.2 | $175/mo | No | Teams automating phishing simulations |
| PowerDMS PowerDMS | 6.3 | Custom | No | High-compliance organizations |
| Vanta Vanta | 6.4 | Custom | No | Teams managing several compliance workflows |
| Diligent One Platform Diligent One Platform | 5.5 | Custom | No | Organizations consolidating governance and GRC tools |
| Anecdotes Anecdotes | 6.3 | Custom | No | Enterprises managing multiple GRC programs |
Questions people ask
Which Hoxhunt alternative is closest for phishing training?
KnowBe4 and Phished are the closest matches in this list: both are described as covering phishing simulations and security awareness training. KnowBe4’s listing gives a starting price of $2.40 per seat monthly on a three-year term. Phished starts at $175, but the pricing units and plan limits need clarification.
How much does Hoxhunt cost compared with alternatives?
Hoxhunt pricing is listed as unavailable in the published information, so we can’t make a direct price comparison. KnowBe4 lists $2.40 per seat monthly for a three-year term. Phished lists a $175 starting price, but its unit and plan limits are not specified here. Ask both vendors for comparable quotes.
What should we confirm before switching from Hoxhunt?
Ask vendors to confirm the simulations, training content, automation and plan limits included in your quote. The Reddit feedback here is limited: one commenter says Hoxhunt’s gamification may depend on workforce fit, and another buyer says it looked close to their needs. Also ask about migration steps and any contract terms; those details are not published here.