We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Codility is listed from $400, so switching may make sense if you need a different assessment approach or want to consolidate recruiting tools. HackerRank is the closest technical-hiring alternative here; Criteria also combines assessments and interviews. The other picks are recruiting platforms, not direct coding-test replacements. Reddit threads include candidates describing timed tests as discouraging or difficult to prepare for, but those accounts are individual experiences, not a measure of every Codility assessment.
01Why people leave Codility
Timed tests can feel unlike the job
In one Reddit thread, developers argued that timed challenges test performance under pressure more than day-to-day development. That is a candidate concern, not a universal verdict.
Preparation can become its own burden
A Reddit poster with years of Java experience worried about preparing for a Codility test after moving into management. Another thread discussed practicing specific question pools.
The entry price needs a fit check
Codility is listed from $400. If your need is broader recruiting software—or another assessment and interview mix—compare the actual workflow before paying for a switch.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Technical hiring
HackerRankHackerRankHackerRank is the closest fit if you want to replace Codility with another technical-hiring platform. The listing describes it as feature-rich, with options for AI fluency assessment, pair-programming interviews, and structured technical screening for small teams. It starts at $165 and has a free plan, giving you a lower listed entry price than Codility’s $400 starting point.
Trade-off: Attempt caps and mixed candidate feedback are part of the trade-off.
5.9/10from
$165/mofree plan - Assessments and interviews
CriteriaCriteriaCriteria is worth comparing if your hiring process needs assessments alongside interviews, rather than a coding-test tool alone. Its listed coverage also includes employee development tools, which may suit teams broadening their use beyond screening. Pricing is not published, so ask for a quote and confirm what assessment and interview capabilities are included before treating it as a like-for-like replacement.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published, and candidate concerns are noted.
5.4/10from
Custom - Recruiting stack
AshbyAshbyAshby is an adjacent option for teams considering a wider recruiting-stack change, not a direct coding-assessment substitute. The listing highlights bundled recruiting tools and built-in analytics, including analytics for organizations that already have an ATS. Its listed starting price is $360; the plan note also describes a $400/month entry plan, so confirm the current plan and limits with Ashby.
Trade-off: Larger plans hide their prices, and entry-plan limits apply.
6.0/10from
$360/mo - ATS and CRM
LeverLeverLever makes more sense if leaving Codility is part of reworking recruiting operations, especially when you want an ATS and recruiting CRM together. The listing also points to passive-candidate pipelines, hiring analytics, and AI. It is not presented as a coding-test replacement, and there is no public price here, so compare its workflow against your wider hiring needs.
Trade-off: No public price or relevant Reddit feedback settles the value question.
6.2/10from
Custom - Keep your ATS
GemGemGem is an adjacent choice if the bigger problem is several recruiting tools rather than Codility’s assessment workflow alone. Its listing describes broad recruiting coverage and says recruiters can keep their current ATS; it also identifies a free plan and a $130 starting price. Treat it as a recruiting-tool consolidation option, not a like-for-like technical assessment product.
Trade-off: Custom pricing is opaque, so the listed starting price may not settle your budget.
7.0/10from
$130/mofree plan - Recruiting CRM
CATSCATSCATS is relevant if you are considering replacing more of the recruiting process, not just the technical test. The listing combines ATS and recruiting CRM coverage and calls out candidate-stage automation, with agency workflows for clients and applicants. It starts at $95 per user, making seat count important when comparing total cost with Codility.
Trade-off: It is an ATS and CRM, not a listed coding-assessment replacement.
6.5/10from
$95/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Codility Codility (current) | 6.0 | $400/mo | No | Teams hiring across technical and business roles |
| HackerRank HackerRank | 5.9 | $165/mo | Yes | Teams assessing AI fluency |
| Criteria Criteria | 5.4 | Custom | No | Teams combining assessments and interviews |
| Ashby Ashby | 6.0 | $360/mo | No | Teams consolidating recruiting tools |
| Lever Lever | 6.2 | Custom | No | Teams combining ATS and recruiting CRM |
| Gem Gem | 7.0 | $130/mo | Yes | Startups with 1–10 FTE |
| CATS CATS | 6.5 | $95/mo | No | Recruiters needing ATS and CRM together |
Questions people ask
What is the closest Codility alternative?
HackerRank is the closest match among these options: its listing describes a technical hiring platform with AI fluency assessment, pair-programming interviews, and structured technical screening. It starts at $165 and has a free plan. Criteria is another assessment-oriented option, but its listing covers assessments and interviews and does not publish pricing.
How much does Codility cost compared with alternatives?
The pricing page puts Codility at $400. HackerRank starts at $165 with a free plan, Criteria has no published price, Ashby is listed from $360, and CATS starts at $95 per user. These are listed entry prices, not a full cost comparison; confirm plans, limits, and quote terms before switching.
Do Codility tests reflect real development work?
There is no universal answer in the published material. One Reddit thread includes developers arguing that timed tests can reward test-taking under pressure more than practical work; another poster described preparing for a test despite years of Java experience. Those are individual reports, so assess whether your own hiring tasks match the role.