We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Cloudways starts at $4, but switching is not just a price comparison: you may be trading managed infrastructure for more responsibility. One Reddit poster said they paid $28 monthly for a 2GB plan with 50GB of disk space; other commenters described a learning curve. We’ve picked seven alternatives for different workloads, including managed app platforms, cloud providers and a managed WordPress option. Compare the published starting prices with the work your team is willing to own.
01Why people leave Cloudways
The bill feels high
One Reddit poster reported paying $28 monthly for a 2GB plan with 50GB of disk space.
The setup has a learning curve
Commenters described Cloudways as less hands-on than raw cloud hosting, but not completely beginner-friendly.
You want a different workload fit
Cloudways supports multiple app types; a more focused platform may suit teams prioritizing app deployment or managed site workflows.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Managed app workflows
RenderRenderRender is a fit if you want managed deployment workflows rather than Cloudways-style cloud infrastructure management. It supports several app components and pull-request previews, and its listed starting price is $25 with a free plan. Our comparison notes that setup reports are positive, making it a candidate for teams moving app components and databases.
Trade-off: Budget for compute on top of the workspace plan.
7.8/10from
$25/mofree plan - One cloud account
DigitalOceanDigitalOceanDigitalOcean suits developers who want one cloud account for apps and AI agents, or a low-cost starting point for small projects. Its listed starting price is $4 with a free plan. Compared with a managed hosting layer, this is a move toward using a cloud platform directly; our comparison flags add-ons and usage as potential bill increases.
Trade-off: Add-ons and usage can push the bill higher.
6.8/10from
$4/mofree plan - Managed site operations
PantheonPantheonFor teams mainly running WordPress or Drupal sites, Pantheon offers managed site workflows and governance rather than general-purpose cloud infrastructure. Our comparison also lists Next.js operations as a fit. Its free plan and $41.67 starting price make it worth comparing if site operations matter more than finding the cheapest hosting option.
Trade-off: Budget for both workspace and per-site plans.
7.1/10from
$41.67/mofree plan - Managed app hosting
HerokuHerokuHeroku is a possible fit for personal or low-traffic apps and teams that want managed app infrastructure. Our comparison specifically calls out apps using Heroku Postgres or Redis. Its listed starting price is $5, but that headline price does not cover always-on service, which starts at $7 per month.
Trade-off: Always-on service starts at $7; larger plans get expensive.
5.8/10from
$5/mo - Flexible cloud infrastructure
VultrVultrVultr is worth comparing if you want flexible cloud infrastructure and are comfortable evaluating compute options yourself. Our comparison highlights hourly compute, GPU and bare-metal workloads. Unlike options with a listed monthly entry price, Vultr’s starting price is not published on the vendor's site, so check the plan details before estimating savings.
Trade-off: Starting price is not published; check support expectations.
7.7/10from
Custom - Price-conscious workloads
Hetzner CloudHetzner CloudHetzner Cloud is a candidate for small apps, services and test servers where a monthly cap matters. Its listed starting price is $5.99. Our comparison positions it as a price-conscious cloud option, but notes that published details beyond the entry tiers are limited, so verify the fit before moving production workloads.
Trade-off: Published details are limited beyond the entry tiers.
6.9/10from
€5.99/mo - Managed deployments
VercelVercelVercel fits teams prioritizing managed deployments, especially Next.js teams that value developer experience. Our comparison also lists AI and sandbox infrastructure as use cases. Its free plan and $20 Pro starting price give you a clear point of comparison with Cloudways, but the listed Pro price is not the whole story if usage is metered.
Trade-off: Budget for metered usage beyond the $20 Pro plan.
7.4/10from
$20/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Cloudways Cloudways (current) | 6.8 | $4/mo | No | Teams hosting multiple app types |
| Render Render | 7.8 | $25/mo | Yes | Teams deploying several app components |
| DigitalOcean DigitalOcean | 6.8 | $4/mo | Yes | Developers who want one cloud account |
| Pantheon Pantheon | 7.1 | $41.67/mo | Yes | Teams governing many websites |
| Heroku Heroku | 5.8 | $5/mo | No | Personal and low-traffic apps |
| Vultr Vultr | 7.7 | Custom | No | Developers needing flexible cloud infrastructure |
| Hetzner Cloud Hetzner Cloud | 6.9 | €5.99/mo | No | Small apps and services |
| Vercel Vercel | 7.4 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams prioritizing managed deployments |
Questions people ask
What is the cheapest Cloudways alternative here?
DigitalOcean has the lowest listed starting price in this shortlist at $4, with a free plan. Hetzner Cloud starts at $5.99. Those prices are not enough to establish your full bill: our comparison warns that DigitalOcean add-ons and usage can raise costs, and says Hetzner’s published details beyond entry tiers are limited.
Which alternative keeps hosting more managed?
Render lists managed workflows and databases, while Pantheon focuses on managed site workflows and governance for WordPress, Drupal and Next.js operations. Heroku is another option for managed app infrastructure. Compare each against your workload: the published material does not provide a like-for-like measure of how much infrastructure work each removes.
Should I leave Cloudways just to save money?
Not without checking what responsibility moves with the workload. One Reddit commenter described cheaper VPS setups paired with management software as a way to save, but said teams take on more responsibility when things break. The alternatives here vary: some emphasize managed deployments, while cloud providers emphasize flexible infrastructure.