We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Checkr starts at $24.99 and lists a free plan, but Reddit users report concerns about accuracy, check scope and requests for more information. The alternatives here are mostly recruiting platforms—not direct background-screening substitutes. They may help you change your hiring workflow, but don’t assume they replace criminal, employment or other verification checks. For a true screening replacement, confirm the checks offered, coverage, dispute process and price directly with the vendor; those details aren’t provided here.
01Why people leave Checkr
Reported accuracy problems
A commenter in an HR thread said candidates had convictions attributed to them incorrectly, while others with prior convictions came back clean.
Unclear check scope
In a Reddit thread, candidates questioned whether a general Checkr check covered employment or education as well as criminal history.
More information requests
One candidate said Checkr asked for more information; another thread discusses using documents for employment verification.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Assessments and interviews
CriteriaCriteriaCriteria is the closest fit here for employers rethinking candidate evaluation: its listed coverage combines assessments and interviews. That could help change parts of your hiring process if Checkr’s reported accuracy concerns have made you reconsider your screening workflow. But Criteria is not presented as a background-check provider, so confirm separately how you’ll handle verification.
Trade-off: Pricing is not published; request a custom quote.
5.4/10from
Custom - Recruiting teams
CATSCATSCATS combines an ATS and recruiting CRM, with candidate-stage workflow automation. Consider it if you’re changing how applicants move through hiring after a frustrating Checkr experience. It is a recruiting workflow platform, not a stated replacement for background checks. The listed starting price is $95, so check what that price covers before budgeting a move.
Trade-off: Per-user pricing may add up as the team grows.
6.5/10from
$95/mo - Hiring automation
ParadoxParadoxParadox focuses on automating hiring tasks across multiple stages, and it can sit alongside an existing system of record. That makes it an option if your goal is to change hiring operations rather than simply swap screening vendors. The available information does not establish that it provides background checks, so treat it as an adjacent tool.
Trade-off: Pricing and plan limits are not published.
6.2/10from
Custom - Consolidating recruiting tools
AshbyAshbyAshby bundles recruiting tools and includes recruiting analytics, which may suit teams trying to consolidate their stack while reviewing candidate workflows. It is not listed as a background-check substitute. The published pricing lists a starting price of $360, while larger plans hide their prices; ask which plan covers your needs.
Trade-off: Higher-tier pricing is not public, and plans have limits.
6.0/10from
$360/mo - ATS and CRM
LeverLeverLever combines an ATS and recruiting CRM, with passive-candidate pipelines, hiring analytics and AI among its listed strengths. It may fit teams that want to change recruiting operations after reviewing their Checkr process. There is no public price or relevant Reddit feedback in the published information, and Lever is not identified as a screening provider.
Trade-off: No public price to compare before requesting a quote.
6.2/10from
Custom - Staffing firms
BullhornBullhornBullhorn is aimed at staffing firms consolidating ATS and CRM tools, with recruiting workflow automation and back-office tools for North American agencies. It may be worth considering if your Checkr concerns sit within a broader staffing workflow change. The published starting price is $99, but AI and front-to-back operations require a quote.
Trade-off: Get a quote for AI or front-to-back operations.
7.2/10from
$99/mo - Recruiting tool consolidation
GemGemGem is positioned for teams replacing several recruiting tools while keeping their current ATS. That can help if the Checkr switch is part of a wider effort to simplify recruiting software, but it does not replace background screening based on the published details. The listing shows a $130 starting price and a free plan.
Trade-off: Custom pricing makes the total cost harder to judge.
7.0/10from
$130/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Checkr Checkr (current) | 5.7 | $24.99/mo | Yes | Landlords screening tenants |
| Criteria Criteria | 5.4 | Custom | No | Teams combining assessments and interviews |
| CATS CATS | 6.5 | $95/mo | No | Recruiters needing ATS and CRM together |
| Paradox Paradox | 6.2 | Custom | No | Organizations automating hiring tasks |
| Ashby Ashby | 6.0 | $360/mo | No | Teams consolidating recruiting tools |
| Lever Lever | 6.2 | Custom | No | Teams combining ATS and recruiting CRM |
| Bullhorn Bullhorn | 7.2 | $99/mo | No | Staffing firms consolidating ATS and CRM |
| Gem Gem | 7.0 | $130/mo | Yes | Startups with 1–10 FTE |
Questions people ask
Can these tools replace Checkr background checks?
Not based on the published information. These alternatives are described as ATS, CRM, recruiting automation, assessment or interview platforms. None is identified here as a direct background-screening replacement. Confirm the checks and verification services each vendor offers before ending a Checkr contract.
Why are employers considering leaving Checkr?
Reddit users report concerns about inaccurate results, uncertainty over what a general check covers and requests for more information. These are user reports, not verified findings about every Checkr check. Employers should review their own screening requirements and investigate any disputed result before deciding to switch.
Which Checkr alternatives publish a starting price?
The pricing page show starting prices for CATS ($95), Ashby ($360), Bullhorn ($99) and Gem ($130, with a free plan). Prices for Criteria, Paradox and Lever are not published on the vendor's site. Confirm billing terms and plan coverage with each vendor.