We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Bullhorn is listed from $99 and is positioned for staffing firms combining ATS and CRM workflows. The comparison advises getting a quote before budgeting for AI or front-to-back operations. We found no relevant Bullhorn complaints in the Reddit discussion we read: those threads discuss bicycle handlebars. Treat the options below as alternatives to evaluate against your workflow, not as proof of why Bullhorn customers leave.
01Why people leave Bullhorn
Reddit does not establish churn reasons
The Reddit threads we read are about bicycle handlebars, not Bullhorn, so they offer no evidence about customer complaints or reasons for leaving.
AI and operations need a quote
Bullhorn is listed from $99, but the comparison says to get a quote before budgeting for AI or front-to-back operations.
Your recruiting priorities may differ
If you are comparing ATS, CRM, analytics, sourcing or automation needs, the alternatives below cover different combinations; check which actually fits your team.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- ATS + CRM
CATSCATSCATS is the closest fit here if you want to compare another ATS and recruiting CRM in one product. The comparison highlights candidate-stage workflow automation and tracking clients as well as applicants, which suits agencies weighing Bullhorn’s staffing focus. CATS is listed from $95, so compare the per-user cost against your team size and required workflows before switching.
Trade-off: Its listed price is per user; confirm the total for your team.
6.5/10from
$95/mo - ATS + CRM teams
LeverLeverLever is worth evaluating if your priority is combining an ATS with recruiting CRM and building passive-candidate pipelines. The comparison also lists hiring analytics and AI, but does not publish a price. That makes it a feature-fit conversation first: ask for a quote and confirm which capabilities and limits apply before comparing its cost with Bullhorn.
Trade-off: No public price or relevant Reddit feedback is listed.
6.2/10from
Custom - Recruiting tool consolidation
GemGemGem may suit teams trying to replace several recruiting tools while keeping their current ATS, rather than moving every system into a new platform. The comparison highlights broad recruiting coverage and lists a free plan, with paid pricing from $130. Ask which functions that price covers and what custom pricing applies to your setup.
Trade-off: Custom pricing is opaque, so the starting price may not settle the budget.
7.0/10from
$130/mofree plan - Analytics-led consolidation
AshbyAshbyAshby is an option if your main reason to move is consolidating recruiting tools and adding built-in recruiting analytics. The comparison lists it from $360, while also noting limits on its $400/month entry plan and unpublished prices for larger plans. Confirm the applicable plan price and limits before treating it as a like-for-like Bullhorn replacement.
Trade-off: Entry-plan limits and larger-plan pricing need clarification.
6.0/10from
$360/mo - Hiring automation
ParadoxParadoxParadox fits buyers focused on automating hiring tasks across multiple stages while keeping an existing system of record. That makes it a different kind of switch from replacing Bullhorn with another all-in-one ATS and CRM. The comparison does not publish pricing or limits, so ask what the automation covers and what the implementation would cost.
Trade-off: Pricing and limits are not published in the comparison.
6.2/10from
Custom - LinkedIn sourcing
LinkedIn RecruiterLinkedIn RecruiterLinkedIn Recruiter is a better fit if the gap you are trying to address is sourcing on LinkedIn, not replacing every Bullhorn workflow. The comparison lists ATS integration and a starting price of $140, and also identifies Recruiter Lite for small teams. Check the quote and integration requirements before deciding whether it complements or replaces your current setup.
Trade-off: It is a sourcing-focused option, not a listed ATS-and-CRM bundle.
6.3/10from
$140/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bullhorn Bullhorn (current) | 7.2 | $99/mo | No | Staffing firms consolidating ATS and CRM |
| CATS CATS | 6.5 | $95/mo | No | Recruiters needing ATS and CRM together |
| Lever Lever | 6.2 | Custom | No | Teams combining ATS and recruiting CRM |
| Gem Gem | 7.0 | $130/mo | Yes | Startups with 1–10 FTE |
| Ashby Ashby | 6.0 | $360/mo | No | Teams consolidating recruiting tools |
| Paradox Paradox | 6.2 | Custom | No | Organizations automating hiring tasks |
| LinkedIn Recruiter LinkedIn Recruiter | 6.3 | $140/mo | No | Recruiters sourcing on LinkedIn |
Questions people ask
How much does Bullhorn cost?
Our comparison lists Bullhorn from $99. It does not specify which plan that starting price applies to. It also advises getting a quote before budgeting for AI or front-to-back operations, so ask Bullhorn for the costs and limits that match your required setup.
Which Bullhorn alternatives combine ATS and CRM?
CATS is described as an ATS and recruiting CRM, with candidate-stage workflow automation and client and applicant tracking. Lever is also described as combining ATS and recruiting CRM, with passive-candidate pipelines. Their pricing differs: CATS is listed from $95 per user, while Lever’s price is not published.
Can these alternatives replace all of Bullhorn?
Our comparison does not establish that any one alternative replaces all Bullhorn functions, including front-to-back operations. CATS and Lever are listed for ATS and CRM needs; Paradox is framed around automation alongside an existing system of record. Map your required workflows, then confirm coverage and pricing with each vendor.