We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
The best Bitbucket alternative depends on what you’re trying to leave behind. Gitea and Forgejo fit teams ready to self-host Git; Gerrit focuses on code review, while Graphite is for GitHub teams changing their pull request workflow. Reddit discussions point to runner costs, integration choices and hosting control as reasons teams reconsider Bitbucket. But switching has a cost too: tools like Graphite and Review Board are not one-for-one replacements for a code host.
01Why people leave Bitbucket
Pipeline costs
A Reddit thread’s title reports a $15/month charge per self-hosted runner; it raises cost concerns, though the post details are limited.
Different integrations
A Reddit commenter says their workplace moved to GitHub for its Linear integration; other commenters value the Jira and Confluence connection.
Hosting control
A Reddit commenter describes using local GitLab installs for client security requirements, with staff maintaining the servers.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Self-hosted Git
GiteaGitea
Gitea is the clearest fit if you want to leave Bitbucket’s hosted setup and manage Git hosting yourself. The listing highlights private repositories for small groups and GitHub Actions-compatible workflows. It has a free plan and starts at $9.50, according to the published pricing summary.
Trade-off: You’ll need to manage self-hosting; weigh paid plans against Forgejo’s community appeal.
7.5/10from
$9.50/mofree plan - Free software forge
ForgejoForgejoForgejo fits teams leaving Bitbucket because they want to self-host Git and prioritize Free Software. It is listed with a free plan and no published starting price. Choose it if server management is acceptable and control matters more than keeping your current hosted workflow unchanged.
Trade-off: Self-hosting means your team handles server management.
7.6/10from
Freefree plan - Configurable code review
Gerrit Code ReviewGerrit Code ReviewGerrit is worth considering if configurable approvals and patchset reviews are the main reason you’re looking beyond Bitbucket. It is an open-source code review system with no license fee listed. It is a focused review option, not a direct replacement for every code-hosting workflow.
Trade-off: Its patchset-review workflow may not fit your team.
6.8/10from
Freefree plan - Code and project tools
GiteeGiteeGitee combines code hosting and project workflows, making it an option if you want those functions together rather than keeping Bitbucket as your code host. The listing includes a free plan and private deployment as a consideration; its starting price is $24.92.
Trade-off: Check its limits and trust trade-offs before switching.
6.8/10from
CN¥24.92/mofree plan - Stacked pull requests
GraphiteGraphiteGraphite is for teams changing their pull request workflow, especially those adopting stacked pull requests or needing a merge queue. Its listing positions it for GitHub teams and AI review workflows, so it is not a direct Bitbucket code-hosting substitute. Monthly prices are unpublished.
Trade-off: Its listed fit is for GitHub teams, and free AI features are limited.
6.5/10from
$20/mofree plan - Mixed-media review
Review BoardReview BoardReview Board suits teams that want to review code and documents, including projects needing image-diff workflows. It also offers an on-prem deployment option, which may matter if hosting control is part of your reason for leaving. Treat it as a review-focused alternative, not an assumed replacement for Bitbucket hosting.
Trade-off: Check integration caps and unpublished seat limits.
6.7/10from
$12/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bitbucket Bitbucket (current) | 7.0 | $3.65/mo | Yes | Teams already using Jira |
| Gitea Gitea | 7.5 | $9.50/mo | Yes | Teams comfortable self-hosting Git |
| Forgejo Forgejo | 7.6 | Free | Yes | Teams that want to self-host Git |
| Gerrit Code Review Gerrit Code Review | 6.8 | Free | Yes | Teams wanting open-source code review |
| Gitee Gitee | 6.8 | CN¥24.92/mo | Yes | Small teams wanting a free code-hosting plan |
| Graphite Graphite | 6.5 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams adopting stacked pull requests |
| Review Board Review Board | 6.7 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams reviewing code and documents |
Questions people ask
Does Bitbucket have an equivalent to GitHub Actions?
The published material identifies Bitbucket Pipelines as its CI/CD option, but does not establish feature parity with GitHub Actions. Gitea is listed as supporting GitHub Actions-compatible workflows. Compare the specific workflow features and costs you need before switching.
Do people still use GitLab?
The Reddit material includes a commenter whose employer uses local GitLab installs for client security requirements, and a discussion comparing GitLab with Bitbucket and GitHub. That shows it is still in use, but these threads do not establish how common it is.
Does Bitbucket have issues?
The published material confirms Bitbucket’s fit with Jira and mentions Jira issue links and status appearing in Atlassian workflows. It does not describe Bitbucket’s own issue-tracking features, so we can’t confirm their scope from these sources. Check the current product documentation before switching.