We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Bitbucket.
Pick Bitbucket if your team already works in Jira and wants code hosting, CI/CD, and merge controls in one platform. Its free plan covers up to five users; Standard is $3.65 per user monthly. Free includes 50 build minutes; 1,000 extra minutes or 100 GB of LFS storage costs $10 monthly. Choose Review Board for code, document, and image reviews, or an on-prem option. RBCommons starts at $6 per user monthly; seat limits are not published.
01Side by side
| Bitbucket | Review Board | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free; Standard is $3.65 per user/month. | Free on-prem; RBCommons Basic is $6/user/month. |
| Free plan | Free for up to five users; includes 50 build minutes. | Free Community on-prem; seat and usage limits unpublished. |
| Best for | Teams connecting source code and CI/CD with Jira. | Teams reviewing code, documents, and images. |
| Core strength | Jira-connected code hosting, pipelines, and merge controls. | Code, document, and image reviews; on-prem deployment. |
| Learning curve | Not published on the vendor's site. | Not published on the vendor's site. |
| Integrations and deployment | Jira connection; hosted or private pipeline runners. | On-prem or hosted; SaaS plans cap integrations at 2 or 50. |
| Team and seat costs | Free to five users; paid per user; add-ons cost $10/month. | Per-user pricing; seat limits unpublished across plans. |
| Support | Our review score: 5/10. | Our review score: 5/10. |
Bitbucket Choose Bitbucket if
- Choose Bitbucket if Jira is central to your development workflow.
- Choose Bitbucket if you need hosted or private CI/CD runners.
- Choose Bitbucket if a five-user free plan fits your team.
Review Board Choose Review Board if
- Choose Review Board if reviewers need document and image diffs.
- Choose Review Board if you need an on-prem deployment option.
- Choose Review Board if code-review workflows need issue tracking.
02Pricing compared
Bitbucket’s Free plan costs $0 for up to five users and includes unlimited public and private repositories, 1 GB of LFS storage, and 50 build minutes. Standard is $3.65 per user per month; Premium is $8. Extra build minutes or LFS storage costs $10 per month for either 1,000 minutes or 100 GB. The pricing page does not list annual rates.
Review Board’s RBCommons SaaS Basic plan is $6 per user per month, with up to two integrations; Business is $12 with up to 50. Both include a 30-day trial, but seat limits and annual SaaS pricing are not published. On-prem Community is free; Plus costs $12 per user monthly with annual billing or $15 monthly, while Enterprise is $15 annually billed or $18 monthly. Seat and usage limits are not published for the on-prem plans.
03Features and depth
Bitbucket combines source-code hosting, code review, and CI/CD. Its feature set includes Jira work-item connections, hosted or private pipeline runners, customizable merge checks, and permissions at workspace, project, repository, branch, environment, and package levels. The product also lists AI-powered search, code review, and pipeline triage. Premium adds enforced merge checks, IP allowlisting, deployment permissions, and required two-step verification.
Review Board is narrower in purpose: it handles review and approval for code, documents, and images. Reviewers can comment on code changes, compare document revisions, and use split, color, onion-skin, or side-by-side image diffs. Reviews also support opening, resolving, and reopening issues, while a dashboard tracks review requests and project activity. Command-line tools can post and land changes, create aliases, and check review status. It offers on-premises, Docker, cloud, and managed hosting options. Choose by workflow: Bitbucket bundles code hosting and pipelines; Review Board covers mixed-media review.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The easier fit depends on what your team already uses. If your work is organized around Jira, Bitbucket connects code and CI/CD workflows to Jira items, and its permissions and merge checks sit alongside those workflows. Teams adopting it for code review alone may also be taking on a broader code-hosting and pipeline platform.
Review Board’s focus is reviews, with on-premises, Docker, cloud, and managed hosting choices. Those options provide deployment flexibility, but the published pricing information does not spell out setup requirements or administration effort. Nor are Review Board seat limits published. Before switching, check which hosting model you need and confirm the applicable user and integration limits; the SaaS plans list integration caps, not seat caps.
Questions people ask
How do you check a pull request in Bitbucket?
Bitbucket includes code review and customizable merge checks, according to its feature information. The published material does not provide click-by-click instructions for opening or reviewing a pull request, so check Bitbucket’s current documentation for the exact steps in your workspace.
Is Bitbucket better than GitHub?
The information here covers Bitbucket, not GitHub, so it is not enough to judge which is better. Bitbucket’s listed strengths include Jira connections, CI/CD pipelines, and merge controls. Compare those against the GitHub plan, limits, and integrations your team would actually use before switching.
Do people still use GitLab?
The published sources do not include current GitLab usage figures or user sentiment, so we can’t verify how widely it is used. This comparison covers Bitbucket and Review Board only; it does not establish whether GitLab is a better alternative for your team.
Is Bitbucket free or paid?
Both. Bitbucket’s Free plan costs $0 and supports up to five users, with unlimited public and private repositories, 1 GB of LFS storage, and 50 build minutes. Paid plans are Standard at $3.65 and Premium at $8 per user per month, according to the published pricing information.