We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Bardeen starts at $10 and has a free plan, but its entry plan lists 100 credits, so check expected workflow volume before switching or scaling. For broad app connectivity, compare Zapier; for code-friendly workflows, Make or n8n; for API-heavy builds, Pipedream. None of the published alternatives is specifically described as a lead-research scraper, so confirm your exact enrichment, extraction and export steps before moving.
01Why people leave Bardeen
Check the 100-credit entry allowance
Bardeen’s entry plan is listed with 100 credits. Confirm the allowance fits your lead research, enrichment and export workload.
Need broader app coverage
Zapier emphasizes wide integration coverage. Compare the apps your workflows require before choosing a replacement.
Want more technical control
n8n supports self-hosting and audited, re-runnable steps; Make lists custom JavaScript or Python. Check whether either fits your team.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Broad app coverage
ZapierZapierSwitch to Zapier if your lead workflow depends on connecting many apps and you want a non-technical workflow builder. Its listing emphasizes wide app coverage and simple workflows, plus centralized IT governance for enterprises. It starts at $19.99 with a free plan, above Bardeen’s $10 starting price; task-based pricing can rise quickly, according to Reddit users.
Trade-off: Task-based pricing can get expensive as workflow volume grows.
6.7/10from
$19.99/mofree plan - Custom workflow logic
MakeMakeMake is a fit if you want technical users to add custom JavaScript or Python to workflows, or need governance and role-based access. The listing also positions it for companies building AI agents across apps. It starts at $12 with a free plan, close to Bardeen’s $10 entry price, but its credit-metered pricing may be less forgiving for light use.
Trade-off: Credit metering may be a poor fit for light or budget use.
7.0/10from
$12/mofree plan - Self-hosted automation
n8nn8nConsider n8n if developers on your team can manage self-hosted infrastructure or you need audited, re-runnable workflow steps. It is also positioned for mixing deterministic steps with AI calls. The listed starting price is $20 with a free plan. The tradeoff: cloud execution caps are described as tight for the price.
Trade-off: Cloud execution caps are tight for the price.
7.2/10from
$20/mofree plan - API-heavy workflows
PipedreamPipedreamPipedream is worth comparing when your replacement needs production integrations across many APIs, managed OAuth or AI-agent workflows. Those are the use cases in its listing, making it a more developer-focused option than a general lead-workflow pitch. It starts at $99 with a free plan, so budget carefully for production users, usage and free-tier limits.
Trade-off: The $99 starting price and usage limits need careful budgeting.
7.0/10from
$99/mofree plan - Microsoft workflows
Power AutomatePower AutomateChoose Power Automate if the workflows you want to move are tied to Microsoft 365, HR onboarding, approvals or attended desktop RPA. Its listed starting price is $15, with no free plan specified. The fit is strongest for Microsoft-centric teams; the published description warns that bot and mining plans limit its value for broader automation.
Trade-off: Bot and mining plans can limit broader value.
6.5/10from
$15/mo - Simple app connections
IFTTTIFTTTIFTTT is the lower-cost option here for simple app-to-app automations or smart-home service connections. It has a free plan and starts at $2.09, below Bardeen’s $10 starting price. The listing calls it approachable, but says credit limits and polling speeds may not suit every workflow, so check those against your needs.
Trade-off: Credit limits and polling speeds may not fit your workflows.
6.8/10from
$2.09/mofree plan
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Bardeen Bardeen (current) | 6.2 | $10/mo | Yes | Teams automating lead research |
| Zapier Zapier | 6.7 | $19.99/mo | Yes | Teams needing the widest app coverage |
| Make Make | 7.0 | $12/mo | Yes | Teams needing governance and role-based access |
| n8n n8n | 7.2 | $20/mo | Yes | Teams mixing deterministic steps with AI calls |
| Pipedream Pipedream | 7.0 | $99/mo | Yes | Teams building AI agents |
| Power Automate Power Automate | 6.5 | $15/mo | No | Microsoft 365 workflow automation |
| IFTTT IFTTT | 6.8 | $2.09/mo | Yes | Simple app-to-app automations |
Questions people ask
Which Bardeen alternative has the lowest listed starting price?
Among the listed paid starting prices, IFTTT is lowest at $2.09 and also has a free plan. Bardeen starts at $10 and has a free plan. Those figures do not establish which free tier supports more of your workflow; check the relevant limits before switching.
Is Zapier cheaper than Bardeen?
Zapier’s listed starting price is $19.99, compared with Bardeen’s $10, and both have free plans. Zapier’s pricing is task-based, and Reddit users report that costs can rise quickly. Compare the paid plan and task volume you expect rather than relying on the starting price alone.
Which alternative is best for lead scraping?
The published descriptions do not specifically identify any of these alternatives as a lead-research scraper. Make lists custom JavaScript or Python, while n8n is positioned for technical workflow control. Before moving, verify that the exact scraping, enrichment and data-export steps you rely on are supported.