We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
If Applitools’ $667 starting price is hard to justify, Chromatic is the closest fit here for visual UI reviews. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs suit teams that need broader browser and device testing; Browserling is a lower-entry option for occasional browser checks. The Reddit discussion raises cost as a factor for smaller teams, but it does not document specific cancellations or technical complaints. Pick based on what you need to replace: visual comparisons, device coverage, or a wider QA workflow.
01Why people leave Applitools
The entry price may strain smaller teams
Applitools is listed from $667. In a Reddit discussion about AI testing tools, a commenter says cost can be a factor for smaller teams.
Costs beyond Starter are unclear
The available Applitools listing gives a starting price but no higher-tier prices or plan caps, making budget comparisons difficult.
Value depends on testing needs
A Reddit commenter says these tools can help with frequent UI changes or quick test creation, but may suit larger, complex workflows best.
02The alternatives, ranked by fit
- Visual UI reviews
ChromaticChromaticChromatic is the closest alternative on this list if your main reason for using Applitools is checking UI changes visually. Its listing describes browser-based visual checks and collaboration for component-driven teams, with a free plan and a $179 starting price. That gives you a more focused option to compare before paying Applitools’ listed $667 entry price.
Trade-off: Snapshot costs can grow as testing expands; its fit is strongest for component-driven teams.
7.5/10from
$179/mofree plan - Real device coverage
BrowserStackBrowserStackSwitch to BrowserStack if your priority is testing across real devices rather than visual comparison alone. Its listing covers web and mobile QA, manual and automated testing, and wide device coverage, with a $29 starting price. It is a better fit when device breadth is the gap Applitools does not address for your team.
Trade-off: The listing warns that costs can rise quickly; visual comparison is not its stated focus.
7.6/10from
$29/mo - Browser and device QA
Sauce LabsSauce LabsSauce Labs is worth comparing if you need a broader browser and device testing suite, including real-device testing and beta app distribution. The listing gives a $39 starting price for manual testing, while noting that automation plans cost more. That distinction matters if you are replacing Applitools to reduce spend but still need automation.
Trade-off: The $39 entry price is for manual testing; automation plans are pricier.
6.7/10from
$39/mo - Occasional browser checks
BrowserlingBrowserlingBrowserling suits teams that need cross-browser checks on real browsers but do not need a broad testing platform. Its listing starts at $9 and includes a free plan, making it a lower-cost option to evaluate for occasional browser coverage. Consider it when the Applitools bill feels difficult to justify for a narrower browser-checking need.
Trade-off: The free tier is limited, and broader browser coverage costs more.
7.0/10from
$9/mofree plan - Browser-based mobile testing
AppetizeAppetizeAppetize is a more relevant switch if your work centers on sharing mobile builds in a browser or testing across changing device configurations. Its listing includes a free plan and a $59 starting price, and also names AI agents running mobile workflows as a use case. It is a mobile-focused alternative, not a like-for-like visual testing replacement.
Trade-off: Watch the minutes, device caps and annual commitment.
7.2/10from
$59/mofree plan - Jira test management
XrayXrayXray makes sense if Jira is already central to your QA process and you want test traceability or to automate tests from Jira. Its listed starting price is $8.33, well below Applitools’ $667 entry price. This is a workflow change rather than a direct visual-testing substitute, so compare it only if Jira-based test management is the need.
Trade-off: It is not presented as a visual-testing replacement; check costs carefully.
6.0/10from
$8.33/mo
03Side by side
| Tool | Score | From | Free plan | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Applitools Applitools (current) | 7.1 | $667/mo | No | Teams with frequent UI changes |
| Chromatic Chromatic | 7.5 | $179/mo | Yes | Teams reviewing UI changes together |
| BrowserStack BrowserStack | 7.6 | $29/mo | No | Teams testing across real devices |
| Sauce Labs Sauce Labs | 6.7 | $39/mo | No | Teams testing across browsers and devices |
| Browserling Browserling | 7.0 | $9/mo | Yes | Cross-browser checks on real browsers |
| Appetize Appetize | 7.2 | $59/mo | Yes | Teams sharing mobile builds in a browser |
| Xray Xray | 6.0 | $8.33/mo | No | Teams already working in Jira |
Questions people ask
What is the closest Applitools alternative for visual UI checks?
Chromatic is the closest fit among these options because its listing specifically includes browser-based visual checks and UI-change reviews. It has a free plan and starts at $179. Its stated fit is component-driven teams, so it may not suit every visual-testing workflow.
Is there a lower-priced alternative to Applitools?
The alternatives listed here start at lower published prices: Browserling at $9, BrowserStack at $29, Sauce Labs at $39, Appetize at $59, Xray at $8.33, and Chromatic at $179. Those are not identical products or necessarily comparable plans, so check which features and caps apply.
Should a small team switch from Applitools?
It depends on how often your UI changes and what work the tool replaces. A Reddit commenter says cost can matter for smaller teams, while frequent UI changes and quick test creation can still make AI testing tools useful. Compare the entry price and plan limits against your actual QA needs.