Trint review

Trint is an AI transcription and content workflow tool for audio and video. It can transcribe live audio or let you upload multiple prerecorded files, then gives teams a searchable transcript with time codes and automatic speaker recognition. Trint lists transcription in more than 50 languages and transcript translation in more than 70.

The product goes beyond turning speech into text. Its AI features can surface key moments and generate summaries, while Story Builder supports rough cuts, captions, and article drafts. That makes Trint relevant to teams that need to review and reshape recorded material, not just export a transcript. In one r/editors thread, a user described searching transcript text to jump to a specific point in a clip; other editors noted that similar transcript-search functions are available in tools such as Premiere and Avid.

Trint’s main advantage is the workflow around the transcript: searchable, time-coded text can help editors find and organize moments without scrubbing through an entire recording. Speaker recognition, shared drives, and real-time editing also give teams more to work with than a plain transcript file. Reddit users describe using Trint for interview transcription and paper cuts, though those reports are individual experiences, not a guarantee of accuracy or time saved.

The listed plans give buyers a clear route from an individual seat to a small team:

• Pro costs $100 per seat per month, or $79 per seat per month with annual billing. It includes one user, unlimited transcription under fair use, and one hour of live transcription per month.
• Team costs $90 per seat per month, or $69 with annual billing, for teams of two to five. It includes shared drives, real-time editing, and one hour of live transcription per seat per month.

Both plans list transcription in 50+ languages; Pro also lists translation in 70+ languages. There’s a seven-day trial, but no free plan.

The price is hard to justify if you only need transcripts. The lowest listed rate is Team at $69 per seat per month with annual billing, and that plan is for two to five members; Pro is $79 per seat per month annually for one user. Monthly billing is higher: $90 for Team and $100 for Pro. These prices buy workflow features as well as transcription, so a single-purpose use case may not need the full package.

“Unlimited transcription” on Pro and Team is qualified by fair use, but the pricing information does not define that limit or publish overage costs. Live transcription is capped at one hour per month on Pro and one hour per seat per month on Team. Business pricing is custom, and bulk, archival, or continuous live transcription requires a custom agreement. Add-on prices are not published.

Accuracy may also need human cleanup. Reddit users report mixed results: one user found specialist vocabulary costly to correct, while another said Trint had improved but still struggled more with strong accents.

Trint has no free plan; the listed trial is seven days. Pro costs $100 per seat per month on monthly billing, or $79 per seat per month with annual billing. It includes one seat, unlimited transcription under fair use, and one hour of live transcription per month.

Team is $90 per seat per month monthly, or $69 with annual billing, for 2–5 people. That is a lower per-seat rate than Pro, but you must buy at least two seats. Team includes one hour of live transcription per seat per month. Both plans cover transcription in 50+ languages; translation in 70+ languages is listed for Pro.

“Unlimited” transcription is qualified by fair use on Pro and Team, but the pricing information gives no numerical cap. Business pricing is custom. Bulk, archival, or continuous live transcription requires a custom agreement. Public add-on prices and overage costs are not published, so get those terms in writing before committing. Annual rates are lower, but the billing information does not state the total amount charged upfront.

Moving into Trint may be straightforward for teams starting with audio and video files: the product supports multiple-file uploads, transcription, translation, and shared editing. But the published information does not spell out migration tools or supported import formats. For an existing archive, ask how bulk or archival processing is priced; Trint says those needs require a custom agreement on Business.

Before moving work out, confirm which transcript and content formats you can export, and whether exports retain speaker recognition, time codes, translations, captions, and edits. Those export details are not published in the material we have, so portability is a question to settle before building a workflow around Story Builder.

We can’t responsibly summarize why people leave Trint based on Reddit: no Reddit posts or comments were included in the published material. Treat export support, archive costs, and any usage limits beyond fair use as vendor questions—not established user complaints.