Torch review

Torch is a leadership coaching platform for organizations. It matches leaders with coaches based on role level, then offers coaching in three formats: individual, team and group. The homepage describes the aim as supporting performance, culture and organizational change.

The product is organized around three leadership tiers: Executive, Core and Emerging. The published information says they are intended for different leadership levels, but does not spell out the eligibility criteria or what changes between tiers. Torch also shares research on reported changes in managers’ behavior, skills and work experience.

That makes Torch a coaching program platform, not a simple directory of coaches: its pitch is matching, delivery across formats and research on outcomes. For a buyer, the key questions are whether its tiers fit the organization’s leadership structure and whether its coaching formats match the needs of individuals and teams.

Torch covers more than one coaching use case. Individual coaching is aimed at leaders one to one; team coaching is positioned to support culture and execution; and group coaching gives organizations another format to consider. That range may make it easier to align coaching with different leadership needs without treating every participant as an individual-coaching case.

The level-based matching and three named tiers also give buyers a clear starting point for thinking about who the program is for. Torch says it matches coaches to leaders based on role level and responsibilities, and offers Executive, Core and Emerging tiers for different leadership levels.

• Individual: one-to-one coaching for leaders at scale.
• Team: coaching for culture and execution.
• Group: a group format within the organization’s coaching program.

Torch also shares outcome research covering reported changes in managers’ behavior, skills and work experience. That gives buyers something beyond a list of coaching formats to examine. The published information does not include study details or results, though, so treat the research as a place to ask for evidence, not proof of a particular outcome.

The buying case is hard to price from the information available. The pricing data, checked November 7, 2026 and marked low confidence, lists only “Enterprise / custom,” with no monthly or annual price and no published billing terms. It also does not specify what an engagement includes. That leaves buyers unable to compare Torch’s cost with another coaching provider from the published figures.

The same information gives no seat, session, team-size or coaching-hours caps. Those limits are not published on the vendor's site, so organizations should ask for them before comparing proposals. The pricing record lists no free plan and does not state whether a free trial is available; trial terms are not published.

There are also gaps in the tier and outcome detail. The published information names Executive, Core and Emerging but does not define their criteria or differences. Torch shares outcome research, but no figures or methodology are provided here. Buyers should request tier definitions, research details and a written scope with the quote before treating the program as a settled fit.

Torch’s enterprise pricing is custom, and the price is not published. The available pricing information gives no monthly or annual rate, billing unit, or add-on prices, so we can’t calculate a per-leader cost or compare the total with another coaching platform. Ask Torch for a written quote that spells out the billing basis and any minimum commitment; those terms are not published either.

The Executive, Core, and Emerging options are coaching tiers for different leadership levels, not published price tiers. There’s no stated price jump between them. The published pricing record lists no add-ons, which is not the same as confirming that add-ons are unavailable. It also lists no free plan; trial terms are not published. Monthly and annual billing terms are not published, so buyers can’t assess a billing discount or cancellation window from the available information. Torch offers individual, team, and group coaching, but the pricing information does not show whether those formats change the quote. The buying case stays uncertain until Torch provides a detailed proposal.

Torch’s public information describes coach matching and individual, team, and group coaching, but the published sources don’t explain how to migrate an existing coaching program, transfer participant records, or export data. Treat those as contract questions, not assumed capabilities. Before signing, ask what information Torch needs to match leaders to coaches, what data it will retain, and what you can take with you if the engagement ends.

Switching away may also mean replacing the coaching formats and leadership tiers your organization uses; Torch lists Executive, Core, and Emerging tiers, but the source does not document a transition process. We found no Reddit posts or comments in the published material, so we can’t substantiate reasons users leave or claims about export problems. For either direction, get the migration steps, data handling terms, and exit obligations in writing. With custom enterprise pricing and unpublished billing terms, make the renewal and termination terms part of the same conversation as the quote.