We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Slack for team conversations, channels, huddles and connected apps: its Pro plan starts at $7.25 per user monthly with annual billing. Choose Teamwork.com for client-project delivery, resourcing, time tracking and profitability reporting; Basics starts at $9.99 per user monthly annually and requires at least three users. Both offer free plans, but Slack limits history and apps, while Teamwork.com limits users, projects and storage. These tools serve different jobs, so the better pick depends on whether you need communication or project operations.
01Side by side
| Slack | Teamwork.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $7.25/user/month, billed annually | $9.99/user/month, billed annually |
| Free plan | 90-day history, 10 apps, one-to-one huddles | 5 users, 5 projects, 100MB storage |
| Best for | Team communication and connected apps | Client projects and professional services operations |
| Core strength | Channels, huddles, AI search and workflows | Resourcing, time tracking and project profitability |
| Learning curve | Ease-of-use score: 7 | Ease-of-use score: 7 |
| Integrations and data | Paid plans: unlimited integrations; Free: 10 apps | Project costs, margins, time, resources and forecasts |
| Team and seat costs | Per-user pricing; minimum not published | Basics minimum 3 users; Accelerate minimum 5 |
| Support | Review support score: 5 | Review support score: 6 |
Slack Choose Slack if
- Choose Slack if team chat and channels are your main need.
- Choose Slack if you want paid plans with unlimited app integrations.
- Choose Slack if a lower annual starting price matters most.
Teamwork.com Choose Teamwork.com if
- Choose Teamwork.com if you manage client projects and delivery.
- Choose Teamwork.com if you need time tracking and profitability reporting.
- Choose Teamwork.com if resource planning and forecasting matter.
02Pricing compared
Slack’s Pro plan costs $7.25 per user per month with annual billing, or $8.75 month to month, according to its pricing page. Teamwork.com Basics is $9.99 per user per month annually, or $13.99 monthly, and requires at least three users. That makes its minimum annual-billing price $29.97 per month for three seats.
Both have free plans. Slack Free includes 90 days of message history and up to 10 apps. Teamwork.com Free allows up to five users and five projects, with 100MB of storage. Teamwork.com also offers a 14-day trial. Its Optimize and Enterprise prices require a custom quote; Slack Enterprise+ lists an annual rate of $45 per user per month.
03Features and depth
Slack is built around team communication: channels, direct messages, huddles, Slack Connect for conversations with clients and vendors, and workflows for tasks such as approvals. Its AI tools include search across company files and conversations, meeting notes for huddles, and Slackbot. The pricing details list basic AI on Free and Pro, and advanced AI on Business+.
Teamwork.com focuses on client-project operations rather than workplace chat. It combines project tasks and tickets with resource planning, time tracking, and reporting on costs, budgets and margins. Its AI agents can draft reports, price work, summarize information and flag risks using delivery data. Plan limits matter: Basics caps projects at 300 and automations at 5,000 per month; Accelerate raises those caps to 600 projects and 20,000 automations. Slack is the closer fit for conversation and connected apps; Teamwork.com is the more specialized option for tracking project delivery and profitability.
04Ease of use and learning curve
The published reviews give both products a 7/10 ease-of-use score, so there is no clear winner on that measure. The practical learning curve depends on the job: Slack centers on channels, messages and huddles, while Teamwork.com adds project, resource, time and profitability workflows.
If your team mainly needs a place to coordinate conversations, Slack’s scope is narrower. If you need to plan capacity, log hours and track project margins, Teamwork.com covers more operational ground, but its paid Basics plan starts at three users. We’d choose based on which workflow people need to keep current, not on the ease score alone.
Questions people ask
Is Slack comparable to Teams?
If you mean Microsoft Teams, the published information does not support a feature-by-feature comparison. Slack is a team communication and work platform with channels, huddles and connected apps. Teamwork.com serves a different purpose: managing client projects, resources, time and profitability.
Does anyone use Slack anymore?
The published material does not include adoption or usage data, so we can’t confirm how many people use Slack. It does describe Slack as a team communication platform with channels, huddles, external messaging and app integrations. Its free plan includes 90 days of message history and up to 10 apps.
Is Slack worth it?
Slack may fit teams that need channels, huddles and connected apps. Pro costs $7.25 per user monthly with annual billing, but Slack Free limits message history to 90 days and apps to 10. Whether the paid plan is worth it depends on whether those limits block your team’s work.
Which is better for teams: Google Chat, Teams or Slack?
We can’t rank Google Chat or Microsoft Teams against Slack from the published information. Slack’s listed strengths are channels, huddles, connected apps and workflows. If by “teams” you mean Teamwork.com, it is aimed at client-project delivery and profitability, not primarily team chat.