We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Pick Responsive if you want a public entry price and a platform spanning RFPs, security questionnaires, and buyer questions. Its Emerging Edition is listed at $10,000 annually ($833.33 per month equivalent), but user licenses and add-ons are not published. Pick Loopio if importing questions, filling documents and web portals, and managing a shared proposal library matter more. Loopio’s plans include a 10-seat Foundations tier, but all pricing is quote-based. Neither product lists a free plan.
01Side by side
| Responsive | Loopio | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $10,000/year; $833.33 monthly equivalent | Quote-based; monthly and annual prices unpublished |
| Free plan | No free plan listed | No free plan listed |
| Best for | RFPs, questionnaires, and buyer-question workflows | RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires |
| Core strength | AI drafts, collaborative workflows, and Q&A library | Question imports, answer automation, and shared library |
| Learning curve | Review ease-of-use score: 7/10 | Review ease-of-use score: 7/10 |
| Integrations & data | Advanced integrations on Growth; names unpublished | Imports questions; supports documents and web portals |
| Team/seat costs | User-license costs unpublished | Foundations: 10 seats; other caps unpublished |
| Support | Support included on Emerging; other details unpublished | Support details not published |
Responsive Choose Responsive if
- Choose Responsive if you need a published starting price.
- Choose Responsive if buyer questions sit alongside RFPs.
- Choose Responsive if Emerging’s included support matters.
Loopio Choose Loopio if
- Choose Loopio if you need question imports and portal autofill.
- Choose Loopio if Foundations’ 10-seat tier fits.
- Choose Loopio if quote-based pricing is acceptable.
02Pricing compared
Responsive has the clearer entry price. Its pricing page lists the Emerging Edition at $10,000 per year, or $833.33 per month equivalent; monthly billing is not published. That tier includes unlimited response projects, AI and automation, content and collaboration, integrations, access control, reporting, and support. User-license, add-on, and services costs are not published, so $10,000 may not be the full cost for your team.
Loopio publishes no monthly or annual prices. Foundations includes 10 seats, unlimited projects and library entries, and 10 customizable themes; Enhanced and Enterprise are also quote-based. That leaves no public price to compare with Responsive’s entry point. Neither product lists a free plan, and neither lists a free trial.
03Features and depth
Both products combine response content with AI assistance and team workflows, but their listed coverage differs. Responsive is positioned for RFPs and other RFXs, security questionnaires and assessments, and buyer questions. It drafts answers from company content and subject-matter expertise, with collaborative response projects and a maintained Q&A library. Its listed Emerging features include unlimited response projects and content, while Growth adds intake requests, LookUp, eSignature, and advanced integrations. Enterprise adds flexible custom AI and enterprise controls.
Loopio focuses on RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires. Its listed tools include a shared content library, question importing, AI-assisted answers, and answer automation for documents and web-based portals. It also provides proposal milestones and readiness insights. Foundations offers 10 customizable themes; Enhanced offers 15, and Enterprise offers 20. The published details do not establish which product drafts more accurate answers, so compare their workflows against your response types and current content.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Neither product publishes setup times, training requirements, or a measured learning curve in the published materials, so we can’t say one is quicker to learn. Both are built around shared response content and collaboration. Responsive describes collaborative response projects and a maintained Q&A library; Loopio lists question import, peer and subject-matter-expert collaboration, and proposal milestones.
For a switch, map your current process before choosing: where questions arrive, who approves answers, and whether teams need to fill web portals as well as documents. Loopio specifically lists document and web-portal answer automation. Responsive lists buyer questions, RFPs, and questionnaires across its response workflow. Confirm migration and onboarding details with each vendor; they are not specified here.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, Responsive or Loopio?
We can’t make a full cost comparison from public prices. Responsive lists Emerging at $10,000 annually, but user-license and add-on costs are not published. Loopio’s plans are quote-based, with no public monthly or annual price.
Do Responsive or Loopio offer a free plan?
Neither product lists a free plan in the published pricing information. A free trial is also not listed for either. Ask each vendor directly about trial access, implementation costs, and any contract terms before comparing quotes.
How many seats are included with each product?
Loopio’s Foundations plan lists 10 seats. Enhanced does not publish a seat limit, while Enterprise offers a custom number. Responsive does not publish user-license costs or a seat count for Emerging, so confirm the included users with the vendor.
Which product supports security questionnaires?
Both do. Responsive lists security questionnaires and assessments alongside RFPs, other RFXs, and buyer questions. Loopio lists security questionnaires alongside RFPs, RFIs, and DDQs, and also describes importing questions and automating answers in documents and web portals.