We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Read AI.
Choose Read AI for meeting transcripts, reports, and shared search: its pricing lists a free plan and Pro at $15 per user/month with annual billing. CoPilot AI is harder to recommend from this information alone. Its description presents Microsoft’s general-purpose assistant and a free tier, while its pricing lists prospecting campaigns starting at $199/month on annual billing. Confirm which product and plan you’re buying before comparing costs.
01Side by side
| Read AI | CoPilot AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0; Pro is $15/user/month annually | Core is $199/month on annual billing |
| Free plan | Free plan: five meeting reports monthly | Pricing says no; description claims a free tier |
| Best for | Meeting transcripts, recaps, and action items | Description: general AI; plans: prospecting |
| Core strength | Meeting search with answers and citations | Web research and content creation, per description |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations/data | Premium integrations; search across meetings and data | Web search and work-file finding described |
| Team/seat costs | Per-user plans; Enterprise+ requires five licenses | Team prices unpublished; Sales Navigator required per user |
| Support | Premium support listed on Enterprise | Support details not published |
Read AI Choose Read AI if
- Choose Read AI if meetings need searchable transcripts and reports.
- Choose Read AI if you want a listed free plan.
- Choose Read AI if you need named integrations like Salesforce or Jira.
CoPilot AI Choose CoPilot AI if
- Choose CoPilot AI if its prospecting plans match your actual product needs.
- Choose CoPilot AI if you need campaign and message limits listed upfront.
- Choose CoPilot AI only after confirming which product its pricing covers.
02Pricing compared
Read AI has the more transparent entry price: its pricing lists a free plan with five meeting reports or transcripts per month, then Pro at $15 per user/month with annual billing ($19.75 monthly). Pro includes unlimited reports and transcripts, a four-hour meeting limit, and 100 file upload credits per month. Enterprise starts at $22.50 per user/month annually and requires five or more licenses for Enterprise+.
CoPilot AI’s listed plans are harder to compare. Core is $199/month and Guided is $299/month on annual billing; monthly prices are not published. Those plans list prospecting quotas, including 600 connection messages and 150 AI-generated replies per month. But the product description instead presents Microsoft’s general-purpose assistant and says a free tier is available. The pricing data says there is no free plan. Confirm the product, billing term, and included service before buying.
03Features and depth
Read AI is the more specific fit if the work starts in meetings. Its feature list covers transcripts, recaps, highlights, live notes, and Ask Read search across meetings, email, and messages, with citations in answers. It also lists shared workspaces, action-item routing, and Ada, a digital twin described as a personal AI assistant. Plan limits matter: free meetings are capped at one hour, while Pro and Enterprise allow up to four hours; Enterprise+ allows eight.
CoPilot AI’s description promises broad chat, web research, summaries, file discovery, writing, and image generation. Those are general-purpose assistant features, but the listed paid plans describe prospecting campaigns, connection messages, nurture messages, and AI-generated replies. That mismatch makes it difficult to judge feature depth for the assistant described. The published pricing information does not confirm whether those prospecting plans include the listed Microsoft-style features.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Read AI has a clear use case: meeting reports, live notes, and search for decisions and action items. Its free plan limits meetings to five reports or transcripts per month and one hour each, so teams can assess that workflow before paying. Our review scores its ease of use 3.5/10 and user sentiment 2/10; it also flags Reddit IT-community concern. Treat that as a reason to check internal approval, not proof of a specific security issue.
CoPilot AI sounds simple to start with as a chat assistant, but the product and pricing descriptions do not line up. The listed prospecting plans also require a LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription for each user, with the cost unpublished. We would confirm the product identity and required setup before judging how easy it is to adopt.
Questions people ask
Is Copilot a good AI assistant?
The published description says Microsoft Copilot can answer questions, summarize information, research the web, find work files, draft content, and generate images. But CoPilot AI’s listed paid plans describe prospecting quotas instead. We would verify which product the offer covers before assessing it as an assistant.
Why is Read AI joining my meeting?
Read AI is described as a meeting assistant that records and summarizes meetings across platforms such as Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. The published information does not explain why it joined a particular call or how to change meeting settings, so check your account and organization’s configuration.
Which AI is best for reading?
If you mean finding and reviewing information from meetings, Read AI is the clearer fit in this comparison: it lists transcripts, summaries, and Ask Read search across meetings, email, and messages. CoPilot AI’s description sounds broader, but its listed plans focus on prospecting.
Are there other apps like Copilot?
This comparison only covers Read AI and CoPilot AI. Read AI is an alternative for meeting notes, reports, and shared search, rather than a confirmed like-for-like replacement for Microsoft’s general-purpose assistant. CoPilot AI’s product and pricing descriptions need clarification before a direct comparison.