We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick ProjectLibre.
Choose ProjectLibre if you want a free, single-user desktop scheduler or lower-priced cloud access: Core is $9.99 per user/month billed annually. Choose TeamGantt if your team wants browser-based Gantt, kanban, and calendar views with live schedule sharing. Its free Personal plan is limited to one user, one project, and 40 tasks; paid Base starts at $49.08/month billed annually, with five projects, one manager, 10 collaborators, and 150 tasks per project. ProjectLibre is the price pick; TeamGantt is the collaboration pick.
01Side by side
| ProjectLibre | TeamGantt | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $0 desktop; Core cloud $9.99/user/month annually | $0 Personal; Base $49.08/month annually |
| Free plan | Single-user local desktop app; free and open source | One user, one project, 40 tasks |
| Best for | Individual scheduling or teams seeking lower-cost cloud access | Browser-based teams wanting Gantt, kanban, and calendar views |
| Core strength | WBS, resource structures, critical path, and earned value | Drag-and-drop Gantt, workload planning, and live sharing |
| Learning curve | Relative learning curve not published | Relative learning curve not published |
| Integrations/data | Integration and data-portability details not published | Integration and data-portability details not published |
| Team/seat costs | Core $9.99/user/month annually; Enterprise/PMO $29.99 | Base $49.08/month annually; 10 collaborators, 150 tasks/project |
| Support | Support terms not published | Support terms not published |
ProjectLibre Choose ProjectLibre if
- Choose ProjectLibre if you need a free, local desktop scheduler.
- Choose ProjectLibre if per-user cloud pricing matters.
- Choose ProjectLibre if you need critical-path, resource, and earned-value tools.
TeamGantt Choose TeamGantt if
- Choose TeamGantt if your team works in browser-based schedules.
- Choose TeamGantt if you want Gantt, kanban, and calendar views.
- Choose TeamGantt if live schedule sharing suits your workflow.
02Pricing compared
ProjectLibre is the lower-cost choice if you can work with its desktop app or pay per seat for cloud access. ProjectLibre Desktop is free and open source. Core is listed at $9.99 per user/month billed annually; Enterprise/PMO Cloud is $29.99 per user/month billed annually. Monthly billing prices are not published, and the Pro plan is marked coming soon.
TeamGantt’s free Personal plan is limited to one user, one project, and 40 tasks. Base costs $49.08/month billed annually or $59 month to month, and includes five projects, one manager, 10 collaborators, and 150 tasks per project. Business is $95/month billed annually or $120 monthly. TeamGantt advertises a 14-day trial and 20% savings with annual billing. ProjectLibre Cloud also lists trials, but the published pricing details do not specify their length.
03Features and depth
ProjectLibre’s feature list covers detailed planning, not just timeline display. Its Gantt tools support dependencies, baselines, and critical-path calculations; it also includes Work Breakdown Structures, resource structures, PERT-style diagrams, and resource assignment for people, equipment, and materials. The cloud version adds real-time co-editing, shared resource pools, and portfolio dashboards. Enterprise/PMO Cloud tools include resource leveling, Monte Carlo risk analysis, schedule audits, and an AI Co-Pilot.
TeamGantt centers on visual scheduling and team coordination. It offers Gantt, kanban, and calendar views, drag-and-drop scheduling, dependencies, workload planning, baselines, progress tracking, and live schedule sharing. Its Builder Edition is aimed at construction teams. Based on the listed features, ProjectLibre offers more explicit costing and scheduling methods, including earned value metrics such as SPI and CPI. TeamGantt’s feature set is more focused on sharing and viewing schedules across a team.
04Ease of use and learning curve
TeamGantt is browser-based and built around drag-and-drop schedules, with kanban and calendar views alongside Gantt charts. That should make it the more straightforward starting point for teams that mainly need to build and share visual timelines; the feature list does not indicate a separate desktop installation.
ProjectLibre offers a free local desktop app, but its planning toolkit includes concepts such as resource breakdowns, critical paths, earned value metrics, and PERT diagrams. Those tools can suit users who need detailed project controls, but they may take longer to learn than a basic schedule workflow. ProjectLibre Cloud adds collaboration, while TeamGantt keeps its listed workflow in the browser. Neither product’s published information gives a formal learning-time estimate.
Questions people ask
Is ProjectLibre free?
ProjectLibre Desktop is listed as free and open source under the CPAL license, for single-user local project management. Cloud access is separate: Core is listed at $9.99 per user/month when billed annually, and Enterprise/PMO Cloud at $29.99 per user/month annually.
Does TeamGantt have a free plan?
Yes. TeamGantt’s Personal plan costs nothing and includes one user, one project, and 40 tasks, plus dependencies and drag-and-drop scheduling. It is a limited individual plan, not a free multi-user team tier. Paid Base starts at $49.08/month with annual billing.
Which is cheaper, ProjectLibre or TeamGantt?
ProjectLibre is cheaper at the entry point: its desktop app is free, and Core cloud access is listed at $9.99 per user/month billed annually. TeamGantt’s free plan has strict limits; its paid Base plan starts at $49.08/month billed annually. The products price cloud access differently, so compare seat and project needs.
Which is better for team collaboration?
TeamGantt is the clearer fit if you want browser-based Gantt, kanban, and calendar views with live schedule sharing. ProjectLibre Cloud also lists real-time co-editing, shared resource pools, and portfolio dashboards. ProjectLibre Desktop is a local, single-user app, so collaboration requires its cloud offering.