We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
Most buyers should pick Notta.
Choose Notta for lower annual Pro and Business prices plus more Pro transcription minutes: 1,800 monthly versus Otter's 1,200. Otter is the better fit if you value its pre-call briefs, live coaching, action items, and CRM sync. Its free plan gives more transcription time (300 versus Notta's 120 minutes monthly), though free recordings cap at 30-minute conversations versus Notta's three-minute limit. For most budget-conscious individual users, we give Notta the edge; teams should compare the workflows they need.
01Side by side
| Notta | Otter.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $8.17/month with annual billing | $8.33/month with annual billing |
| Free plan | Yes; 120 minutes/month, 3-minute recording limit | Yes; 300 minutes/month, 30-minute conversation limit |
| Best for | Searchable notes, summaries, and visual deliverables | Meeting follow-ups, coaching, and CRM workflows |
| Core strength | Search recordings; create presentations and infographics | Briefings, live coaching, and automated action items |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations and search | Notta Brain searches recordings; integrations not specified | Searches connected apps; syncs notes to CRMs |
| Business team pricing | $27.99 monthly; $16.67/month billed annually per user | $30 monthly; $19.99/month billed annually per user |
| Support (review score) | 5 | 4.5 |
Notta Choose Notta if
- Choose Notta if annual price and higher Pro transcription limits matter.
- Choose Notta if you need searchable recordings and visual deliverables.
- Choose Notta if your team wants lower listed Business pricing.
Otter.ai Choose Otter.ai if
- Choose Otter.ai if you want more free transcription minutes.
- Choose Otter.ai if pre-call briefs and live coaching fit your workflow.
- Choose Otter.ai if CRM sync and automated action items matter.
02Pricing compared
Notta costs less on paid plans, especially with annual billing. Its Pro plan is $8.17 per user per month billed annually, or $13.49 month to month; Otter Pro is $8.33 annually or $16.99 monthly, according to the pricing pages. Notta Business is $16.67 per user per month annually, compared with Otter Business at $19.99.
The free-plan trade-off goes the other way: Otter includes 300 transcription minutes per month, while Notta includes 120. But Otter allows only three lifetime file imports and caps conversations at 30 minutes. Notta allows 50 uploads monthly, but each recording is capped at three minutes. Paid users should also note that Notta says standalone minute overages are unavailable, so transcription stops at the plan limit.
03Features and depth
Notta focuses on transcripts, summaries, and finding information in recorded conversations. It lists support for transcription in 58 languages, searchable recordings through Notta Brain, and tools to turn meeting information into presentations and infographics. Its Pro plan includes 1,800 transcription minutes per month, compared with 1,200 on Otter Pro.
Otter’s feature set extends further into meeting follow-up and sales workflows. Its homepage lists pre-call briefs based on prior discussions, live coaching prompts, automatically captured action items, and CRM syncing. Otter AI Chat can search past meetings and connected apps, according to the product description. Those additions may matter more than transcription capacity if a team wants its notetaker to support calls before and after they happen.
The choice is less about which one transcribes and more about what happens next: Notta emphasizes searchable notes and visual deliverables; Otter emphasizes coaching, follow-ups, and CRM workflows. Check plan limits before relying on Otter’s CRM sync.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Our review scores give Notta a slight ease-of-use lead: 7 out of 10 versus 6.5 for Otter. That is a small difference, not proof that one will be easier for every team. Neither product’s published materials publish a learning curve or setup-time measure.
For a straightforward note-taking workflow, Notta’s transcription, summaries, and searchable recordings are the more direct fit. Otter adds pre-call briefs, live coaching, and CRM syncing, which can mean more workflows and plan limits to check before rollout. We’d choose based on the features people will actually use, then confirm the relevant recording, import, and user limits.
Questions people ask
Which is cheaper, Notta or Otter.ai?
Notta is cheaper on the listed paid plans. Annual Pro pricing is $8.17 per user per month for Notta and $8.33 for Otter; annual Business pricing is $16.67 and $19.99, respectively. Monthly billing is also lower for Notta: $13.49 for Pro and $27.99 for Business.
Does Notta or Otter.ai have the better free plan?
Otter offers more transcription time: 300 minutes per month versus Notta’s 120. Notta, however, lists 50 file uploads per month, while Otter Basic includes three lifetime audio or video imports. Their recording caps differ too: 30 minutes per Otter conversation and three minutes per Notta recording.
Which is better for sales teams?
Otter is the more sales-oriented choice in the published feature details: it lists pre-call briefs, live coaching, action items, and CRM syncing. CRM sync has plan limits, though: the pricing details list one user on Pro, five on Business, and unlimited users on Enterprise. Confirm that coverage before choosing.
Does Notta support more languages than Otter.ai?
Notta lists transcription support in 58 languages. Otter’s homepage describes live transcription in multiple languages with speaker recognition, but the published information does not give a language count. If a specific language matters, check its availability with each product before switching.