We may earn a commission if you buy through links on this page. It never changes a score or a ranking. How we make money
It's a split decision.
Choose Miro if your work starts with brainstorming, research, diagrams, roadmaps, or AI-assisted visual collaboration. Its Free plan allows three editable boards; Starter is $8 per member per month billed yearly. Choose TeamGantt when you need schedules built around Gantt charts, dependencies, workload, and progress tracking. Its Personal plan is free but capped at one user, one project, and 40 tasks. Paid Base costs $49.08 per month billed yearly, with five projects and ten collaborators. This is mainly a workflow choice, not a like-for-like price comparison.
01Side by side
| Miro | TeamGantt | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Starter: $8/member/month, billed yearly | Base: $49.08/month, billed yearly |
| Free plan | 3 editable boards; 100 MCP calls daily | 1 user, 1 project, 40 tasks |
| Best for | Visual collaboration, research, and planning | Project schedules and timeline management |
| Core strength | AI-assisted canvas, diagrams, and roadmaps | Gantt schedules, dependencies, and workload |
| Learning curve | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations and data | 250+ integrations; 100 MCP calls daily on Free | Integration count and MCP allowance not published |
| Team and seat costs | Per-member pricing; Starter is $8 per member yearly | Base is $49.08 yearly; 1 manager, 10 collaborators |
| Support | Review score: 5/10 | Review score: 5/10 |
Miro Choose Miro if
- Choose Miro if teams need a shared canvas for research and planning.
- Choose Miro if you want diagrams, roadmaps, and AI-assisted creation.
- Choose Miro if three editable boards are enough to start free.
TeamGantt Choose TeamGantt if
- Choose TeamGantt if Gantt schedules are central to your projects.
- Choose TeamGantt if you need dependencies and workload planning.
- Choose TeamGantt if one free project and 40 tasks cover your needs.
02Pricing compared
Miro is cheaper to start for a team that needs a shared canvas: its Free plan includes three editable boards, and Starter is $8 per member per month with yearly billing. Miro’s monthly-billing prices are not published. Business is $20 per member per month billed yearly.
TeamGantt’s free Personal plan is limited to one user, one project, and 40 tasks. Its Base plan costs $49.08 per month billed yearly, or $59 monthly, and includes five projects and ten collaborators. Business starts at $95 per month billed yearly, with a 20-project limit; extra projects cost $228 per year each. A 14-day free trial is listed.
These prices cover different jobs, so they are not a direct like-for-like comparison. Miro charges per member; TeamGantt’s listed paid plans are priced per month.
03Features and depth
Miro is built for work that starts visually: teams can organize research, plan roadmaps, make diagrams, and collaborate on a shared canvas. Its AI tools can turn prompts, documents, or data into diagrams, timelines, or decks. The Free plan includes 7,000+ templates and 250+ integrations; paid plans add AI credits and higher MCP call limits.
TeamGantt is more focused on scheduling project work. It offers Gantt, kanban, and calendar views, drag-and-drop scheduling, task dependencies, workload planning, baselines, progress tracking, and live schedule sharing. Its paid plans set concrete capacity limits: Base allows 150 tasks per project, while Business allows 500; Builder Edition includes unlimited tasks per project.
Choose based on the work you need to manage. Miro is the closer fit for research synthesis and open-ended planning. TeamGantt is the clearer fit when task dates, dependencies, workloads, and planned-versus-actual progress need to stay visible in a schedule.
04Ease of use and learning curve
Miro’s shared canvas supports several kinds of work, from diagrams to research and roadmaps. That flexibility can suit teams that want to shape a project visually, but the board limit on Free—three editable boards—may matter as work grows. Starter removes the private-board limit, according to the plan details.
TeamGantt’s interface centers on project schedules, with drag-and-drop dates and dependencies that update the plan. That focus is useful when the team already thinks in tasks and timelines; it is less suited to using a canvas as the starting point for research or idea generation. Both products offer collaboration, but they organize it around different work.
Questions people ask
Is Miro or TeamGantt cheaper?
For a small team using a free plan, Miro allows three editable boards, while TeamGantt Personal allows one user, one project, and 40 tasks. Paid pricing is not directly comparable: Miro Starter is $8 per member per month billed yearly; TeamGantt Base is $49.08 per month billed yearly for five projects.
Can Miro replace TeamGantt?
Miro includes planning tools, roadmaps, diagrams, and AI-assisted visual work, but the published plan details do not list Gantt scheduling, task dependencies, workload planning, or baselines. If those schedule controls are essential, TeamGantt lists them directly. The better choice depends on whether your work centers on a canvas or a project schedule.
Does TeamGantt have a free plan?
Yes. TeamGantt’s free Personal plan includes one user, one project, and 40 tasks, plus dependencies and drag-and-drop scheduling. TeamGantt also lists a 14-day free trial. Its paid Base plan starts at $49.08 per month with annual billing, or $59 with monthly billing.
What are the main limits on Miro’s free plan?
Miro Free includes three editable boards, along with 7,000+ templates, 250+ integrations, and 100 MCP calls per day, according to the plan details. Starter is $8 per member per month billed yearly and includes unlimited private boards and 25 AI credits per member each month.